Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
Marla wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 7:01am:
No, it's arbitrary. You stop "twisting it" because you don't respect the Constitution. "States" does not refer to the actual god damn states themselves as a whole.
Of course it refers to the actual God damned states themselves, that is precisely what the Supreme Court of the United States of America said it referred to in every 14th Amendment case including Browns vs Board of Education.
A Wiki argument is a poor man's argument. Try looking up the word Mr. Google Islam:
"a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government."That's arbitrary, not specific. Now there is the Vagueness Doctrine but that's a little off the path here. Nowhere does it say "governmental state" in terms of Federalism but can refer to it in matters of sovereignty. This is exactly what the friggin Tea baggers attempted to do - an overthrow of the Obama Administration by simply deeming themselves a "state." Like you, they didn't read the Constitution must less understand it.
Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
The US Constitution, except for the Bill of Rights is very clearly a document that is designed to limit the power of government, not the people.
You want a crown or something for having to Wiki that?
Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
I'm not running to any court.
Right. Because Islam does not respect sovereign law. It says so in your charter. Yet many "Muzzies" keep running to them to cry foul when Sharia is not recognized as opposed to Constitutional Law.
Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
As for the right to violence...
Let me stop you right there and say F- you. There is no "right to violence." Never was, never will or should be.
Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
..no it is the right to self defense of our rights..."
Huh?
Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
our right to justly acquired property and freedom of worship.
Who exactly is this "our" Kemosabe? What about others freedom to worship? Islam seems to frown heavily upon that.
Lafayette wrote on Dec 29
th, 2015 at 8:59am:
A mob of people coming in to infringe on that right must be defended against in accordance with the standards of self defence, which allows the defender to use deadly force when they reasonably believe that they face the imminent threat of grievous bodily harm or death and that reasonable belief would be trying to stop this mob from attacking the mosque and them trying to use violence to achieve their goal, thus creating a massive disparity of force which would justify the use of deadly force against them.
Interesting. Since many Muslims attack Christan churches, Buddhists temples, and Jewish synagogues almost daily and usually in most cases kill all parishioners tell me where is
their right to violence? Or does no one have the right to protest a Mosque or Islam itself? See, this is what you going running to the courts for.
So please stop with your shortsighted bigoted horseshit. Maybe if Islam was truly a religion of peace there would no worries of any Mosque being threatened by anyone at anytime. Your instantaneous response is one of violence, bigotry and hatred. Show me where in the bugger it says that in the Constitution.
Forum
Pages: 
Mosque attacked, copies of Koran burnt in Corsica (Read 13521 times)
