cods wrote on Jan 4
th, 2016 at 6:35am:
Merlin wrote on Jan 4
th, 2016 at 5:52am:
ian wrote on Jan 3
rd, 2016 at 11:42pm:
Shorten is gone, a political carcase hanging in the breeze. Even Abbott would beat him in the next election.
Then whyyyyyyyyyy wont labor replace Shorten ???????
EVERYONE knows he is a disaster for labor, WHY THE F**K dont they just replace him??????
Where are all the worried backbenchers ???
The equivalent of the ones the media kept talking about to get rid of abbott.
The media never mentions them now that they dont want to get rid of shorten. They only mention them when they want to get rid of abbott.
THEY CANT...
they are stuck with him thanks to kruddy and the cfmeu...
they are what is known as between a rock and a hard place....
all they can hope for is he resigns....
but then???????
who do you nominate to replace him???????.......
mate its not up to the MEDIA....you have seen the polls...on the one hand you whinge about the media being in control..
then you want them to attack the leader of the Labor party..to get rid of him...
make up your mind...
do your own dirty work....
I am deadset against the backstabbing...
Labor have gone with shorten all the way since he dethroned krudd...and then gillard...
they must have seen something in him they liked..
suck it up.. hes what you have got..you deserve what you get..
Whats wrong with plibersek or albo ?
Im telling you if they put albo in now there is a good chance
he would do very well against turncoat.
Especially in a debate, can you imagine albo's down to earth
talk matched with the this weird trunbull
accent and weird aloof behavior.
Im not asking the media to get rid of shorten, merely pointing out their inconsistency. They are the ones that put the knife into abbott when the polls were down, why are they not doing the same with shorten ?????
Incidentally, its no wonder the polls are so good for treacherous turncoat, a donkey would have the same polls if it had gotten the same favorable coverage that treacherous turncoat has had.