Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost (Read 1066 times)
Sir Crook
Ex Member
*



Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:07am
 
Target and Kmart sell $2 school uniforms, but at what cost?

Date
    January 16, 2016
    Canberra Times

Major Australian retailers face criticism over extremely cheap school uniforms manufactured in Bangladesh, where the minimum wage is as low as $97 a month.

Major Australian retailers Kmart and Target have come under fire for selling $2 school uniforms while factory workers are paid below levels that can cover basic living expenses.   Sad

The $2 polo shirts that are the focus of the Target's national "Back to School" campaign are produced in Bangladeshi factories where wages can be as low as $97 a month.

This national minimum wage is up to 45 per cent below the "living wage" that allows workers to pay for basic food, water, shelter, clothing, and transport, according to Oxfam and international workers unions.


Rival retailer Kmart is also selling $5 button-up school shirts from factories in Bangladesh, while its $2 polos are made in China.

The retail cost of the polos is less than the wholesale amount paid by Best and Less, which was slammed in a 2015 Oxfam report for its transparency on factory conditions.

The founder of ethical clothing brand, Etiko, Nick Savidis, said he was "flabbergasted" by the pricing.


Forhad Mia and his wife Raifa who worked for $65 a month in a factory used by Kmart in 2013. They said their salaries were too low to live on.

"I don't know how they could do that without ripping someone off," he said. "It's not just the supply chain. It's where the fabrics are dyed and woven, where the cotton has grown. I have no idea how they could do it at that price, not to mention the cost of shipping it to Australia." 

Target would not comment on how they produced the shirts in Bangladeshi factories at such a low cost but said that it was "working towards," paying factory employees a living wage.

A Kmart spokeswoman said that Kmart had volume agreements that allowed them to "provide prices as low as ethically possible for our customers without compromise to our suppliers and their workers."




The price war comes three years after Bangladesh's garment industry was rocked by the deaths of 1127 workers during the Rana Plaza garment factory collapse.

A lack of fire escapes, poor safety standards and allegations of owners forcing workers back inside to work as the factory began to crumble damaged the reputation of the country's largest industry, which continued to boom by 14 per cent last year. Garments make up 80 per cent of the nation's exports and have lifted millions of workers out of poverty.

Following the Rana Plaza disaster, Target and Kmart were two of the first companies sign the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh.


There are an estimated 5000 garment factories in Bangladesh, employing more than four million people. Bangladeshi wages are some of the lowest in the world.

Discount retailer, Best and Less, who failed to sign the accord, is also selling back to school shirts made in Bangladesh for three times the price of its competitors.

A 2015 report from Oxfam that found the company had "made the least progress," since the Rana Plaza collapse by having an ethical sourcing code that fell short of the bar set by many other brands. It failed to name factory locations and identify how workers safety is monitored after it signed the less rigorous Alliance agreement.

"All of our polos are produced in one factory which is fully accredited with current certification which means all workers are paid a living wage and work freely of their own accord," a Best and Less spokeswoman said, before declining to name the actual factory in which they were produced.


Oxfam's manager of finance, Joy Kyriacou, said that while conditions had vastly improved under the "ground-breaking" accord, with Target and Kmart as key players, the garment sector's mostly female workforce where still working in precarious situations with up to 12-hour days and safety procedures nowhere near international standards. "There are still a lot of dodgy practices," she said.   Sad

"The weekly minimum wage is less than what many Australian's are paid an hour. We would like to see Australian companies move towards paying a decent wage," she said.

Ms Kyriacou said she could not comment on the specific factories from which the shirts were sourced from.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Crook
Ex Member
*



Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #1 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:11am
 
Target's general manager of corporate affairs, Kristene Reynolds, declined to name the factory from which the $2 polos were sourced from, but said the company was "proud of its ethical sourcing."

"Supply chain transparency is key to improving our responsibility," she said.

The company's ethical sourcing manager, Carly Richards, said they had been working with the supplier of the $2 uniforms since 2011 and the factory did not give Target any cause for concern.

"We do not put price before factory worker welfare," she said. "We measure factories against our code of conduct and undertake regular announced and unannounced audits."

She said Target was working with aid organisations to pay a living wage and developing a worker grievance program, where factory employees will be able to lodge complaints with Target's head office.

Kmart's general manager of sustainability, Tracie Walker, also declined to name the factory from where the shirts were sourced but said that the company regularly inspected both Chinese and Bangladeshi factories and that company was working towards a living wage agreement.

Etiko founder Nick Savidis said that the popularity of the $2 uniforms was ironic.

"There isn't one school that doesn't talk about globalisation or have teachers that talk about social justice and then they go and buy the cheapest school uniform they can," he said.

