mariacostel wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 5:19pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 5:11pm:
mariacostel wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 5:06pm:
Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 4:57pm:
Yes this is about Shortarse and the RC dope!
Not to me it isnt. It is about the criminal unions defying a royal commission. They have nothing to hide, right? They've been fined $20M recently in multiple judgments. And the legislation to reinstate the Building industry commission was blocked before and now, it is being reconsidered int he light of their behaviour.
And this is all really helping Labors cote, right? After all, who wouldn't want to vote for a corrupt Shorten and his deep, deep ties to a corrupt union.
Next election to the Libs by a landslide.
Yes in building the only group worse than the Unions are the employers but we can not do anything about that problem can we, what was needed is a whole of industry look see and to not just target a small part of the problem.
Same with Abbotts Union bashing exercise, sure they have found problems with unions but they all seem to relate to corruption in the business side which is happily swept under the carpet.
It is a fascinating exercise to watch the True Believer in action. His beloved union steals, intimidates, threatens, acts criminally and violently and disrupts the industry costing billions. It breaks the law and violates an RC order. And what does the True Believer do?
SUPPORTS IT.If a business denied you the right to work at all or ensured that your home was blockaded and then lied about it you would be upset. If they entered your home and intimidated you and your family or assaulted you, you would be outraged. And you know what? the rest of us would agree and support you. We would be on your side no matter who it was.
But put the boot on the other foot...
This is why no one takes much notice of hypocrites like you... ever. To you the only crime is to be a Liberal. Other than that, anything goes.
I would call you a moral coward, but that is something of a statement of the obvious.
SUPPORTS IT.Suggesting that both sides should be looked at for their illegal action is not supporting either side ?
Note: I typed this really slowly so you might get it.
Quote:I would call you a moral coward, but that is something of a statement of the obvious.
I would think you would need some sense of it yourself.
Quote:no one takes much notice of hypocrites like you
At least you are fully qualified to comment on hypocrisy being a master yourself.