random wrote on Jan 9
th, 2016 at 9:34am:
But let's just for fun pick one or two parts of it to explore.
How about ...
1. "What if they learned that the climate models are unskilled,"
Is that even possible? Did a school child write that?
Where have you been for the last 25 years, here are the IPCC predictions vs real life obsevations.

Now when your theory backed up by your calculations isn't realised after an observation period what does that tell you.
THAT YOU ARE WRONG...back to the drawing board.
Its dickwads like yourself these pigs we call the oligarchy are turning into foot soldiers to pass a tax on the air we breath.
I'll tell you one thing though, once this $2 or $1.5 trillion dollar carbon derivatives market is up and running, curbing manmade CO2 emissions will be the last thing on the oligarchies mind, and you my friend will be left with your cock in your hands.
random wrote on Jan 9
th, 2016 at 9:34am:
2. "
[i] ... or that 28 million weather balloons show carbon reduction is fruitless pursuit"[/i]
WTF does that even mean? Please send links to help me out with that one.
Your kidding right you don't know that thousands of weather balloons go up into our atmosphere every day to measure temperature.
Not to mention the satellite data we receive.
Guess what both have failed to find the hot spot in the tropopause that appears in the IPCC and other alarmist computer models.
That's why they started saying that this missing heat has gone into the oceans.
WRONG again... we have the Argo system deployed around the world measuring temperature in the oceans and it hasn't detected this missing heat.
Better get over to sceptical science blog run by a cartoonist with ties to Al Gore so they can teach you how to combat these facts, they may even let you become an algorian.