Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Rogue union bosses targeted (Read 3431 times)
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #15 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:30am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:23am:
John Smith wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:17am:
half your luck ... I have to go fix a broken toilet  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I guess this forum isn't the only thing that can't handle your crap, eh?  Wink

I'll give Armpit one, that was funny.  For once, armpit made a funny. Wow. I never thought I'd see the day...
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #16 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:37am
 
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


the problem is that unions do not behave like corporations and politicians. they are particulary rogue. stronger regulations and laws are always imposed on groups that will not otherwise do the right thing.

unions and their actions are to blame for being 'singled out'
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #17 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:39am
 
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:27am:
aussie100percent wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:40am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


So you think it's ok for crooks to run Unions?

No, I do not.

Nor do I think it is OK for criminals to run companies or be elected to parliament. Yet the law currently allows that.

If we ban criminals from holding offices in unions, we must also ban criminals from holding any office of responsibility, including being directors of companies or being elected to Parliament.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.



thats not true.  BEHAVIOUR must be equal for everyone, but if a particular group is not going to comply without stringent regulation then such things are more than fine.

all unions have to do is to obey the law and not bully or be corrupt.  But they wont do that ergo, special laws to control them,
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #18 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:44am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:39am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:27am:
aussie100percent wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:40am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


So you think it's ok for crooks to run Unions?

No, I do not.

Nor do I think it is OK for criminals to run companies or be elected to parliament. Yet the law currently allows that.

If we ban criminals from holding offices in unions, we must also ban criminals from holding any office of responsibility, including being directors of companies or being elected to Parliament.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.



thats not true.  BEHAVIOUR must be equal for everyone, but if a particular group is not going to comply without stringent regulation then such things are more than fine.

all unions have to do is to obey the law and not bully or be corrupt.  But they wont do that ergo, special laws to control them,


How is any of what you said different for industry groups, lobby groups, think tanks, corporations, etc?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28481
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #19 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:46am
 
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:27am:
aussie100percent wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:40am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


So you think it's ok for crooks to run Unions?

No, I do not.

Nor do I think it is OK for criminals to run companies or be elected to parliament. Yet the law currently allows that.

If we ban criminals from holding offices in unions, we must also ban criminals from holding any office of responsibility, including being directors of companies or being elected to Parliament.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


Actually, you can't be in parliament if you're a convicted criminal.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61237
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #20 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:48am
 
Swagman wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:34am:
....apparently Unions pay the fines of its officials that break the law?

Therefore there is no deterrent in imposing fines.

More corruption.


You think it isn't the same with businesses except that nobody bothers to catch them for the same type of behaviour.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61237
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #21 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:52am
 
Rogue union bosses targeted

Instead of trying to fix the problem looks like Turdbull is determined to play politics with it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61237
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #22 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:57am
 
Rogue union bosses targeted

The regulation looks like it would mostly apply to union people who are not rogue at all.

There is nothing in the suggested legislation that would go anywhere near limiting it to either rogues or bosses.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 150307
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #23 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 9:18am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:46am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:27am:
aussie100percent wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:40am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


So you think it's ok for crooks to run Unions?

No, I do not.

Nor do I think it is OK for criminals to run companies or be elected to parliament. Yet the law currently allows that.

If we ban criminals from holding offices in unions, we must also ban criminals from holding any office of responsibility, including being directors of companies or being elected to Parliament.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


Actually, you can't be in parliament if you're a convicted criminal.


Incorrect (once again).



Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #24 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 9:22am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:23am:
John Smith wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:17am:
half your luck ... I have to go fix a broken toilet  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I guess this forum isn't the only thing that can't handle your crap, eh?  Wink


Wholly chit armpit did funny  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #25 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 9:56am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:23am:
John Smith wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:17am:
half your luck ... I have to go fix a broken toilet  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I guess this forum isn't the only thing that can't handle your crap, eh?  Wink


keep guessing ... the problem is with where the water goes in, not where the sh1t goes out.

You can add that to the billion other things you consistently get wrong on this forum
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #26 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 9:59am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:39am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:27am:
aussie100percent wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:40am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


So you think it's ok for crooks to run Unions?

No, I do not.

Nor do I think it is OK for criminals to run companies or be elected to parliament. Yet the law currently allows that.

If we ban criminals from holding offices in unions, we must also ban criminals from holding any office of responsibility, including being directors of companies or being elected to Parliament.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.



thats not true.  BEHAVIOUR must be equal for everyone, but if a particular group is not going to comply without stringent regulation then such things are more than fine.

Now you know why corporations are tightly regulated.  Grin

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:39am:
all unions have to do is to obey the law and not bully or be corrupt.  But they wont do that ergo, special laws to control them,

Incorrect. The main problem is an inconsistency of law. Simply making the laws consistent for all organisations will do a lot to fix these problems.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #27 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 10:01am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:46am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:27am:
aussie100percent wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:40am:
Bam wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:37am:
Unions should not be subject to special governance laws that companies or other organisations are not.

Banning the payment of fines against officials by unions? OK - this isn't allowed for companies.

Preventing people with criminal convictions from holding office in a union? Not OK - directors of companies are not subject to similar laws, and politicians are even allowed to be elected with criminal convictions.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


So you think it's ok for crooks to run Unions?

No, I do not.

Nor do I think it is OK for criminals to run companies or be elected to parliament. Yet the law currently allows that.

If we ban criminals from holding offices in unions, we must also ban criminals from holding any office of responsibility, including being directors of companies or being elected to Parliament.

The law must be equal for EVERYONE.


Actually, you can't be in parliament if you're a convicted criminal.

That's going to be a big surprise to Wilson Tuckey.  Cool
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #28 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 10:01am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:39am:
BEHAVIOUR must be equal for everyone, but if a particular group is not going to comply without stringent regulation then such things are more than fine.


really? so what stringent regulations did they bring in for the AWB? Or for the brown paper bag brigade in NSW? what about Getax?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89846
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: Rogue union bosses targeted
Reply #29 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 10:04am
 
Rogue union bosses not targeted


Fixed for ya.......

Why is it, do you think, that only UNION bosses are targeted, unless this is an ideological war.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print