Aussie wrote on Dec 22
nd, 2015 at 7:28pm:
Quote:Thus, she's innocent in the eyes of the law.
No. Thus, she is innocent.
Full stop.
As above @ gregg.
Not proven guilty for lack of concrete evidence does not translate as being found innocent,
per se, but only means there is insufficient evidence for a conviction
at this present time.
here you go herb.
A judge has upheld an appeal by Prisoner star Maggie Kirkpatrick against her conviction for molesting a vulnerable teenage girl more than 30 years ago.
County Court judge Geoffrey Chettle on Tuesday said while Kirkpatrick, 74 – who played lesbian prison officer Joan Ferguson, nicknamed "The Freak", on the popular 1980s TV show –
might have sexually abused the 14-year-old fan in 1984, it could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.Judge Chettle said there was no independent evidence to prove the allegations.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/appeal-upheld-prisoner-star-maggie-kirkpatricks-conviction-overturned-20151207-glhz7e.html#ixzz3v5bERT7T
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
I like maggie and was shocked when this came out...how ever this is for those who like to split hairs and tell everyone they are right even when they are wrong...
the child I believe was a wee bit disturbed...I am not sure...however I am glad its resolved...I am glad she didnt do time.. BUT... we must put the children first.