Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print
Was Islam spread by the Sword (Read 13247 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #195 - Jan 7th, 2016 at 11:16am
 
freediver wrote on Jan 7th, 2016 at 8:17am:
As far as I am concerned it was the same state, particularly in the context of whether Islam was spread by the sword.


It would have been a lot easier just to say you really meant 'what Muhammad did' when you said 'what the caliphate did' - instead of inventing this absurd cock and bull fairy tale about some sex slave breeding program, now wouldn't it?

freediver wrote on Jan 7th, 2016 at 8:17am:
it is a bit ludicrous to suggest they were already wiped out  from the huge area conquered by the Caliphate.


No its not - there were no pagans in the territory conquered by the caliphate outside the Arabian peninsular - not in Persia, not in the middle east, not in the near east, not in North Africa and not in Spain. Comprende?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52826
At my desk.
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #196 - Jan 7th, 2016 at 1:41pm
 
Quote:
It would have been a lot easier just to say you really meant 'what Muhammad did' when you said 'what the caliphate did' - instead of inventing this absurd cock and bull fairy tale about some sex slave breeding program, now wouldn't it?


If I intended to restrict my criticism to Muhammed, yes, but I didn't. Why is this distinction so important to you? Do you think the Caliphate behaved better under Muhammed's successors?

Quote:
No its not - there were no pagans in the territory conquered by the caliphate outside the Arabian peninsular - not in Persia, not in the middle east, not in the near east, not in North Africa and not in Spain. Comprende?


I understand what you are saying Gandalf. I just don't believe it. Nor do I believe that they were all wiped out by Muslims within the Arabian peninsula before Muhammed died, but I would enjoy you trying to assert that they were.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #197 - Jan 7th, 2016 at 1:53pm
 
lol why don't you believe it FD? Its a pretty basic fact of history - by the 6th century, paganism in the near/middle east was reduced to the Arabian peninsular. You know who wiped them out? The Christians.

You said yourself you had no idea - so why on earth would you contest this?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #198 - Jan 7th, 2016 at 1:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 7th, 2016 at 1:41pm:
If I intended to restrict my criticism to Muhammed, yes, but I didn't.


Have you grasped yet the fact that when you say "what the caliphate did" you restrict the timeframe to the time after Muhammad?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101499
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #199 - Jan 7th, 2016 at 4:16pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 7th, 2016 at 8:17am:
Quote:
umm no.


As far as I am concerned it was the same state, particularly in the context of whether Islam was spread by the sword.

Quote:
So which pagans did the caliphate encounter?


No idea, but it is a bit ludicrous to suggest they were already wiped out  from the huge area conquered by the Caliphate. Perhaps this is why you were attempting to limit the Caliphate geographically. The alternative is to suggest that they only existed within Arabia and outside the final extent of the Caliphate, and Muhammed was successful in wiping all of them out within Arabia before he died.

Quote:
Where does the 10 million slaves figure come from?


Wikipedia. I posted the link earlier.


I can’t find your link, FD, but Wikipedia asserts 11 to 14 million slaves in the Muslim over twelve centuries, including the 20th. Children of slaves were freed under Ottoman rule if they became Muslims.

But let us compare and contrast. Guess how many slaves were sent to the Americas in the 18th and 19th centuries alone. A small clue: the slave trade formed 5% of the British economy in the early 19th century..

Slaves were not freed for becoming Christian, so I guess we can say Christianity was not spread by the sword.

But I think we can safely say that capitalism was. Freeeeedom, no?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52826
At my desk.
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #200 - Jan 8th, 2016 at 9:20am
 
Quote:
Children of slaves were freed under Ottoman rule if they became Muslims.


Good point Karnal. This proves that slavery was not used to spread Islam.

Quote:
lol why don't you believe it FD? Its a pretty basic fact of history - by the 6th century, paganism in the near/middle east was reduced to the Arabian peninsular. You know who wiped them out? The Christians.


