Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 8
th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
random wrote on Feb 5
th, 2016 at 5:13am:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 4
th, 2016 at 6:51am:
ian wrote on Feb 3
rd, 2016 at 11:29pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 3
rd, 2016 at 8:26am:
[
you need to get past the idea that "alpha males teaching respect to beta males" is something that they get some sort of cheap thrills out of.
you could easily get the right sort of guys, with a spirit of contribution, encouragement and challenge to rehabilitate beta male criminals. (and believe me, most of them would have other things to do)
a man who, for instance, is violent to a woman is the very worst type of beta male. he needs to be treated "proactively' and assisted to be a real man, by real men.
he does not need to be treated 'reactively' and imprisoned and taught to be even more bitter, twisted, and emotionally chaotic
yes, good points.
Ian, i am a keen student of nature.
,snip>
No problem with nature, except when you foolishly think it has a place in society.
Let me keep it simple for you. The police are the thin blue line keeping nature and society apart. Those who cross the line, thinking they are alpha males teaching a lesson, are locked up.
You like the jungle the go back to it. You like the benefits if a social existence then you should work with that.
Classic feminist reinterpretation of masculinity:
it's just about beating the sh*t out of each other. Two areas of masculinity the feminists purposely ignore: self-control and innovation.
.. and who.. exactly... might one ask.... invented the police etc? MEN!
I find it amazing that somehow those very mainstays of civilisation for centuries are now considered the very enemies of civilisation and of civilised behaviour, and are assaulted daily as a group rather than on an individual basis of genuine wrongdoing.
There is NO place in this society for the destruction of the Rule of Law, via 'guilt by emotion' and 'guilt by accusation' as is the case with the current dealing with 'domestic and apprehended (non) violence' .. the violence you have when you're not having violence, and in which the very vast majority of 'cases' involve ZERO violence, apart from that done to men on whim by courts and police.
The police may well be the thin blue line - but Law is the Thin Black Line that separates civilisation from the brutes..... and the abuse of Law Itself cannot be countenanced as a means of controlling potential violence by imposing an illegal regime of direct violence against countless innocents who are found guilty by accusation and on emotion....
That is why we once HAD Law and not 'law'.....
Unless there is a separate agenda in play.. as there undoubtedly is... that being the subjugation of men, those most likely to resist such tyranny and oppression, as a first step to the establishment of a totally controlled society.
Forum
Pages: 
