Australian Politics Forum - what the science says:

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

what the science says:
Oct 6^th, 2015 at 6:29pm

When the Earth comes out of an ice age, the warming is not initiated by CO2 but by changes in the Earth's orbit. The warming causes the oceans to release CO2. The CO2 amplifies the warming and mixes through the atmosphere, spreading warming throughout the planet. So CO2 causes warming AND rising temperature causes CO2 rise. Overall, about 90% of the global warming occurs after the CO2 increase.

source: http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21592 Gender:	Re: what the science says: Reply #1 - Oct 7^th, 2015 at 3:14pm Quoting the cartoonist again? How sad.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: what the science says: Reply #2 - Oct 7^th, 2015 at 6:42pm lee wrote on Oct 7^th, 2015 at 3:14pm: Quoting the cartoonist again? How sad. Are you disputing the fact that CO2 comes out of solution with increasing temperature?
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21592
Gender: male

Re: what the science says:
Reply #3 - Oct 7^th, 2015 at 6:59pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 7^th, 2015 at 6:42pm:

Are you disputing the fact that CO2 comes out of solution with increasing temperature?

Not greatly. It can only come out of solution if it was in solution in the first place.

It was more a critique of your source. He's not very reliable. I think he may even have convinced himself about "97% of scientists", by now.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: what the science says:
Reply #4 - Oct 7^th, 2015 at 7:09pm

lee wrote on Oct 7^th, 2015 at 6:59pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 7^th, 2015 at 6:42pm:

Are you disputing the fact that CO2 comes out of solution with increasing temperature?

Not greatly. It can only come out of solution if it was in solution in the first place.

It was more a critique of your source. He's not very reliable. I think he may even have convinced himself about "97% of scientists", by now.

You've got nada buddy

You hate me for owning you but you love me all at the same time: this is the kind of drama people watch

Yeh, buddy- we is ratings winners and you are the star they love to watch making those gorgeous faces : go you

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

ordinaryguy Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 625 Gender:	Re: what the science says: Reply #5 - Oct 7^th, 2015 at 7:12pm Get a room you two
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: what the science says: Reply #6 - Oct 7^th, 2015 at 7:16pm ordinaryguy wrote on Oct 7^th, 2015 at 7:12pm: Get a room you two Still hating those kids?
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: what the science says:
Reply #7 - Oct 10^th, 2015 at 8:38am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 6^th, 2015 at 6:29pm:

When the Earth comes out of an ice age, the warming is not initiated by CO2 but by changes in the Earth's orbit. The warming causes the oceans to release CO2. The CO2 amplifies the warming and mixes through the atmosphere, spreading warming throughout the planet. So CO2 causes warming AND rising temperature causes CO2 rise. Overall, about 90% of the global warming occurs after the CO2 increase.

source: http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

All that CO2 goodness it will be raining fire soon.

All that CO2, all 0.04% of the atmosphere that's 0.0004 parts of the atmosphere will rain fire on us all.

All that CO2.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: what the science says:
Reply #8 - Oct 10^th, 2015 at 9:24am

Ajax wrote on Oct 10^th, 2015 at 8:38am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 6^th, 2015 at 6:29pm:

When the Earth comes out of an ice age, the warming is not initiated by CO2 but by changes in the Earth's orbit. The warming causes the oceans to release CO2. The CO2 amplifies the warming and mixes through the atmosphere, spreading warming throughout the planet. So CO2 causes warming AND rising temperature causes CO2 rise. Overall, about 90% of the global warming occurs after the CO2 increase.

source: http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

All that CO2 goodness it will be raining fire soon.

All that CO2, all 0.04% of the atmosphere that's 0.0004 parts of the atmosphere will rain fire on us all.

All that CO2.

it used to be 0.029% about a century ago

I wonder Why the CO2 concentration is increasing Batman?

poor Batman,

poor sooky sooky Batman

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: what the science says:
Reply #9 - Oct 10^th, 2015 at 10:19am

Are you trying to say that we (the people of this world) as a whole can control the amount of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere.

You are indeed a deluded chimp but more importantly you are a liar.

Man's contribution to the total CO2 budget on the Earth is minuscule.

If the sun gets a few more black spots or their is a massive volcanic eruption on Earth this could potentially double or more the CO2 content.

These events could eclipse man's contribution to the CO2 budget.

But lets look at history, we have had 20 times more atmospheric CO2 in our atmosphere than what we have today and guess what liar there was no runaway greenhouse effect.

Your physics is ass about, temperature controls the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere.