Are you trying to limit discussion of the Caliphate to the middle east? Is there some off-hand comment from me that you would like to use to justify this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_Iran

Christianity has a long history in Iran, dating back to the early years of the faith. It has been practiced in Iran longer than the state religion, Islam. It has always been a minority religion

http://www.historyofjihad.org/africa.html

In the 7th century, the Berbers lived in uneasy peace with the Byzantines, who ruled the coastal cities of North Africa, after defeating the Vandals a century before. The ancient city of Carthage was the Byzantine capital in Africa. Some Berbers were Christians (with a notable tendency towards heresy), some were Jewish, and some adhered to their ancient polytheist religion. Before the end of the century the region faced a new calamity, the traditional rivals of the Berbers, the Byzantines were defeated and driven from Africa by the Muslim Arab hordes who poured out of the Arabian Peninsula and flattened everything in their wake.

https://books.google.com.au/books?isbn=146162908X

Their influence spread among the pagan Berber population so that by the sixth century many Berber tribes had converted to Judaism. In some cases entire Berber tribes in the Atlas Mountains became Judaized.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #201 - Jan 8th, 2016 at 11:45am
 
Quote:
Their influence spread among the pagan Berber population so that by the sixth century many Berber tribes had converted to Judaism. In some cases entire Berber tribes in the Atlas Mountains became Judaized.


Good point FD.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101499
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #202 - Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:13pm
 
Good point, FD. Slavery was not used to spread Islam. The caliphate was motivated by the belief that Muslims never never never shall be slaves.

If you don’t mind me saying, you’re fighting an uphill battle here. The caliphate was probably the most enlightened empire of its time. Jews, Christians and Muslims had their own courts and lived under their own civil laws. The caliphate was the centre of global trade, knowledge and civilisation for centuries. ISIL’s model of a caliphate could not be more different to the Ottomans.

If you want to show Islam being spread by the sword, you’d do better to focus on some Bedouin tribes, including the House of Saud. But if you believe Muhammed, his purpose was to end such tribal rivalry and unite the Arabian peninsular.

The division we see today has been fostered by Uncle, who picked favourites and annointed dynasties in every country in the region, funding coups and deposing democratically elected governments in key oil states such as Iran. The very borders of those states, of course, were drawn up by Europe. And today, seeing a Western vacuum,, even Russia’s weighing in.

To be honest, I’m at a loss to understand how anyone could attribute Middle Eastern politics and power grabs to Islam. The Middle East has always been subject to external empires. The caliphate was the closest the Middle East has come to a form of home rule. Without a doubt, it was more tolerant and inclusive than the regimes offered up  by Uncle today.

The Shah had a secret police trained by Uncle. The Saudis have an execution squad facilitated by Uncle. The Egyptian generals have torture cells with CIA observers.

And Israel has nuclear weapons aimed at every one of these states, all paid for and supplied by guess who.

Can I ask a quick question of my own, FD? I’m curious.

Was capitalism spread by the sword?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52826
At my desk.
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #203 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 7:59am
 
The French model was to spread liberty by the sword. Capitalism was part of that.

So you think Islam was not spread by the sword because it is all America's fault?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52826
At my desk.
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #204 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 8:21am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:30pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:11pm:
the 'hundreds of thousands' dead was muslims vs muslims.  it was not the Allies.  muslims have an apaling habit of murdering each other by the millions eg Iran vs Iraq and who can forget ISIS who ahve killed far more muslims than 'infidels'


When the Nazi top brass were tried at Nuremberg, the "supreme crime" was not the crime of killing millions of Russians and Poles, or even killing 6 million jews - it was the crime of 'aggressive war' - invading other countries unprovoked from which all the other atrocities spawned from. Put simply, no aggressive war, and there is no holocaust and no mass slaughter of Russians, Poles etc.

Invading Iraq is another case of 'aggressive war' - from which all the subsequent atrocities spawned from. Even if it wasn't the US doing all the slaughtering, they enabled it all through engaging in aggressive war: no invasion of Iraq, no sunni-shiite civil war, and no ISIS.

