Australian Politics Forum - They breed them smart at Lib HQ

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10300
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #75 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:29am

Dnarever wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:10am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 5:48am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 9:16pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 4^th, 2016 at 10:40pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 4^th, 2016 at 10:35pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 4^th, 2016 at 10:28pm:

It's probably become more stringent now the Liberals are in charge. Under Labor all one had to do was spin some story about persecution.

You say, probably - meaning you aren't sure. That is assumption. The tests are the same as before - I think. People applying still have to pass medical, character, and identity tests - the only difference is that the LNP has decreed that any arriving by boat, who are not supposed to be punished in any way for their method of arrival, will not be settled here, but will be sent post haste to the Malaria/Typhoid/Cholera/AIDS Belt, where they will make a living selling their daughters into sex slavery or by growing poppies in the Golden Triangle for some drug warlord.......

No punishment there.... nah.....

I studied this stuff at Uni level, but that was in 2005.

Presuming your post is correct, then how does that refute an open border policy when Labor wouldn't 'turn back the boats' once the quota was reached?

It is not the right or duty of government to intercept vessels of a foreign nation on the High Seas, and that means there are no rights adhering to that government to 'turn back the boats' until such time as they reach territorial waters. It is at that point that refugee claimants may legally and legitimately request asylum from an officer of the nation..... so you can see how this legal situation places a government in a situation difficult to win IF the intention is to NOT process those who arrive in this manner.

So no - not turning back boats is not an 'open border policy' - it is strict adherence to Law, and in no way opens the border to persons who will not be detained and processed, thus obviating the entire concept of the border being open, since those people may NOT enter the nation and go about any business they choose, but rather are detained for processing and tests.

The ONLY excuse used to 'turn back the boats', and the only thing that gives that action legitimacy is by adhering to it the label of 'humanitarian act', based on the idea that turning them back is saving them from a watery death.

This is very shaky ground and has nothing to do with border security, but is a humanitarian gesture.. or rather is border security disguised as a humanitarian gesture.

İ'll say it again: without an enforced quota it is open borders.

Your opinion requires a different definition to what an open boarder is to any definition currently in use.

No it doesn't.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #76 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:38am

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:28am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:45am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 5:42am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 10:29pm:

So why do you keep talking about it? The rest of us just wish to pass it and move on with life.

Why does Labor keep talking about it?

Quote:

And you didn't answer, doc, how can someone as educated as you want to ignore the secular nature of our political system?

İ can't follow this line of argument: there should be gay marriage because of ... the secular nature of our political system?

Really, doc? People are only talking a out it becauae virtually everyone except a few conservative nutjobs wants to just get it over and done with.

İf lefties never brought it up to begin with the conversation wouldn't exist at all. İmagine all this time and effort placed on something like unemployment.

Quote:

And the line of argument has to do with providing a valid reason against gay marriage that is secular in nature. Religion needs to stay out of politics.

İ've never argued agianst gay marriage. İ have, however, argued against the normalisation of sh*t punching and gayness in general. This hasn't been based in religion either, but that such normalisation isn't found in history and that normal people instinctively recoil from sh*t.

60% of women partake in anal sex. Are you suggesting 60% of women are not normal?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Bam Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21905 Gender:	Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ Reply #77 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:08am Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:03pm: Gay marriage affects about .000001% of the population. It does nothing to help the working classes. Using made-up statistics does not make your post sound more convincing. All it does is demonstrate that you are willing to lie to make a point.
Back to top	You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument. IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ Reply #78 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:22am Dnarever wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:27am: They breed them smart at Lib HQ The front bench breeding programme. https://www.screenused.com/images/auction_mar13/12564_5.jpg The Liberalosaurusdrongo.
Back to top	IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10300
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #79 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:19pm

Bam wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:08am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:03pm:

Gay marriage affects about .000001% of the population. It does nothing to help the working classes.

Using made-up statistics does not make your post sound more convincing. All it does is demonstrate that you are willing to lie to make a point.

Trying to make this issue more important than it is only further erodes Labor's voter base.

Back to top

IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10300
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #80 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:21pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:38am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:28am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:45am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 5:42am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 10:29pm:

So why do you keep talking about it? The rest of us just wish to pass it and move on with life.

Why does Labor keep talking about it?

Quote:

And you didn't answer, doc, how can someone as educated as you want to ignore the secular nature of our political system?

İ can't follow this line of argument: there should be gay marriage because of ... the secular nature of our political system?

Really, doc? People are only talking a out it becauae virtually everyone except a few conservative nutjobs wants to just get it over and done with.

İf lefties never brought it up to begin with the conversation wouldn't exist at all. İmagine all this time and effort placed on something like unemployment.