CO2 doesn't control temperature, temperature controls CO2.

You are a liar chimp, apologise right now for misleading people that don't know.

LIAR.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: what the science says:
Reply #10 - Oct 10^th, 2015 at 1:48pm

Ajax wrote on Oct 10^th, 2015 at 8:38am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 6^th, 2015 at 6:29pm:

When the Earth comes out of an ice age, the warming is not initiated by CO2 but by changes in the Earth's orbit. The warming causes the oceans to release CO2. The CO2 amplifies the warming and mixes through the atmosphere, spreading warming throughout the planet. So CO2 causes warming AND rising temperature causes CO2 rise. Overall, about 90% of the global warming occurs after the CO2 increase.

source: http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

All that CO2 goodness it will be raining fire soon.

All that CO2, all 0.04% of the atmosphere that's 0.0004 parts of the atmosphere will rain fire on us all.

All that CO2.

Ajax doesn't know what makes a complex system complex! Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: what the science says:
Reply #11 - Oct 10^th, 2015 at 1:49pm

Ajax wrote on Oct 10^th, 2015 at 10:19am:

Are you trying to say that we (the people of this world) as a whole can control the amount of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere.

You are indeed a deluded chimp but more importantly you are a liar.

Man's contribution to the total CO2 budget on the Earth is minuscule.

If the sun gets a few more black spots or their is a massive volcanic eruption on Earth this could potentially double or more the CO2 content.

These events could eclipse man's contribution to the CO2 budget.

But lets look at history, we have had 20 times more atmospheric CO2 in our atmosphere than what we have today and guess what liar there was no runaway greenhouse effect.

Your physics is ass about, temperature controls the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere.

CO2 doesn't control temperature, temperature controls CO2.

You are a liar chimp, apologise right now for misleading people that don't know.

LIAR.

http://i57.tinypic.com/2v3k5fs.png http://i58.tinypic.com/246qb74.jpg

...what the buggery do you do after wake up time??

Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: what the science says:
Reply #12 - Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:19pm

Catastrophic anthropogenic climate change is not a fact, but rather a hypothesis to be tested against observations. In reality, the catastrophic climate hypothesis is based on a series of assumptions about the way the climate system works and is supported neither by theory nor by empirical evidence. Climate activists have predicted for years that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide would cause an alarming rise in temperature, reaching levels later this century that would bring widespread global disruption and misery. Atmospheric temperatures, however, have remained flat for the last 15 years or so. Since the predicted catastrophe has not actually occurred, activists have worked hard to substitute the notion of consensus for that of science. The catastrophic climate hypothesis must be true, they argue, since so many prominent people, both scientists and others, support it. Many scientists with opposing views have been unable to get funding or have simply been intimidated into silence. It’s the climate activists’ view that represents the true denial of science, harking back to the Middle Ages when the Church insisted that all questions be resolved not by empirical evidence but by committees of experts reading scripture, with dissenters burned at the stake.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: what the science says: Reply #13 - Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:18pm No, temperatures have continued to rise.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21592 Gender:	Re: what the science says: Reply #14 - Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:25pm Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:18pm: No, temperatures have continued to rise. But not at the same rate, and that is why the IPCC call it an hiatus.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: what the science says:
Reply #15 - Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:50pm

Ill fix it for you

Quote:

The warming suns short wave radiation causes the oceans to release CO2. The CO2 amplifies the warming co-operates better with convection by helping to mix long wave radiation (heat) through the atmosphere, spreading warming throughout the planet. So CO2 causes warming AND rising helps to spread the temperature around and out of the atmosphere, while the sun continues to warm the oceans and release more co2 via its short wave radiation

Until such time that the sun decides to go for a holiday.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: what the science says: Reply #16 - Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 5:19pm And when the sun is “on a holiday” solar radiation will not be so low as to reduce temperature increases much at all!
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: what the science says: Reply #17 - Nov 27^th, 2015 at 1:49pm lee wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:25pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:18pm: No, temperatures have continued to rise. But not at the same rate, and that is why the IPCC call it an hiatus. It is phase change: the ice is melting! Didn't you do chemistry class?
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21592 Gender:	Re: what the science says: Reply #18 - Nov 27^th, 2015 at 9:07pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 1:49pm: And refreezing - scary aint it?
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: what the science says: Reply #19 - Nov 30^th, 2015 at 12:15pm lee wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 9:07pm: BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 1:49pm: And refreezing - scary aint it? Wow: look over there kids while daddy takes all your dreams away !! Thanks (trophy) wifey !
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged