Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Ken Wyatt - first federal Indigenous frontbencher (Read 1579 times)
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Ken Wyatt - first federal Indigenous frontbencher
Reply #15 - Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:25am
 
cods wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:09am:
philperth2010 wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
Ken Wyatt is my local member and someone who deserves respect and praise....The Liberal Party have done themselves a huge favour by endorsing such a splendid human being....Lets hope more indigenous Australians can overcome the barriers of bigotry and contribute to our society in such a positive way!!!

Smiley Smiley Smiley

is there any pics of him..

Try the article linked in the OP.

Quote:
I am hoping against hope he is a full blood aboriginal....

Not relevant.

Quote:
well done Ken I am sure you will be a credit to the govt...to my way of thinking your aboriginality shouldnt come in to it...anymore than if you were of Greek parentage..you are Australian and if this is a first... then shame on us...

Wyatt has a chance to make his mark by pushing for an improvement in Indigenous health. You mention the shame of waiting 115 years for our first Indigenous frontbencher, but we have other shame to deal with. In a country where the average life expectancy is over 80 years, the life expectancy of the Indigenous population is 25 years lower and they also suffer from many treatable morbidities.

It's a little known fact that some Indigenous Australians have the most acute eyesight of any people. Yet many of them suffer from treatable conditions that render many of them blind by the time they are 60. It's a disgrace.
Quote:
The record of Aboriginal health is particularly ironic when you look at Aboriginal eyesight. Aborigines have the sharpest vision ever measured of any humans on our planet, but they're also the humans most likely to be blind when they die. Professor Hollows told me the story of how he corrected an elderly (50 years old, old for a Aboriginal!) Aboriginal man's vision back to 6/6 with glasses. 6/6 is what the average white person has. But his patient said "Thank you for trying, but this is hopeless. I used to be able to see much better." And when the good Professor told him the average white person would think 6/6 was excellent eyesight, his patient expressed sympathy for the poor white people who had such hopeless vision, and who would never know anything better.

Your doctor/optometrist measures vision by two numbers. Average vision is 6/6. The number on top is your seeing distance, measured in metres. The number on the bottom is the seeing distance of the average human. If your vision is 6/6, this means that you can see clearly at a distance of six metres, what the average person can see clearly at six metres. (20/20 is the American version of this - they measure their distances in feet, not metres.)

3/6 means that if the average person can see an object sharply at six metres, you have to be as close as three metres away to see that object clearly. 3/6 means that you probably have to wear glasses. Some people are lucky - they have vision which is better than average. If your vision is 6/5, you can see objects at six metres which the average person can see clearly at five metres.

But Professors Fred Hollows and Hugh Taylor have found Aborigines in Western Australia, whose average vision is 6/1.5 ! This means that they can see at six metres what the average person can see at only 1.5 metres. But Professor Hollows also discovered a very cruel fact. About 5% of Aborigines in the Outback will be blind when they die. If a Aboriginal is lucky enough to live longer than 60, one in 4 will be blind, from trachoma and cataracts. This blindness from trachoma is easily prevented, and the blindness from cataracts is easily fixed with a simple operation. But the medical treatment is not getting to where it's needed.

Source
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Ken Wyatt - first federal Indigenous frontbencher
Reply #16 - Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:35am
 
White people die of preventable diseases in Australia. What's the difference? White people don't look after themselves by drinking and eating bad food and die before their time as well. Would it be fair to say that it's an individuals own choice if they don't look after their own health?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Ken Wyatt - first federal Indigenous frontbencher
Reply #17 - Oct 1st, 2015 at 2:14pm
 
double plus good wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:35am:
White people die of preventable diseases in Australia. What's the difference? White people don't look after themselves by drinking and eating bad food and die before their time as well. Would it be fair to say that it's an individuals own choice if they don't look after their own health?

Not if health care is difficult to obtain, which is the case for many Indigenous people.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
mariacostel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Ken Wyatt - first federal Indigenous frontbencher
Reply #18 - Oct 1st, 2015 at 4:42pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:22am:
cods wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:09am:
I am hoping against hope he is a full blood aboriginal....



"People who identify themselves as ‘Aboriginal’ range from dark-skinned, broad-nosed to blonde-haired, blue-eyed people.

"Aboriginal people define Aboriginality not by skin colour but by relationships."

"Racist definitions of Aboriginal identity

"From 1910 to the 1940s white people classified Indigenous people into castes. They defined

"a ‘full-blood’ as a person who had no white blood,

"a ‘half-caste’ as someone with one white parent,

"a ‘quadroon’ or ‘quarter-caste’ as someone with an Aboriginal grandfather or grandmother,

"a ‘octoroon’ as someone whose great-grandfather or great-grandmother was Aboriginal.

"These “one-dimensional models of Aboriginality” pervaded literature of that time. Today these words are considered offensive and racist."


http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/people/aboriginal-identity-who...



And what rubbish is that! You can be aboriginal because YOU define yourself to be? That is like the nonsense of Goodes claiming that the booing was racist because that is how he PERCEIVED it to be!

What kind of world is it where there are no absolute facts and only 'perceptions' and 'self-identification'?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print