mothra wrote on Jan 17
th, 2016 at 12:41am:
Setanta wrote on Jan 17
th, 2016 at 12:31am:
mothra wrote on Jan 17
th, 2016 at 12:25am:
Setanta wrote on Jan 17
th, 2016 at 12:23am:
mothra wrote on Jan 17
th, 2016 at 12:21am:
I'm not taking it personally. I'm enjoying the exchange. It's refreshing to have a civilised discussion on here. I like you too Setanta.
Now, would you say as a rape victim, i have a right to be offended by a game in which you are scored by raping as many women as possible?

As would I! Would I say such a game should not exist?
Then what is the difference? Can you not concede that a game which scores you on killing as many Aboriginals as you can is offensive to people who are the victim of the policies of white Australia?
The difference is I would choose to take offence at that, I find it a bit... What about WW2 games that kill Germans and Japs? Age of Empires that lets you relive the genocide of millions?
So it's about what you choose to take offence at?
Can you concede that Aboriginal people choose to take offence at this game? That i choose to take offence at this game?
I don;t think you;ve given a particularly noteworthy reason as to why one game is offensive and another is not, aside from what offends you personally . It is not an argument against what is offensive per se.
As for WW2 games, i find them to be in poor taste but i refer to a previous point of mine. Where is the balance of power? Uf the game is exterminating Jews, homosexuals, Catholics, Gypsies and the physically and mentally disadvantaged, then i take strong exception. Fighting the dominating force leaves me unoffended.
It's about where the power is.
Yes, it's what I choose, as do other people. I don't try to push my choice onto others though, I understand there are different views.
I concede some Aboriginals will take offence.
No game I have played have I found offensive. I kill dragons, nords, bretons, elves, wolves, bear, ogres, japs, germans, celts, assyrians, persians, and now apparently I can kill aboriginals.