Australian Politics Forum - Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #285 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am

Cynik wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:02am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:00am:

Cynik wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:58am:

You don't pay tax when you collect the dole like aleswine. No wonder he can't afford a car.

I knew it was you! Missed you!

I find your brand of idiocy highly amusing. I'm surprised you've been able to survive as long as you have being a mouth breather.

I'm just impressed you saved up all your centrelink money for a DB7. Good on you! Must of taken ages!

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!! Reply #286 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:57am: [b you have terrible logic. well i didnt say it and i ddint propose it. obviously thats terrible logic. you did propose it.
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #287 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:55am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:43am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:41am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

Why is it so important to alevine if I work at maccas?

Well if you just lost your job then you are no longer working for a living, and I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

thats not the question i asked.

? yes it is. I'd prefer you are gainfully employed, Ian. I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

Why do you consider the unemployed to be leeches?

never said unemployed. just you.

how could I leech off taxes if im not unemployed, theres your superior logic again. how about you explain it to us,.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 9451	Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!! Reply #288 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am: ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:57am: [b you have terrible logic. well i didnt say it and i ddint propose it. obviously thats terrible logic. you did propose it. Show this.
Back to top	IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #289 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:20am

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:57am:

[b
you have terrible logic.

well i didnt say it and i ddint propose it. obviously thats terrible logic.

you did propose it.

Show this.

you said you like all people who work for a living. that implies people who don't work for a living you don't like. A subset of these people are people who unfortunately happen to be disabled, and as a result can't work.

I think you need to define things better.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #290 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:20am

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:55am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:43am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:41am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

Why is it so important to alevine if I work at maccas?

Well if you just lost your job then you are no longer working for a living, and I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

thats not the question i asked.

? yes it is. I'd prefer you are gainfully employed, Ian. I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

Why do you consider the unemployed to be leeches?

never said unemployed. just you.

how could I leech off taxes if im not unemployed, theres your superior logic again. how about you explain it to us,.

but you lost your job at maccas?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #291 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:30am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:20am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:57am:

[b
you have terrible logic.

well i didnt say it and i ddint propose it. obviously thats terrible logic.

you did propose it.

Show this.

you said you like all people who work for a living. that implies people who don't work for a living you don't like. A subset of these people are people who unfortunately happen to be disabled, and as a result can't work.

I think you need to define things better.

i think its reprehensible to use disabled people in an attempt to score points on a political forum. But what would I know.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #292 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:32am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:20am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:55am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:43am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:41am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

Why is it so important to alevine if I work at maccas?

Well if you just lost your job then you are no longer working for a living, and I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

thats not the question i asked.

? yes it is. I'd prefer you are gainfully employed, Ian. I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

Why do you consider the unemployed to be leeches?

never said unemployed. just you.

how could I leech off taxes if im not unemployed, theres your superior logic again. how about you explain it to us,.

but you lost your job at maccas?

You appear to have some obsession with Macdonalds. have you ever worked there?

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #293 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:35am

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:30am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:20am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:57am:

[b
you have terrible logic.

well i didnt say it and i ddint propose it. obviously thats terrible logic.

you did propose it.

Show this.

you said you like all people who work for a living. that implies people who don't work for a living you don't like. A subset of these people are people who unfortunately happen to be disabled, and as a result can't work.

I think you need to define things better.

i think its reprehensible to use disabled people in an attempt to score points on a political forum. But what would I know.

You're the one who proposed. Not me. I just think you need to think a bit more about things before saying something so bluntly.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #294 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:36am

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:32am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:20am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:55am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:43am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:41am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

ian wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 12:36am:

Why is it so important to alevine if I work at maccas?

Well if you just lost your job then you are no longer working for a living, and I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

thats not the question i asked.

? yes it is. I'd prefer you are gainfully employed, Ian. I don't want you leeching off my taxes.

Why do you consider the unemployed to be leeches?

never said unemployed. just you.

how could I leech off taxes if im not unemployed, theres your superior logic again. how about you explain it to us,.

but you lost your job at maccas?

You appear to have some obsession with Macdonalds. have you ever worked there?

I worked at Hungry Jacks when I was a teenager. Good experience, I encourage it for everyone.

My obsession is to make sure you do not leech off my taxes. So I hope you are in fact indispensable to maccas and don't lose your job flipping burgers.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 9^th, 2016 at 1:43am by sir prince duke alevine »

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #295 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 7:45am

Interesting

But the ABC has acknowledged there was an error in its reporting of the story.

"Our source, the treating doctor told our reporters about two cases. One was an older child," the ABC said in a statement.

"The doctor stands by her statement that this child was allegedly raped on Nauru.

"She also told our reporters about another of her patients, a five-year-old who was allegedly sexually assaulted on Nauru.

"Our story incorrectly used quotes about the older child in referring to the younger child.

"In addition on at least one occasion the incident was referred to as a rape instead of an alleged rape. ABC News apologises for the errors and confusion."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-08/abc-acknowledges-error-in-reporting-nauru-...

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #296 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 8:24am

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 7:45am:

Interesting

But the ABC has acknowledged there was an error in its reporting of the story.

"Our source, the treating doctor told our reporters about two cases. One was an older child," the ABC said in a statement.

"The doctor stands by her statement that this child was allegedly raped on Nauru.

"She also told our reporters about another of her patients, a five-year-old who was allegedly sexually assaulted on Nauru.

"Our story incorrectly used quotes about the older child in referring to the younger child.

"In addition on at least one occasion the incident was referred to as a rape instead of an alleged rape. ABC News apologises for the errors and confusion."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-08/abc-acknowledges-error-in-reporting-nauru-...

Unfortunately the rape deniers will now cling on to this as their vindication that somehow Nauru is a 5 star resort where the refugee children confuse massage with rape. They have no shame.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 150633
Gender: male

Re: Refugee advocates telling porkies!!!
Reply #297 - Feb 9^th, 2016 at 9:18am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 8:24am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2016 at 7:45am:

Interesting

But the ABC has acknowledged there was an error in its reporting of the story.

"Our source, the treating doctor told our reporters about two cases. One was an older child," the ABC said in a statement.

"The doctor stands by her statement that this child was allegedly raped on Nauru.

"She also told our reporters about another of her patients, a five-year-old who was allegedly sexually assaulted on Nauru.

"Our story incorrectly used quotes about the older child in referring to the younger child.

"In addition on at least one occasion the incident was referred to as a rape instead of an alleged rape. ABC News apologises for the errors and confusion."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-08/abc-acknowledges-error-in-reporting-nauru-...

Unfortunately the rape deniers will now cling on to this as their vindication that somehow Nauru is a 5 star resort where the refugee children confuse massage with rape. They have no shame.

Ain't that the truth.

"Authorities are investigating several allegations of the sexual abuse of children being held at Darwin's Wickham Point detention centre, doctors say."

Claims of sexual abuse against children at Wickham Point detention centre under investigation.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged