Australian Politics Forum - What the Poor dont understand about the Rich

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 41305
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #45 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:25pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:22pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:16pm:

Quote:

I'm not the one saying your gender is inherently inferior Horse Boy ... and you talk to me about shiiiit tests?

Yeah, you are. If you dont value the traits with which women can compete with or outshine men, thats your dysfunction, and doesnt harm anyone but yourself.

I think i know a little more about what women can and cannot do than you Honky. You're another one that thinks men are superior. Does your wife know you think like that?

I can only imagine the kind of woman you attracted.

yes, hah, probably Bo Derek, Elle Macpherson, some top ranked european tennis professional or the like.

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 41305 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #46 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:26pm You all should realise, I am 124% on Aquas side.
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36383 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #47 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:27pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:26pm: You all should realise, I am 124% on Aquas side. So you think women are inferior to men Sprint?
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 22986
ACT
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #48 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:28pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:25pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:22pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:16pm:

Quote:

I'm not the one saying your gender is inherently inferior Horse Boy ... and you talk to me about shiiiit tests?

Yeah, you are. If you dont value the traits with which women can compete with or outshine men, thats your dysfunction, and doesnt harm anyone but yourself.

I think i know a little more about what women can and cannot do than you Honky. You're another one that thinks men are superior. Does your wife know you think like that?

I can only imagine the kind of woman you attracted.

yes, hah, probably Bo Derek, Elle Macpherson, some top ranked european tennis professional or the like.

Honky couldnt attract a hooker in a brothel with a hand full of $100 bills! Grin

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #49 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:28pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:22pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:16pm:

Quote:

I'm not the one saying your gender is inherently inferior Horse Boy ... and you talk to me about shiiiit tests?

Yeah, you are. If you dont value the traits with which women can compete with or outshine men, thats your dysfunction, and doesnt harm anyone but yourself.

I think i know a little more about what women can and cannot do than you Honky. You're another one that thinks men are superior. Does your wife know you think like that?

I can only imagine the kind of woman you attracted.

Thats stupid. Both are necessary and effectively useless without the other.

Its like saying that the day is "superior" to night, or that s nut is "superior" to a bolt. Its complete nonsense.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #50 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:30pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:28pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:22pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:16pm:

Quote:

I'm not the one saying your gender is inherently inferior Horse Boy ... and you talk to me about shiiiit tests?

Yeah, you are. If you dont value the traits with which women can compete with or outshine men, thats your dysfunction, and doesnt harm anyone but yourself.

I think i know a little more about what women can and cannot do than you Honky. You're another one that thinks men are superior. Does your wife know you think like that?

I can only imagine the kind of woman you attracted.

Thats stupid. Both are necessary and effectively useless without the other.

Its like saying that the day is "superior" to night, or that s nut is "superior" to a bolt. Its complete nonsense.

Yet your views on women are very much that they are inferior to you. It drips off you.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36383 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #51 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:31pm Even that denial suggests that women have their 'place'. Let me guess, the place you give us?
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Laugh till you cry Gold Member Offline Posts: 16619 In your happy place Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #52 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:34pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:26pm: You all should realise, I am 124% on Aquas side. A disciple of the deranged.
Back to top	Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #53 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:36pm innocentbystander. wrote on Jan 20^th, 2016 at 9:00pm: To be honest one thing I have learned is that there really is no right or wrong Nope, you are definitely wrong.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #54 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:38pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:30pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:28pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:22pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:16pm:

Quote:

I'm not the one saying your gender is inherently inferior Horse Boy ... and you talk to me about shiiiit tests?

Yeah, you are. If you dont value the traits with which women can compete with or outshine men, thats your dysfunction, and doesnt harm anyone but yourself.

I think i know a little more about what women can and cannot do than you Honky. You're another one that thinks men are superior. Does your wife know you think like that?

I can only imagine the kind of woman you attracted.

Thats stupid. Both are necessary and effectively useless without the other.

Its like saying that the day is "superior" to night, or that s nut is "superior" to a bolt. Its complete nonsense.

Yet your views on women are very much that they are inferior to you. It drips off you.

Inferior/superior is a pointless dichotomy unless you specify what theyre inferior/superior at. Is a fish "superior" to a monkey?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #55 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:41pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:38pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:30pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:28pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:22pm:

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:16pm:

Quote:

I'm not the one saying your gender is inherently inferior Horse Boy ... and you talk to me about shiiiit tests?

Yeah, you are. If you dont value the traits with which women can compete with or outshine men, thats your dysfunction, and doesnt harm anyone but yourself.

I think i know a little more about what women can and cannot do than you Honky. You're another one that thinks men are superior. Does your wife know you think like that?

I can only imagine the kind of woman you attracted.

Thats stupid. Both are necessary and effectively useless without the other.

Its like saying that the day is "superior" to night, or that s nut is "superior" to a bolt. Its complete nonsense.

Yet your views on women are very much that they are inferior to you. It drips off you.

Inferior/superior is a pointless dichotomy unless you specify what theyre inferior/superior at.

We are discussing general worth. Aqua argues that women need men to lead us because we are lost without them. We are, apparently, incapable of manifesting our own sovereignty.

I call bullshit.

I doubt you do.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #56 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #57 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:48pm

... wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:45pm:

Aqua didnt say anything about general worth. Why would he - its a nonsense discussion. What has more "general worth"? A nut or a bolt?

If women require men to lead them. then it follows that they are naturally inferior. This equates to general worth.

Seriously, did you need that spelled out for you?

We are only good as 'property'

It's an old and outdated argument. Some men haven't caught on yet. Nor some women, because somebody had to marry you sorry lot of misogynists..

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 41305 Gender:	Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich Reply #58 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:49pm mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:27pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:26pm: You all should realise, I am 124% on Aquas side. So you think women are inferior to men Sprint? Aquas correct on all things he says. Mothra - no, I don't think women are inferior.
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36383
Gender: female

Re: What the Poor dont understand about the Rich
Reply #59 - Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:50pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:49pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:27pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 21^st, 2016 at 12:26pm:

You all should realise, I am 124% on Aquas side.

So you think women are inferior to men Sprint?

Aquas correct on all things he says.

Mothra - no, I don't think women are inferior.

Aqua does.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged