Aussie wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 7:23pm:

You should ask him if attempting to circumvent the swear filter warrants a ban while you're at it aaaaaauuussssiee. I would think it hypocritical if the mods enforced one rule and not the other, hey chum?

Aussie wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 7:23pm:


So, you think that word is not appropriate?

Would you want to see that word added onto the Spell Checker?

Are there other words, you also think should be added?

And, do you think GMods should pursue Stalking & Baiting, a little more?

perceptions_now wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 8:16pm:


Oh dear.  There is no Rule against what you refer to as stalking.  FD has described very specific conduct as stalking.  Would you like me to put the Rule up again so that you understand?   I'll even explain it to you if you like.

Moving on to 'baiting.'  Sorry, can't find that word mentioned anywhere even, obliquely in the Rules.   Thank goodness for that as well.  Good Old Lord Herbert would be gone in a flash!

Finally.....I could not care less if you add that word to the little boy word filter.

I simply asked that if I referred to you as a 'retard,' or 'retarded' whether doing so would offend against the 'no personal criticism/abuse' Rule.

So far, you've done everything to avoid directly answering the question.  Are you protecting/preferencing Members who refer to others as a 'retard,' or 'retarded?'

Aussie wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Banning posters for using naughty words is stupid and childish. But banning posters for using sox particularly to navigate bans is a totally different issue. Only people with low self esteem and a lack of courage and argument resort to using sox.

Aussie wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 9:08pm:

I have never seen FD enforce the swear rule here in the nine years I've been here. It is only a recent thing since some new mod jock has hit town trying to make a name for himself with some petty enforcement of a rule never enforced for the first six years I posted here.
This forum worked much better when it was modded by the likes of Mozzak and Muso, as the participation rate of posters will prove given it has died in the proverbial since these draconian rules have been enforced. That is FDs problem, he obviously doesn't need the revenue anymore by letting this practice continue. Andrei is a realist in the same vein as Muso and Moz, unfortunately he is alone in that position.

You registered your Aussie 2 sock under a different name PRIOR to your Aussie ID having problems. You also have another sock you are denying you have.
I have no need to stalk longweekend, you do a good enough job for both of us. But I think he is just as insecure as anyone for using them.

Oh dear!!!!  Aussie2 has been banned!!!  Yet here I am.......the puppeteer of that sock.....merrily posting away.

You want to try making sense of that skippeee??

I reckon it is PN having absolutely no idea, but who knows.

(Look out longweekend/marial/Lisa Jones.)

Quote:


I wonder if cods will ever work out the intrinsic self evident problem right there?

Quote:


Thanks.  I wonder what 'it' did to get a ban? I know I was not banned then.   Do you know skippeeee?