freediver wrote on Dec 27
th, 2015 at 8:58pm:
Suddenly you are unsure of yourself? If this is about nothing more than your right to fantasise about coming to the rescue with your little handgun, why bother pretending to know what the repurcussions are?
Do you care whether gun laws reduce gun crime and gun deaths? Or is the truth just one more thing you will sacrifice for your right to bear arms?
I'm not the one here implying that junkies used guns to commit armed robbery before guns were banned in any significant number higher than they currently use them now in Australia. So I don't have the numbers. Do you? If not, then you are implying something without evidence.

Source:
http://www.aic.gov.au/statistics/homicide/weapon.htmlIn fact, the statistics show that there isn't really that great a difference in the murder rates from 1991-20012 even though semi automatic rifles and pump action shotguns were made illegal.
Sure, there may be less homicides involving guns per year but the difference, in the grand scheme of things is 5-10 murders a year less without as many firearms than there were with firearms.
So do I feel that 5-10 murders per year is worth infringing everyone's right to keep and bear arms? Hell no. But it could be 500-1000 or 5000-10000 and I'd give you the same answer.
I don't care whether the gun laws reduce crime or gun deaths because ultimately the right to keep and bear arms is exactly that, a right and as a right and therefore, inalienable.
It looks like more people were killed by knives even before guns were banned in Australia and that remains the case. Will you be campaigning to make knives illegal now?