And I'm only going to make this point once - I've been round this merry-go-round too many times over many years - and I'm not doing it again.


Gandalf would you say that the explosion of the Caliphate across the middle east, north Africa and southern Europe, bringing Islam with it, was also a "supreme crime"?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #205 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 9:31am
 
Sure - aggressive war is bad and I don't condone it by anyone.

The differences I suppose were
1. 1000+ years ago, just about everyone was doing it
2. it was not the industrialised, mass warfare that overwhelmingly targeted civilians - that Justice Jackson was talking about - but relatively clean and swift campaigns that only targeted the regime forces (who incidentally were themselves occupiers)
3. Far from spawning unspeakable suffering as the Nazi invasions did - the muslims unquestionably improved the life of the inhabitants and spawned great prosperity in the lands they conquered.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52826
At my desk.
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #206 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 10:52am
 
Would you describe it as a "supreme crime"?

When did "everyone" stop doing it?

Looking at the modern footprint of the Caliphate, how do you explain the overwhelming backwardness of it?

Would you say that the slaves captured were a "target" of the warfare?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101499
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #207 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 3:07pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 7:59am:
The French model was to spread liberty by the sword. Capitalism was part of that.

So you think Islam was not spread by the sword because it is all America's fault?


No, I think Amerika is just a symptom of capitalism. Uncle doesn’t enter and buy up countries for himself, as Mother did. Uncle does it for his friends, the oil, engineering, arms and construction companies. Amerika is sold off too. Uncles subjects don’t profit from this. Amerika has one of the highest violent crime rates in the world. It has the highest incarceration rate. It has one of the highest income gaps of developed nations. Homelessness, unemployment and poverty are rife.

This is the model Uncle exports, and often demands. If Uncle wasn’t running the show, one of his brothers or cousins would. And when Amerika gowes, someone else will.

I don’t know about Islam being spread by the sword, but it seems quite irrelevant, don’t you think? If you can show it, please do. If you can’t, no problem. I’m sure those Ottomans were complete bastards, but their scope and bastardry could not possibly rival Uncle’s.

Take the Saudis - the harshest regime in modern times. It’s beheaded almost 500 people in the last year. It amputates the hands of thieves. It stones women to death. Covertly, it funds the hardest, most fundamentalist militant groups around. It gave us al Qaida, and probably ISIL.

The Saudis are Uncle’s man in Arabia. Uncle trains and arms their troops. Uncle built their cities, ports and power plants. He supports the House of Saud to keep the oil flowing. If the Saudis don’t accept Uncle’s offer of help, they’ll go the way of Saddam, as everybody knows. For now, they’re free to hack heads. Uncle guarantees it.

Who knows? The caliphate probably supported similar regimes in its time. But this is not that time. Uncle professes to support Freeeedom, as do you. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. When the Ottomans put recalcitrants’ heads on stakes outside the city gates, they were sending their message out. Don’t f vck with us.

Today, Uncle uses CNN and Fox News.

You know this, I know this, the entire world knows it. Capitalism is not spread by the sword, but by air strikes, drones and covert action. The entire history of the world, including Islam, pales in comparison.

If you were secular in your world view, FD, you’d set your sites on the real malevolent force at hand. But you’re not, and you can’t.

You blame Islam, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52826
At my desk.
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #208 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 3:53pm
 
Quote:
I don’t know about Islam being spread by the sword, but it seems quite irrelevant, don’t you think?


Should we start a different thread for this tangent Karnal? Or is every thread actually about blaming the US, or whatever dark forces are pulling the strings...
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101499
Re: Was Islam spread by the Sword
Reply #209 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 3:58pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 3:53pm:
Quote:
I don’t know about Islam being spread by the sword, but it seems quite irrelevant, don’t you think?


Should we start a different thread for this tangent Karnal? Or is every thread actually about blaming the US, or whatever dark forces are pulling the strings...


If you don’t like the answers, perhaps you should refrain from asking the questions, no?

Don’t answer that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print