Australian Politics Forum - Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #60 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:46pm

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:36pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

But it will be done by a Liberal government and therefore must be rejected and resisted by all the ideological persuasion they can muster.

that's because righties can't help but twist whatever they do to try and gain a political advantage ... reducing corruption has nothing to do with reducing union powers.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #61 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:49pm

Dnarever wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:28pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:36pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

But it will be done by a Liberal government and therefore must be rejected and resisted by all the ideological persuasion they can muster.

The more likely issue is that it will be attempted by a Liberal government who will stuff it up and produce an unfair and unreasonable list of negative changes aimed more at shackling the union movement and disadvantaging Labor than addressing any problem.

swags already proven that point ... see highlighted section

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Swagman

Gold Member

Offline

Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #62 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 4:20pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:49pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:28pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:36pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

But it will be done by a Liberal government and therefore must be rejected and resisted by all the ideological persuasion they can muster.

The more likely issue is that it will be attempted by a Liberal government who will stuff it up and produce an unfair and unreasonable list of negative changes aimed more at shackling the union movement and disadvantaging Labor than addressing any problem.

swags already proven that point ... see highlighted section

Yep Jonathon, the public service unions are indeed a blood sucking leech on the income tax payer.... Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #63 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:08pm

Dnarever wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:28pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:36pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

But it will be done by a Liberal government and therefore must be rejected and resisted by all the ideological persuasion they can muster.

The more likely issue is that it will be attempted by a Liberal government who will stuff it up and produce an unfair and unreasonable list of negative changes aimed more at shackling the union movement and disadvantaging Labor than addressing any problem.

And there you go. You are already foreshadowing how you will disagree with anything the government comes up with. I repeat... you support the notion of reducing corruption as long as nothing is done that will actually achieve it.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #64 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #65 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:11pm

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

not presumptive at all .... we have plenty of proof . Naturally, you don't understand what you see and so are ignorant of it.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #66 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:16pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:11pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

not presumptive at all .... we have plenty of proof . Naturally, you don't understand what you see and so are ignorant of it.

Proof of what? Proof that union influence is unrelated to its proven corruption?

Are you naturally this stupid or did you train for it?

I have a plant that makes more sense than you and has more value.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #67 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:22pm

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:16pm:

Proof of what? Proof that union influence is unrelated to its proven corruption?

struggling to follow the little ball I see ... Roll Eyes

OK, we'll try again. Proof that the libs are only interested in undermining the unions influence. Influence and corruption are two different things.

the answer to your second question is that I have recently started training for it ... I hope to one day get as stupid as you. And I can certainly understand why a plant makes sense to you when it talks to you. You both talk the same language.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean Reply #68 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:54pm The righties must be draggn their bottom lips , not a one post slamming Crean , unlike those righties who slam the likes of Hewson when he tells it the way it is .
Back to top	IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #69 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:24pm

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:11pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

not presumptive at all .... we have plenty of proof . Naturally, you don't understand what you see and so are ignorant of it.

Proof of what? Proof that union influence is unrelated to its proven corruption?

Are you naturally this stupid or did you train for it?

I have a plant that makes more sense than you and has more value.

Is this plant your friend, longie? Do you hug it good night?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150278
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #70 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:29pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:24pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:11pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

not presumptive at all .... we have plenty of proof . Naturally, you don't understand what you see and so are ignorant of it.

Proof of what? Proof that union influence is unrelated to its proven corruption?

Are you naturally this stupid or did you train for it?

I have a plant that makes more sense than you and has more value.

Is this plant your friend, longie? Do you hug it good night?

That's cruel.

Longy doesn't have any friends.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #71 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:24pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:11pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

not presumptive at all .... we have plenty of proof . Naturally, you don't understand what you see and so are ignorant of it.

Proof of what? Proof that union influence is unrelated to its proven corruption?

Are you naturally this stupid or did you train for it?

I have a plant that makes more sense than you and has more value.

Is this plant your friend, longie? Do you hug it good night?

That's cruel.

Longy doesn't have any friends.

You mean even the plant is repulsed?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean Reply #72 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 9:31pm damn you Alevine .... you just beat me to it!
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61230
Here
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #73 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 10:01pm

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

No unlike your twaddle his statement was spot on, Removing any corruption has nothing to do with restraining a unions proper functions.

May be worth considering that there was no corruption found in public service unions either.

won't have any objection to the tough measures

No they need sensible measures - tough measures are likely to be counter productive.

The statement contained 3 points and they were all clearly wrong.

Tough measures won't help, attacking unions ability to function correctly for political reasons is the wrong approach and the public service unions came out of the process clean.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 89837
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male

Re: Come see the lefties shred Simon Crean
Reply #74 - Jan 10^th, 2016 at 11:35pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:11pm:

mariacostel wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2016 at 12:26pm:

I'm delighted with the lefties' response here because it means they won't have any objection to the tough measures that will be taken to clean up the unions and reduce their restrictive influence, especially in the public service.

see, that's where you come unstuck ... reducing corruption should have nothing to do with reducing unions influence ..... that's a political motive

A naive and presumptive statement. Naturally, you don't understand that.

not presumptive at all .... we have plenty of proof . Naturally, you don't understand what you see and so are ignorant of it.

Choice is not ignorance - it is intent.....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged