Australian Politics Forum - What the Poor dont understand about the Rich

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #60 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #61 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #62 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #63 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 41302
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #64 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:09pm

Mothra Quote:

...............We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet...............

I doubt I have ever even met a woman who thought that.
She would not interest me.

Nor Aqua, the man amongst man.

How come I can only back him 124% ...........?

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #65 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:10pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:09pm:

Mothra Quote:

...............We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet...............

I doubt I have ever even met a woman who thought that.
She would not interest me.

Nor Aqua, the man amongst man.

How come I can only back him 124% ...........?

Aqua argues that women need men to lead us. It is an outdated and highly misogynistic argument.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #66 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:16pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Of course its ridiculous, thats the point.

When it takes 2 parts to make a whole, neither part has more "general worth" than the other. If you are a handlebar but judge yourself by criteria for pedals, youre just not going to be successful, nor happy. Youd be better off focusing on what a good hadlebar can bring to the table.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #67 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:20pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Of course its ridiculous, thats the point.

When it takes 2 parts to make a whole, neither part has more "general worth" than the other. If you are a handlebar but judge yourself by criteria for pedals, youre just not going to be successful, nor happy. Youd be better off focusing on what a good hadlebar can bring to the table.

So men and women have their allotted places then? Men lead, women follow?

Thank-you for at last answering the question, albeit by deflection and failed metaphor.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #68 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:24pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:20pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Of course its ridiculous, thats the point.

When it takes 2 parts to make a whole, neither part has more "general worth" than the other. If you are a handlebar but judge yourself by criteria for pedals, youre just not going to be successful, nor happy. Youd be better off focusing on what a good hadlebar can bring to the table.

So men and women have their allotted places then? Men lead, women follow?

Thank-you for at last answering the question, albeit by deflection and failed metaphor.

If being in charge is so important to you, pair up with a weak man. Luckily most people are more interested in being happy than being "right". Priorities.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #69 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:28pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:24pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:20pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Of course its ridiculous, thats the point.

When it takes 2 parts to make a whole, neither part has more "general worth" than the other. If you are a handlebar but judge yourself by criteria for pedals, youre just not going to be successful, nor happy. Youd be better off focusing on what a good hadlebar can bring to the table.

So men and women have their allotted places then? Men lead, women follow?

Thank-you for at last answering the question, albeit by deflection and failed metaphor.

If being in charge is so important to you, pair up with a weak man. Luckily most people are more interested in being happy than being "right". Priorities.

I don't need to be in charge. I need to be an equal.

Seriously, get with the times.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #70 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:32pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:24pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:20pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Of course its ridiculous, thats the point.

When it takes 2 parts to make a whole, neither part has more "general worth" than the other. If you are a handlebar but judge yourself by criteria for pedals, youre just not going to be successful, nor happy. Youd be better off focusing on what a good hadlebar can bring to the table.

So men and women have their allotted places then? Men lead, women follow?

Thank-you for at last answering the question, albeit by deflection and failed metaphor.

If being in charge is so important to you, pair up with a weak man. Luckily most people are more interested in being happy than being "right". Priorities.

I don't need to be in charge. I need to be an equal.

Seriously, get with the times.

Every ship needs a captain.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #71 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:34pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:32pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:24pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:20pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:08pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:03pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

What has more general worth - a set of pedals or a set of handlebars?

Let me guess ... women are the pedals?

The man steers while women do all the hard work.

If you like.

So, which one has more "general worth?"

It's a ridiculous analogy.

Answer the question.

Of course its ridiculous, thats the point.

When it takes 2 parts to make a whole, neither part has more "general worth" than the other. If you are a handlebar but judge yourself by criteria for pedals, youre just not going to be successful, nor happy. Youd be better off focusing on what a good hadlebar can bring to the table.

So men and women have their allotted places then? Men lead, women follow?

Thank-you for at last answering the question, albeit by deflection and failed metaphor.

If being in charge is so important to you, pair up with a weak man. Luckily most people are more interested in being happy than being "right". Priorities.

I don't need to be in charge. I need to be an equal.

Seriously, get with the times.

Every ship needs a captain.

And according to you, that's either a man or a woman in a relationship with a weak man ... i get it.

You're several decades out of date.

And anyway, no it doesn't. And a marriage is not a ship. Enough with the piss weak analogies already.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36383 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #72 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:35pm Does your wife know that you think of her as subservient?
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 41302
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #73 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:35pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:10pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:09pm:

Mothra Quote:

...............We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet...............

I doubt I have ever even met a woman who thought that.
She would not interest me.

Nor Aqua, the man amongst man.

How come I can only back him 124% ...........?

Aqua argues that women need men to lead us. It is an outdated and highly misogynistic argument.

124%

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #74 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:36pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:35pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:10pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 1:09pm:

Mothra Quote:

...............We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet...............

I doubt I have ever even met a woman who thought that.
She would not interest me.

Nor Aqua, the man amongst man.

How come I can only back him 124% ...........?

Aqua argues that women need men to lead us. It is an outdated and highly misogynistic argument.

124%

So you do think women are inferior to men. Thanks for that. You shouldn't have denied it.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged