mariacostel wrote on Oct 21
st, 2015 at 7:53am:
It is unconstitutional for the federal government to be over-ruled by the states. This supposed agreement is simply a bit of legislation which can be overturned in an instance and isn't constitutional anyhow. Any change to the GST is entirely the province of the federal government. Costello and Howard did this as a sop to the gullible states who swallowed it hook, line and sinker.
Do you begin yet, Grasshopper, to see the very real issue behind The Divine Right of Elected Government, and are you beginning to see what it is you are saying here?
Your very position throws the entire governance of this country into disrepute and shows the paucity of honour within this system.... as well as the very real and present danger of any unfettered right to create 'legislation'......
Legislation is not intended to suit the ends of government - it is intended to suit the ends of Law and of service to the people. We do not yet live in an autocratic state controlled by an elite self-chosen, and history shows us never more than clearly how very dangerous such a position is once foisted upon a sleeping public.
If legislation were passed this afternoon saying that all marias would be incarcerated for life as enemies of the state - would that be Law or legislation? Meditate upon this difference, Grasshopper.