Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:20am:


You seem to have misunderstood the reason this thread was created.

It's sole purpose was to establish the fact that the QLD Court of Appeal is not made up of "faceless men".

"The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

"Catherine is, and always has been, a female.

"Just to avoid any further confusion."

However, if you'd like to provide more information about the judge in the OP, that would be most welcome.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:25am:


Nah... I didn't misunderstand. Whether correct or not, I have my own view on why you created the thread.....that view is unimportant, as on face value it appears to be for the reason you state.

My contribution here was merely a pretty much tongue in cheek effort to discover the depth of your research on Justice Holmes.......just game playing.......you know.....

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:14am:



oh it isnt hard to guess what the MINDSET is of the originator...BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT..

I have gone to all the bother of finding out where I dared to claim these

were FACELESS MEN>>.

sorry if that offends anyone like lisa or andrei..

I realise I have pooped two people off for sure...

anyway I dared to say to my utter shame....this word or words...on the 15th DEC 2015 in the Baden clay thread  reply 184.. in reply to quantum...

gweg then comes thrashing in.. on the 13/1/2016 reply 859.. punching the air....about Catherine....

from there he has really excelled himself with my very own..beash cods to death thread..

it isnt enough they get me on the Baden clay...and in AUSSIES PERSONALLY LISTED RECORD ABUSE THREAD>>.

andrei  whilst you are here... are you ok with all this

being dished out to cods???... I just want an opinion thats all...I just feel if I was denigrating someone anyone like these guys are doing here...

not only would I feel disgusted with myself...

but I would somehow expect maybe a hint from a mod.. that it isnt noice...

am I wrong.. you and lisa obviously chat about this... but you dont seem horrified... by it....

and as you can see they are actually jumping on every word... that cods says and its turned into   more venom..and spite... even though these gentlemen dont see it that way...

andrei I accept full responsibility for daring to say faceless men.. when all the while Catherine was there.. bless her cotton socks..

but apart from that I have no idea why these two gentleman have decided to attack me or show me up or EDUCATE me as they claim..they are doing...

so I hold no responsibility for this LOW CLASS thread....

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94





thats the title....even after one or two attempts to change it..

Quote:


Not an attack.  For more than a month (despite having been advised otherwise twice....once with even a photo) you have been posting that the Appeal Court was made up of men (as though that meant some sort of gender bias....possibly hinting pro Mr Baden Clay and anti Mrs Baden-Clay) and finally the last straw when you actually posted that there was no female Judge on that Appeal Court....when there was.

This Thread is a due correction, not an attack.

And you could kill it all off by simply saying....."Ooops, I stuffed that up."  Instead, you keep trying to justify it.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:21pm:



for you???


not for me SIR.. not for me.. I thin k i said faceless men twice... aussie will fill you in.....

over almost 60 pages????....

you went  29 days before you attacked me....

yes it is an ATTACK A PERSONAL ATTACK....

I have now done an aussie   and gone back through this VERY SO CALLED EDUCATIONAL THREAD...

not a LETS GET CODS THREAD...as you claim

here is what I counted.. between you two gentleman...who are only trying to educate...

well one is the other wants a CONFESSION>..

and as I have been threatened on many occasions he wont back off until he gets said CONFESSION>.


answer me because I will keep asking until you do...

beep beep.

anyway here is what i got..

SHE... was used 5 times

HER was used 5 times

YOU was used 14 times

CODS was used 7 times

lets not mention the subtle puts downs about watching ACA or 60 Minutes...

[I prefer FACEBOOK like gweg] sarcasm there.

it is an ATTACK ON CODS...

you can back off you can claim all I have to do IS CON FESS....you can claim its not abusive in any way you are just educating.someone...

and there is no MALICE>>>

what a shame CODS DOESNT SEE IT THAT WAY and the supporters she has on here do not see it that way either...funny that

thanks to all those who have come out on the side of FAIRNESS

is this FAIR????,... is it WARRANTED???...

has the accused been found guilty

BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT

ONLY IF THEY GET A CONFESSION....


is this a kangaroo court...????


not only found guilty by THIS COURT...

but also embarrassed   and humiliated  in a very

PUBLIC FORUM....

and you think its all sorted...

i

Aussie wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:05pm:







Not an attack.  For more than a month (despite having been advised otherwise twice....once with even a photo) you have been posting that the Appeal Court was made up of men (as though that meant some sort of gender bias....possibly hinting pro Mr Baden Clay and anti Mrs Baden-Clay) and finally the last straw when you actually posted that there was no female Judge on that Appeal Court....when there was.

This Thread is a due correction, not an attack.

And you could kill it all off by simply saying....."Ooops, I stuffed that up."  Instead, you keep trying to justify it.




I CAN "KILL IT"


INSTEAD "YOU" KEEP TRYING TO JUSTIFY IT?...




if only I confess this  INQUISITION  will go away...

something tells me no it wont..




 

Aussie wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:36pm:



you havent learnt much have you...

this is a public forum...as far as I am aware no one set you up to

BE JUDGE UMPIRE JURY AND HANGMAN..

you and your friend think you have every right to humiliate someone at your pleasure...you think you have the upper hand on every thread...and everything is under your CONTROL...

well not this person...I am afraid...I am happy for this thread to be at the top... so everyone can read..

what a little DICTATOR you are..

how you take it upon yourself...to enjoy putting down others...and keeping people in their" place"

how dare anyone who has no knowledge of the law say anything in a thread that relies on the law..

who do these people think they are?? daring to argue with the,likes of aussie and greg..

how dare they disagree with the LAW>.

just who are these people?????....

aussie tells them something and they have to hide to IGNORE it...

  aussie ,and greg  dont put people down they 

EDUCATE THEM...everyone knows that!!...

aussie  even has a special thread called RECORD ABUSE>...so everyone he  dislike will be named and shamed... [well thats the plan]..

.sadly its mainly the same two people that  rush in with their version of abuse...

this isnt abuse is it???

no you have  both said that several times...

its to EDUCATE CODS...

NO MALICE INTENDED...

but then.

you are not being ridiculed and monitored are you?....

your not having every word collected for future use against said criminal...[cods].. we all know you are very very good at bringing up things that happened months even years ago....

and you tell me this will all go away.  if only I CONFESS......

do I worry about your INQUISITION>..

not at all.. it says more about you and your little mate than it does about me....

I think you will find....