polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 25
th, 2015 at 8:06pm:
It is an interesting philosopgical question. Even if we take baron's lower estimate of 15 per year since the gun laws, thats juat short of 300 lives saved. For a one off payment of 1 billion.
I reckon i'd agree to cough it up
There is no evidence the gun laws are responsible for decline in firearm deaths, ABS data shows firearm deaths declining from 1980 to 1995.
The decline in our firearm deaths started in 1980 over 15 years before Howard used a scare campaign to push his hoplophobia.
We banned semi auto rifles which accounted for only 27 homicides from 1980-1995, the total firearm homicides was 813 for this period,military style semi autos were responsible for 1.3% of all firearm deaths.
Of course hoplophobes crap their pants at the thought of semi auto rilfes yet ABS data shows they were the least common type of gun for accidents,suicides and homicides,scroll to bottom of link.
www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/productsbytitle/9C85BD1298C075EACA2568A90013934...The cost of our gun laws should include the firearms registry which has also cost over a billion who knows what the cost totals today,Canada spent 2 billion on their firearm registry before they abolished it, there are over 100 Police full time in the NSW firearms registry.
The NSW police minister was on TV saying greater than 97% of all gun crimes are done by people who are unlicensed and use unregistered firearms.