One woman every seven days - one man every ten...... ring any bells?

How many of those women who kill men are charged, and how many do meaningful time?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 10:47pm:




Are you claiming that one man dies as the result of a domestic dispute every 10 days Grap?

"Grap, if women are more highly represented in child deaths it is because women are by and large more often with the children."

That's appalling - case rests.

That article says one man every ten days from a DV incident.

The issue is that the real issues of Family Violence need to be thoroughly researched and thoroughly looked at, and that means the current approach of 'male v female violence' needs to be thrown away and a new start begun.

This divisive and one-sided approach has already created an escalating war between men and women and surely any sane person could see it it time for it to be abolished, and a fair and even-handed approach made to FAMILY violence in all its forms.

Rose Batty tried to espouse Family Violence but was shouted down and signed up to 'domestic violence' as espoused by the current regime - 'men v women'.  No agree Rosie - no funding!  and surely you can see we need to cut out 'men v women' violence first.. thus trapping the entire discussion in the same mold that has created the problem of today with more and more murders.


You CANNOT exercise violence against one gender as your chosen means to resolve violence without creating casus belli - cause for war.  Capisce?

I would also suggest that proper restitution be made to the countless millions harmed by this approach.

Does government have that much money?  I doubt it.

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 11:01pm:


Link - I provided link...


http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/comment/the-hermit/qa-domestic-violence-program-...

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 11:13pm:


So it's all one-sided and the woman is always the victim?  You do see the error in your thinking, don't you?

Maybe all those women were abusive and the men had had enough?

You really cannot take such a position and expect it to be acceptable, and in the reverse situation you would be on the barricades screaming "Blaming the Victim!".

You do see the error of your ways, don't you?

That is the problem - the total unwillingness of those who take such a huge part in the issues of family violence to actually look at the realities in an impartial way.

Until the 'woman victim - man perpetrator' nonsense is removed from the discussion - there is no end in sight, other than an escalating war between men and women and men and government.

What you are seeing is the minor skirmishes and chance encounters... what if such a war were to become real, especially given the other evils of government of the west in the 21st century?

How many would die then?

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 11:30pm:


That is the essence of the one-sided and feminist 'women victim - men perpetrator' concept that is at the heart of the current brushfire war between men and women.

Seriously, and in all good faith, you need to divorce yourself from that style of thinking - if that is allowed to continue to dominate discussion between men and women, there can only be an escalation in a war that may take millenia - but which women cannot win in the long run.

Violence is not an acceptable solution to any situation, and should be the last resort - and even suggesting that women are 'freeing themselves from tyranny' by exercising violence in many forms, as is the current case, is a certain recipe for disaster.

Any continuation of this current fallacy will result in many more deaths pn both sides, and also of those in the middle.

You need to stop that kind of thinking right now - and get with the program.

So do stupid and short-sighted governments who see that using the power of government to abuse an entire demographic to establish some form of order by exercising violence to reduce violence.

When that ever actually happens - let me know.

I will say again - this current nonsense between men and women, with the government on the side of women without any consideration for realities, is one of the root causes of social unrest and potential civil war in this country.

Do you seriously contend that just such a 'brush fire war' is not going on right now under this regime of 'woman victim - man perpetrator'?

Tomorrow will be worse....

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 7:41pm:


It's the sheer number of these 'new boyfriend' killings and torturings that I've read of over the years that creates the stereotype. 

Okay - let's compromise.

Let's have a program in our schools which teaches the kids to report if anything untoward is happening in their home - or from neighbours.

I was sexually abused (no penetration) by 4 separate people during my younger years - and not once did it even remotely occur to me that I could report these to the adults in my social environment (school, parents, etc).

This inhibition on the part of young victims must be 'taught' out of them.