Australian Politics Forum - What the Poor dont understand about the Rich

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #90 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #91 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #92 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm Does what you're doing here count as "screeching"?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #93 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

That's not what you wrote before. Your post referred to any woman in the far rights movement. There was not mention of screeching in your post at all. So you are allowed to call women scrags and we can't because we are males hey?? Huh

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 36383 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #94 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:23pm ... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm: Does what you're doing here count as "screeching"? Nope. You only consider it so becaise i am a woman with an opposing view point to yours. It's part of your disease.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #95 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:24pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

That's not what you wrote before. Your post referred to any woman in the far rights movement. There was not mention of screeching in your post at all. So you are allowed to call women scrags and we can't because we are males hey?? Huh

Yes it was. I said the scrags who attend Reclaim Australia rallies.

Then you asked me if i thought women in the KKK were scrags. I said yes.

I think the men are scrags too .. but don;t let that get in the way of your witch hunt.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #96 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:25pm I wonder if mothra would get upset if I called her a left wing screeching scrag??
Back to top	IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #97 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:26pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:24pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

That's not what you wrote before. Your post referred to any woman in the far rights movement. There was not mention of screeching in your post at all. So you are allowed to call women scrags and we can't because we are males hey?? Huh

Yes it was. I said the scrags who attend Reclaim Australia rallies.

Then you asked me if i thought women in the KKK were scrags. I said yes.

I think the men are scrags too .. but don;t let that get in the way of your witch hunt.

No mention of screeching it all , was there? Do you know the reclaim Australia women enough to refer to them as scrags?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #98 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:27pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:25pm:

I wonder if mothra would get upset if I called her a left wing screeching scrag?? Huh

Meh. You've called me worse.

Although i have failed to 'screech' at any point. I am merely typing. Funny how confronted you fellas are by a woman TYPING stuff at you.

Am i not subservient enough?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #99 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:27pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:23pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

Does what you're doing here count as "screeching"?

Nope. You only consider it so becaise i am a woman with an opposing view point to yours.

It's part of your disease.

Yeah OK. You're not picking fights over nothing or being abusive. It's all in my head.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #100 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:28pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:27pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:25pm:

I wonder if mothra would get upset if I called her a left wing screeching scrag?? Huh

Meh. You've called me worse.

Although i have failed to 'screech' at any point. I am merely typing. Funny how confronted you fellas are by a woman TYPING stuff at you.

Am i not subservient enough?

You've called me worse darling.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #101 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:28pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:24pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

That's not what you wrote before. Your post referred to any woman in the far rights movement. There was not mention of screeching in your post at all. So you are allowed to call women scrags and we can't because we are males hey?? Huh

Yes it was. I said the scrags who attend Reclaim Australia rallies.

Then you asked me if i thought women in the KKK were scrags. I said yes.

I think the men are scrags too .. but don;t let that get in the way of your witch hunt.

No mention of screeching it all , was there? Do you know the reclaim Australia women enough to refer to them as scrags?

I know their ideology. I find it thoroughly offensive and indicative of a small, uneducated mind.

Their attendance at such a rally pinpoints them as absolute bottom feeders.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #102 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:29pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:23pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

Does what you're doing here count as "screeching"?

Nope. You only consider it so becaise i am a woman with an opposing view point to yours.

It's part of your disease.

Yeah OK. You're not picking fights over nothing or being abusive. It's all in my head.

Nope. I'm not.

I took back the stupid. The rest stands.

And no fights over nothing. It took you how many pages to admit you consider your wife subservient?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #103 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:31pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:28pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:24pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

That's not what you wrote before. Your post referred to any woman in the far rights movement. There was not mention of screeching in your post at all. So you are allowed to call women scrags and we can't because we are males hey?? Huh

Yes it was. I said the scrags who attend Reclaim Australia rallies.

Then you asked me if i thought women in the KKK were scrags. I said yes.

I think the men are scrags too .. but don;t let that get in the way of your witch hunt.

No mention of screeching it all , was there? Do you know the reclaim Australia women enough to refer to them as scrags?

I know their ideology. I find it thoroughly offensive and indicative of a small, uneducated mind.

Their attendance at such a rally pinpoints them as absolute bottom feeders.

An ideaolgy you oppose colours your opinion of these women as being ugly (scrags), dumb, a of low socio economic order??? Is that judgement and prejudice? I thought you didn't like prejudice?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #104 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:33pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:28pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:24pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:19pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:14pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Mothra has referred to women as scrags in a previous post.

Only racist nutjobs that screech like banshees.

You know, the kind of woman you go for.

So you refer to women with opposing political views as scrags? How sexist!!

Nope. Just screeching racists.

That's not what you wrote before. Your post referred to any woman in the far rights movement. There was not mention of screeching in your post at all. So you are allowed to call women scrags and we can't because we are males hey?? Huh

Yes it was. I said the scrags who attend Reclaim Australia rallies.

Then you asked me if i thought women in the KKK were scrags. I said yes.

I think the men are scrags too .. but don;t let that get in the way of your witch hunt.

No mention of screeching it all , was there? Do you know the reclaim Australia women enough to refer to them as scrags?

I know their ideology. I find it thoroughly offensive and indicative of a small, uneducated mind.

Their attendance at such a rally pinpoints them as absolute bottom feeders.

An ideaolgy you oppose colours your opinion of these women as being ugly (scrags), dumb, a of low socio economic order??? Is that judgement and prejudice? I thought you didn't like prejudice?

I didn't say ugly or specify their socio-economic group.

Dumb? Yes.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged