freediver wrote on Dec 27
th, 2015 at 5:16pm:
So in your NRA-fueled fantasy, a criminal wants a gun, and one just pops into his hand, and there is no way the law can interfere between the desire to posses a gun and getting your hands on one?
And do you think every criminal in the US that wants a gun can get it also? Guns aren't the only weapon used, you know. Even in states where you can buy a gun without a background check through a private purchase.
In fact, in states where most firearms are illegal to purchase, firearms are still used in robberies so clearly making them illegal in those states hasn't worked.
Firearms are used in approximately 40.3% of robberies in the US whereas strong arm, knives and other weapons make up the remaining 59.7%
freediver wrote on Dec 27
th, 2015 at 5:16pm:
And the experience in Australia of criminals frequently having to make do with alternative (less lethal) weapons has no chance of penetrating this little fantasy of yours?
Australian law doesn't designate a knife as being less lethal than a gun. It considers both just as lethal as each other.
One more time, very slowly. I am merely trying to get you to acknowledge that you were wrong to claim that gun laws have no influence on whether criminals acquire and use guns. I am sorry for responding to all your other drivel before checking whether you understood this point.