Emma wrote on Jan 14
th, 2016 at 10:26pm:
Emma Peel Posted on: Today at 10:26pm
John Smith wrote Today at 9:59pm:
Emma Peel wrote Today at 9:55pm:
I sincerely hope you are wrong. I would much prefer he was brought to Court, here in Australia, to face these charges. I would expect he serve time for his crimes, if found guilty.
I would really be unhappy if his (likely wealth and influence) connections enabled him to continue his deviant ways here, or even if he was just deported, as an undesirable. He should be held to account. .
I would be happy if, after say a 5 year prison term, he was then extradited to Pakistan. ( should he survive) Smiley Smiley Smiley Angry Angry Angry
He is subject to our Law, and should face it.
His actions are NOT acceptable, and should not be minimalised and condoned.
see, you almost made sense but then you started getting hysterical again ... 5 yrs jail? for groping? you must be kidding. They rarely give 5 years jail for manslaughter these days, what hope have you got of getting 5 years for touching? ....
and no one ever said his actions were acceptable.
He is not charged with 'touching'.! Stop trying to downplay his actions. RAPE, or Attempted RAPE, equally despicable in Law, are hard charges to bring.
Surely it is for the Courts to decide... NOT YOU .
How would you know what he did?? You have a private line to him in jail.?
? You think the Police are making it up. ? You are on the Force perhaps.? You have some special knowledge.? NO YOU DO NOT. !
As for 'acceptability'..?? you seem to think these actions require a piss-off and don't come back.. response.
I do not agree. If ever there was a time and a place to show that this is not acceptable, or desireable, it is NOW and HERE.
POOR BUGGER... got caught for being what he is... send him home. NOT.
So you really believe that our Law is so ineffectual that the best we can hope for is to send him home.??
I expect much more from our legal system than you do.
Why are you so determined to degrade and criticise our legal processes.???
. You never denied my earlier remark that you are an agitatator for radical Muslim beliefs.
In fact, no-one dared a reply.
Well ,, I'll say it again.. you are attempting to undermine the rule of Law, by suggesting that the only recourse we have is to send this wee bastard home to his ever-loving family. NIX THAT.
The FULL weight of the LAW should be brought to bear on this.
Now is the time... this is the place. Do you believe in human rights and human responsibility.?
If you did.. you would have NO OBJECTION to the application of LAW. No pathetic efforts to undermine our Laws.!!!

no snide remarks or deflections.
You wouldn't suggest sending him safely home, or belittle the impact of his behaviour. You , quite frankly, STINK.