"What has been done is the absolute minimum, no major fashion retailers are paying above a living wage. Ultimately consumers have to be held accountable. It doesn't take too much to work out how cheap fashion is created."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #2 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:17am
 
sorry crook...

but dont you hold the consumers more responsible for this????..

come on..... if people didnt buy the business wouldnt.

then I guess the people that make them would be out of a job as well..

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

its a vicious circle isnt it..

we cant constantly put the whole blame on the one group....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 31281
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #3 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:39am
 
Yes we can ....it's the people/companies who go offshore exploiting/chasing slave labour garments/clothing ....

come back & sell it cheap but still at a good mark up

& oft use deceptive labelling

They are totally to blame.

What about the jobs in garment/textile factories here that were lost before this began?
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #4 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:49am
 
Gnads wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:39am:
Yes we can ....it's the people/companies who go offshore exploiting/chasing slave labour garments/clothing ....

come back & sell it cheap but still at a good mark up

& oft use deceptive labelling

They are totally to blame.

What about the jobs in garment/textile factories here that were lost before this began?





of course....but would you buy a school shirt for $15.. when you can buy one for $2..

why did these companies go off shore???... Roll Eyes

would you rather these poorer countries had more unemployment?... Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #5 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 7:37am
 
Gnads wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 6:39am:
Yes we can ....it's the people/companies who go offshore exploiting/chasing slave labour garments/clothing ....

come back & sell it cheap but still at a good mark up

& oft use deceptive labelling

They are totally to blame.

What about the jobs in garment/textile factories here that were lost before this began?

It's on 2 points: a company should always ensure its supply chain isn't fcked. But likewise, consumers should be smart an identify when a company does something fcked, and punish it.  I always get amazed at chocolate and the idea of "fair trade" chocolate, that costs an extra $2.  Why is this even a product? All products should be fair trade and if you can't effectively trade on the price then raise the price.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #6 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 8:52am
 
Australian parents will want the Australian taxpayer to foot the bill for THEIR children's school clothes and books anyways...

and you wonder why we are in debt?
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50411
At my desk.
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #7 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 9:03am
 
I think it is great that KMart and Target are supporting these desperate Bangladeshis.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #8 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:27am
 
I am still figuring out what chocolate has to do with anything... Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 76928
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #9 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:30am
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 8:52am:
Australian parents will want the Australian taxpayer to foot the bill for THEIR children's school clothes and books anyways...

and you wonder why we are in debt?



I missed that bit ... can you show me where you read that?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #10 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:33am
 
It's not great that they're working for such a pittance, but obviously it's more beneficial for them than having no job at all, otherwise they wouldn't work there.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 143603
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #11 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:39am
 
John Smith wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:30am:
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 8:52am:
Australian parents will want the Australian taxpayer to foot the bill for THEIR children's school clothes and books anyways...

and you wonder why we are in debt?



I missed that bit ... can you show me where you read that?


From what I understand, low-income parents used to be able to claim $400 per child, from Centrelink, to help with books and uniforms.

It was about $800 for high school kids.

The Government has now decided to cut this payment.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 76928
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #12 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:51am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:39am:
John Smith wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:30am:
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 8:52am:
Australian parents will want the Australian taxpayer to foot the bill for THEIR children's school clothes and books anyways...

and you wonder why we are in debt?



I missed that bit ... can you show me where you read that?


From what I understand, low-income parents used to be able to claim $400 per child, from Centrelink, to help with books and uniforms.

It was about $800 for high school kids.

The Government has now decided to cut this payment.


of course they have ... now my kids are old enough to go to school (or at least one is) they cut it! Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 143603
Gender: male
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #13 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 12:17pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:51am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:39am:
John Smith wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 11:30am:
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 8:52am:
Australian parents will want the Australian taxpayer to foot the bill for THEIR children's school clothes and books anyways...

and you wonder why we are in debt?



I missed that bit ... can you show me where you read that?


From what I understand, low-income parents used to be able to claim $400 per child, from Centrelink, to help with books and uniforms.

It was about $800 for high school kids.

The Government has now decided to cut this payment.


of course they have ... now my kids are old enough to go to school (or at least one is) they cut it! Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Well, that's Liberal Governments for you: absolute pricks.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98321
Re: Cheap $2 School Uniforms - But At What Cost
Reply #14 - Jan 17th, 2016 at 12:19pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 9:03am:
I think it is great that KMart and Target are supporting these desperate Bangladeshis.


They’re supporting sustainability, FD. The more of these tinted races we kill off through fires and exhaustion, the better off we’ll be.

Survival of the fittest, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print