issuevoter wrote on Jan 18
th, 2016 at 2:20pm:
I think Amadd has raised an interesting, if vitriolic, question. The point to be clarified is just which human endeavours are intrinsically valuable. I suppose you could say anything that provides for necessity. Whether necessity is nothing more than food and shelter is also an open question. I am at my most serene when producing something either material or intellectual. The species will have to reproduce, but I am not sure if the having of children is intrinsically valuable. It is an accepted reality of our existence and I think a different subject.
Probably the production and raising of children is the most important thing that can be done for the good of the society of tomorrow.
Your point is valid, in that , once the need for food, shelter, safety and sex are satisfied, we then move up Maslows hierachy and seek love, good relationships, a sense of community and a sense of contribution.
I sincerely believe that this is where capitalism will head.
A sort of "back to the future"
People will lose interest in cheap chinese made junk and want really beautiful things (and probably less of them ) to fill their houses.
This will lead to a more fulfilling work life for many workers as they move from being a cog producing massive ammounts of "junk" to being a "master craftsman" intimately involved in the production of things unique and that they can be proud of.
So we should see a better type of capitalism (driven by consumers) if consumers will start to think more sensibly about what gives them joy.
You can see this already in the food market.
It would have to be more rewarding to "produce" a top quality meal beautifully displayed on a plate then to be a maccas employee flipping yet another burger.
Its a win for the worker, its a win for the diner and its a win for small business over the multi nationals.
All available, as soon as the consumer develops a taste for more worth while things