Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2015 at 6:31pm:
Karnal wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2015 at 1:05pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2015 at 11:48am:
And she was quite a successful Prime Minister. Got more through a tricky parliament than Tony came even close to.
The reason for this is Tony Abbott is the very model of divisiveness. His entire career from student politics on is a history of declarations of war. He even called his book, "Battlelines".
This old chestnut: conservatives are divisive while "progressives" are inclusive. Of course, except if you are Christian, conservative, a banker, rich, successful, a white male, have pride in oneself and history, straight, are family orientated etc. etc. etc.
The real difference is the honesty in their approaches. Conservatives will tell you straight up who they like and dislike. "Progressives" hide all their divisiveness behind feelgood slogans like diversity, tolerance and the like.
Plenty of "conservatives" are inclusive, Mistie. If Abbott was so honest about his likes and dislikes, why the need to be all hush hush during an election? Why the need for false election promises, three-word slogans and policy built around spin?
How about a paid parental leave scheme just to prove Abbott liked women?
Or his non-committal on gay marriage and rolling out his lesbian sister to play gay-friendly?
The Abbott government was the least stable, and the least honest we’ve had in recent memory. I bet you’re ever so glad to see Turnbull in the chair, just like the rest of us.
"Conservatives" and "progressives" alike can breathe again.