polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 30
th, 2015 at 1:24pm:
provided muslims are free to perform their worship (which ironically we have more freedom in most non-muslim countries than we do in so-called muslim countries).
The "Islamic State" in true Islam is nothing more than a state of mind - a "state" in which a community of muslims are free to carry out their worship. That is why muslims living in a place like the US or Australia have the best "Islamic state" they could ever hope for. After this, the call for a physical and subjugating "Islamic state" somewhere specific in the world is not only redundant - it is superficial, base and a wholly secular political desire.
Irony doesn't even begin to cover it. Why is it that autonomous, self-directing Muslims get Islam wrong (Religion of Peace, don't you know) in so many countries where there is NO opposition to Islam: Saudi, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Labia, Egypt, Yemen, etc, etc.
There a 1.5 billion Muslims and they have not been able to establish a single well-functioning, attractive society - so now they are saying, like you, that the secular, democratic kuffar state has always been what they wanted all along. Very well, the West has given Muslims countless opportunities to have democracy and it always ended in a blood-bath, most recently in Iraq and Labia but also Syria.
Just utter nonsense. You guys will say anything, no matter how self-contradictory.