beer
Senior Member
  
Offline

Australian Politics
Posts: 274
sydney
Gender:
|
You guys don't really understand the structure of China, here is a little bit correction to your view:
China is not one piece. Not like developed countries, China has huge economic diversity. It does not only mean poor are poor and rich are rich. It also means each class has huge population, my own estimation:
0.6 billion: absolute poor, not even involved in economy cycle, living in villages or small county towns, even not visible in Chinese own media. annual income 10k CNY
0.3 billion: migrate workers from villages to cities; they are younger and involved in the industry, poor but have basic income and social welfare cover, especially medicare like cover when they have a job. They can not affort properties or cars, but they can afford electronic products, like PC, TV, phones. They are connected to internet. annual income is about. 30k CNY.
0.3 billion: original city residents living in small and big cities. They live in their own properties, although not very good condition, they may afford cheap cars, they have stable jobs in companies or government related sectors. They can afford dinners in restaurants and have social life and entertainments. annual income is 50K-80K CNY.
0.1 billion: high income, like professionals, officials, small business owner. They own their own properties in good condition, good location, may have seperate investment properties. They are main players in stock market and buying good quality goods and services. Living condition matches with mid class worldwide. Annual income is about 100K to 300K.
10-30 million: rich and super rich. No need to explain.
I use CNY instead of USD or AUD. Because the price is not comparable in local market. In small cities, everything is still very cheap. You can treat 50K CNY income as 30-40K AUD income here in terms of purchasing power, though simple exchange rate based calculation maybe only 10K AUD.
So what I am saying is if assume a Chinese only shop local products, no imported expensive things, no holidays to big cities:
There are 0.3 billion village migrant workers have similar purchasing power as a Aussie fresh graduates. They buy iPhone etc.
There are another 0.3 billion city residents, their local purchasing power is equivalent to majority of Australian workers. They eat, dinning, watch movies, chat chat chat, doing useless things, just without a car. Car is not count as local products.
And there is 0.1 billion has 1+ properties, cars, holidays, buying imported milk powders. It's a huge number. Actually a professional worker may only earn 200K CNY in Chinese big cities, it's only 50K AUD. But what you have in pokcet after tax and spending is about half. That's similar to AUD 100-150K earners here.
The rest 10-30 miilion own everything, include properties in Sydney.
This is the big picture.
So next time, talking about China you should see it doesn't mean poor nor rich. It means a Africa + Europe + Wall Street style.
Also culture is different, it's not a capitalism country, 99% is, but the core 1% is communism + imperialism. It's a energetic and dangerous core, powered up by capitalism shell, but not led by money only business value or logic.
|