Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 25
th, 2016 at 7:09pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25
th, 2016 at 6:07pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 25
th, 2016 at 3:50pm:
I don't believe you've ever been a scrutineer ...
I couldn't care less what you believe, but I've scrutinised at at least six elections (state and federal).
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 25
th, 2016 at 3:50pm:
... you'd know that informal votes include those marked incorrectly (i.e. incorrectly numbering boxes or putting ticks or crosses or circles around candidate names, etc), those with unauthorised marks (eg signatures or initials other than a mark by an election official in the corner of the ballot paper) and also those with drawings of fairies or words like "Rudd sucks"...
What I said, to correct you, is that donkey votes and informal votes are not the same thing.
Donkey votes are not regarded as informal. WRONG!!!
A donkey vote is one that numbers all boxes in sequential order, either from top to bottom or bottom to top.
They are perfectly legitimate, and they are not put aside as informal - they are included in the tally.
You got it wrong. Time to move on.
No, I'm 100% correct.
Donkey votes are not informal votes.
They are completely legitimate, and they are included in the final tally.
"Definition of a donkey vote: A donkey vote occurs when a voter numbers every box on the ballot paper in order from top to bottom, without regard to the logic of the preferences. In some cases, a voter might start at the bottom of the ballot paper and number them in order to the top.
"A DONKEY VOTE IS A FORMAL VOTE. IT WILL BE COUNTED AND IT WILL GO TO WHOEVER IS MARKED NUMBER 1."
http://australianpolitics.com/2013/09/04/what-happens-to-donkey-votes.html"A vote is regarded as informal if the ballot paper has not been completed properly. Informal ballot papers are not counted towards any candidate but are set aside.
"According to section 268 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act (1918), a vote is informal if:
"the ballot paper is not marked at all
"the ballot paper does not have the official mark and has not been initialled by the polling official, and the ballot paper is not authentic in the opinion of the Divisional Returning Officer (DRO)
"the ballot paper has writing on it which identifies the voter
in the case of an absent vote, the ballot paper is not contained in the declaration envelope
"the voter has not completed a full preferential vote. There are savings measures to keep formal some ballot papers marked incompletely or incorrectly."
"Donkey vote
"A ballot paper marked 1, 2, 3, 4 straight down (or up) a ballot paper."
http://www.aec.gov.au/footer/Glossary.htmAnd, from Antony Green:
"The Sustainable Population Party polled just 0.9% of the vote but delivered a remarkable 72.5% of preferences to Labor, this high flow from a low vote largely due to the donkey vote."
"The fact that Liberal Andrew Hastie is higher on the ballot paper than Labor's Matt Keogh gives Hastie a narrow advantage by the donkey vote, but the advantage is unchanged on the 2013 election when Don Randall drew top spot on the ballot.
"So the donkey vote favours the Liberal Party in Canning, but it is neutral in its impact on the swing needed compared to the 2013 election because the Liberal Party had the donkey vote advantage in 2013 and again in 2015."
http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2015/09/preferences-donkey-votes-and-the-can...