Quote:

And the line of argument has to do with providing a valid reason against gay marriage that is secular in nature. Religion needs to stay out of politics.

İ've never argued agianst gay marriage. İ have, however, argued against the normalisation of sh*t punching and gayness in general. This hasn't been based in religion either, but that such normalisation isn't found in history and that normal people instinctively recoil from sh*t.

60% of women partake in anal sex. Are you suggesting 60% of women are not normal?

Can you point me to a time when anal sex was normalised?

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #81 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 10:24pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:21pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:38am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:28am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:45am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 5:42am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 10:29pm:

So why do you keep talking about it? The rest of us just wish to pass it and move on with life.

Why does Labor keep talking about it?

Quote:

And you didn't answer, doc, how can someone as educated as you want to ignore the secular nature of our political system?

İ can't follow this line of argument: there should be gay marriage because of ... the secular nature of our political system?

Really, doc? People are only talking a out it becauae virtually everyone except a few conservative nutjobs wants to just get it over and done with.

İf lefties never brought it up to begin with the conversation wouldn't exist at all. İmagine all this time and effort placed on something like unemployment.

Quote:

And the line of argument has to do with providing a valid reason against gay marriage that is secular in nature. Religion needs to stay out of politics.

İ've never argued agianst gay marriage. İ have, however, argued against the normalisation of sh*t punching and gayness in general. This hasn't been based in religion either, but that such normalisation isn't found in history and that normal people instinctively recoil from sh*t.

60% of women partake in anal sex. Are you suggesting 60% of women are not normal?

Can you point me to a time when anal sex was normalised?

60% of women partake in it, which would mean most probably 60% of men partake in it. That's a majority.

Just because you are missing out does not mean you need to blame everyone else.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61362
Here
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #82 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 10:27pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 10:24pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:21pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:38am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:28am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:45am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 5:42am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 10:29pm:

So why do you keep talking about it? The rest of us just wish to pass it and move on with life.

Why does Labor keep talking about it?

Quote:

And you didn't answer, doc, how can someone as educated as you want to ignore the secular nature of our political system?

İ can't follow this line of argument: there should be gay marriage because of ... the secular nature of our political system?

Really, doc? People are only talking a out it becauae virtually everyone except a few conservative nutjobs wants to just get it over and done with.

İf lefties never brought it up to begin with the conversation wouldn't exist at all. İmagine all this time and effort placed on something like unemployment.

Quote:

And the line of argument has to do with providing a valid reason against gay marriage that is secular in nature. Religion needs to stay out of politics.

İ've never argued agianst gay marriage. İ have, however, argued against the normalisation of sh*t punching and gayness in general. This hasn't been based in religion either, but that such normalisation isn't found in history and that normal people instinctively recoil from sh*t.

60% of women partake in anal sex. Are you suggesting 60% of women are not normal?

Can you point me to a time when anal sex was normalised?

60% of women partake in it, which would mean most probably 60% of men partake in it. That's a majority.

Just because you are missing out does not mean you need to blame everyone else.

It is probably not 1 to 1. something like 10% to 15% of men score 70% of the women.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: They breed them smart at Lib HQ
Reply #83 - Jan 7^th, 2016 at 10:44pm

Dnarever wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 10:27pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 10:24pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 8:21pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:38am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 7:28am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 6:45am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 7^th, 2016 at 5:42am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 10:29pm:

So why do you keep talking about it? The rest of us just wish to pass it and move on with life.

Why does Labor keep talking about it?

Quote:

And you didn't answer, doc, how can someone as educated as you want to ignore the secular nature of our political system?

İ can't follow this line of argument: there should be gay marriage because of ... the secular nature of our political system?

Really, doc? People are only talking a out it becauae virtually everyone except a few conservative nutjobs wants to just get it over and done with.

İf lefties never brought it up to begin with the conversation wouldn't exist at all. İmagine all this time and effort placed on something like unemployment.

Quote:

And the line of argument has to do with providing a valid reason against gay marriage that is secular in nature. Religion needs to stay out of politics.

İ've never argued agianst gay marriage. İ have, however, argued against the normalisation of sh*t punching and gayness in general. This hasn't been based in religion either, but that such normalisation isn't found in history and that normal people instinctively recoil from sh*t.

60% of women partake in anal sex. Are you suggesting 60% of women are not normal?

Can you point me to a time when anal sex was normalised?

60% of women partake in it, which would mean most probably 60% of men partake in it. That's a majority.

Just because you are missing out does not mean you need to blame everyone else.

It is probably not 1 to 1. something like 10% to 15% of men score 70% of the women.

men better be dreamin.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged