random wrote on Mar 9^th, 2016 at 12:42pm:
He got in because all the blackies and do-gooders voted for him while many middle class whities didn't vote. Now the middle class voties are voting because they have had enough and they have somebody they like (Trump).

innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 9^th, 2016 at 11:22am:


Not with her dress-sense they wouldn't.

news.com:


THE science is settled: Trump can’t be stumped.

The controversial billionaire has an 87 per cent chance of defeating Hillary Clinton in November, and a 99 per cent chance of defeating Bernie Sanders.

That’s according to the Primary Model, a statistical analysis model developed by Stony Brook University political science professor Helmut Norpoth, which has correctly predicted the last five US elections since it was introduced in 1996.

It comes as voters in Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan and Mississippi have their say in the US presidential nominating race, with Trump picking up the latter two states.

The Primary Model relies on the presidential primaries and the election cycle as predictors of the vote in the general election, and Professor Norpoth says early primaries are a leading indicator of electoral victory.

Trump won the Republican primaries in both New Hampshire and South Carolina, while Clinton and Sanders split the Democratic primaries in those states.

“What favours the GOP in 2016 as well, no matter if Trump is the nominee or any other Republican, is a cycle of presidential elections,” he wrote on The Huffington Post.

“After two terms of Democrat Barack Obama in the White House the electoral pendulum is poised to swing to the GOP this year. This cycle, which is illustrated with elections since 1960, goes back a long way to 1828.”

Professor Norpoth says in a match-up between Trump and either Democratic contender, the Primary Model predicts Trump would defeat Clinton by 52.5 per cent to 47.5 per cent of the two-party vote.

Against Sanders, Trump would take 57.7 per cent versus 42.3 per cent.

Importantly, Professor Norpoth says that result even factors in Trump’s outrageous comments.

. . . .This all assumes Trump, who has been hit with an onslaught of attacks from both rivals and the Republican establishment, wins the nomination.

Over the weekend, a secretive meeting of billionaires, tech CEOs and high-ranking Republicans — which included Apple’s Tim Cook, Google co-founder Larry Page and Tesla’s Elon Musk — put their heads together to work out a plan to defeat the real estate mogul.

And in an unprecedented attack last week, former Republican candidate Mitt Romney (*) blasted Trump as a “fraud”. However, a new poll suggests that attack may have actually helped Trump, finding 31 per cent of Republican voters are more likely to vote for him because of Romney’s speech.

(*) Trump has just won Romney's home state and will win more votes than Romney did in his failed bid for the White House.

He could have a 101% chance of beating the other candidate...but Hilary will still be the next president.

... wrote on Mar 9^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:




Hillary will be in Guantanamo 

There should be a Statute of Limitations on all this historic dirt-digging from way back.

I don't agree with it.

Lol . . .the big money around Rubio and Romney paid for 7000 ads last week attacking Trump, according to Time Magazine. Most of them ran in Florida.

The Donald doesn't hardly need to spend anything. He just announces he's having a rally somewhere and they turn up in their thousands. Sometimes from hundreds of miles away.
You don't have to stick a dagger in my eye to show me the point.

You know, I get the feeling this Romney may be so deluded he thinks he might somehow get the nomination by acclamation. He won't let on of course but I think he dreams about it

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 9^th, 2016 at 3:35pm:




Seems like they didn't get the memo, the voters are sick to death of this attack dog crap.