greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 9:00am:
GordyL wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 5:47am:
Laugh till you cry wrote on Feb 6
th, 2016 at 12:40am:
Soren wrote on Feb 5
th, 2016 at 11:04pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 5
th, 2016 at 6:10am:
Why is a hijab so offensive to you folk?
It's just a scarf. Get over it.
All this multiculti BS is always one way. The West has to learn about Islam and tolerate it but the 'Muslim' lands can go on exterminating Christians and Jews and other non-Muslims and that's seen as as an expression of their rich cultural tradition.
Soren must fear getting out of bed every morning or whatever time he stumbles out.
Its evident none of the conservatives on Ozpolitic have lived among Muslims of whom 99.99% are decent people.
Islamophobic conservatives of Ozpolitic are blathering hate from behind a veil of total ignorance.
Calling people Islamaphobes for characterising the multitudes of horrors associated with Islam is like describing people who don't want to be around asbestos as being mesothelioma-a-phobic.
NOTHING good happens when muslims move en mass into your neighbourhood
That's what all the Islamophobes say.
The Islamophobia slander is a denial of critical thought so Islam may be defended from scrutiny
The ‘Islamophobia’ slander is merely the fear that Muslims have of critical thought. They are terrified that critical thought may destroy the foundations of Islamic faith, because Islam is based on hearsay and repetition, rather than on verifiable facts.
Islam cannot survive detailed inquiry, critical analysis or close scrutiny. Islamic faith depends on unquestioning, blind acquiescence to the basic documents of Islam. Islam cannot be rigorously tested, so it must be protected by a wall of silence and death threats against the critics. Muslims know this and are touchy about admitting that Islam is a flimsy house of cards.
Faith in Islam’s teachings falls apart and collapses as soon as the historicity and amoral character of Mohammed are examined. Mohammed’s character is the greatest liability in Islam. The legendary and unhistorical nature of Islam’s early biographies of Mohammed are not supported by outside sources, making the biography of Mohammed a matter of pure speculation, if not total subjectivity.
The ‘Islamophobia’ slur is an ad hominem condemnation demeaning all critics of Islam as being mentally ill, but this is obviously not true, since rational inquiry about Islam is highly intellectual. Thus criticism of Islam is proof of one’s sanity.
Muslims want to live in liberal, Western societies, while having Islam exempted from the scrutiny of critical inquiry…which is the sort of mental process that makes those societies vibrant and desirable to live in. By removing critical thought, Muslims will make those societies as stagnant and backward as all Muslim countries, thereby defeating their reason for moving to the West.
Obama refuses to say ‘Islamic terrorism’ when referring to Islamic terrorism in case it might legitimize Islamic terrorism. Absurd. The legitimacy of Islamic terrorism comes from the foundational texts of Islam, rather than from the US president, the US congress or the US constitution.
Criticism of Islam is basically a call for Muslims to leave their barbaric Death Cult and join the civilized modern world.
Forum
Pages: 
Hijab-wearing athlete to make U.S. Olympic history (Read 4747 times)
