Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 26
th, 2016 at 7:27pm:
The biggest dispute is over whether the Prez will be a PEEP or just another political flunkey... the Wee Johnnie approach was designed to derail the entire issue by ensuring that the 'president' would be an appointee of the Parliament - i.e. the majority party - and would have no powers.
Just another waste of money like the Governor General and AOTY... all nonsense costing wasted dollars that we need.. or so they keep telling us....
We need a total overhaul which is why I'm a PEEP Republican....
**PEEP - Popularly Elected Employed President (of the People)....**
With a popularly elected President and Prime Minister, the country would have two politicised roles... Two persons who could claim a mandate from the people.
It is arguable that this would be a platform for constitutional crises similar to 1975 recurring.
The reason constitutional monarchies (where the royal families are born in the culture and the country of the monarchy), are so successful and bring about such remarkable political stability, is that they eliminate a potential political showdown between the HOS and the HOG.
The 'hole in the heart' of a monarchical system is where the system is exported beyond the borders of its origin. This can be observed wherever the exported monarchy acts in the role of that foreign nation's HOS... All these nations, at regular intervals, angst over the foreignness of their HOS... That is true even in Scotland.
Historically, even the foreign spouses of monarchs (and/or the monarch's perceived foreignness) has been at times a cause for concern within the country of their birth... In the UK the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family felt compelled to change their name to Windsor. And Battenburg to Mountbatten. Queen Mary (consort of George V) was often held in suspicion by the English.