cods wrote on Jul 23
rd, 2015 at 12:10pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jul 23
rd, 2015 at 12:05pm:
cods wrote on Jul 23
rd, 2015 at 11:52am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 23
rd, 2015 at 11:12am:
Shorten is neutralising the issue.
But for the record, what a person. Completely disagree. It's a shame that human rights has become a punching bag.
really where were Human Rights when kids were being bashed to death on Xmas Islands rocky out crop???..
funny I dont recall hearing a word from them as the world watched 1100 people DIE>over six years...
I too would like to punch them in the head...if they ever get it out of the sand
Where was your condemnation of the Abbott opposition doing everything they could to ensure the drowning's continued for as long as possible ?
you mean he opposed sending them to a country that has THE DEATH PENALTY???....why would he do that?
oh thats right AUSTRALIA IS AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY
unless your a lefty.. then its ok...

to break the rules..especially if it sort of helps get votes..
like Cambodia? One of the most corrupt and authoritarian regimes on earth with some of the highest rates of poverty in the world?
Also Shorten doesn't admit Abbott is right, everyone in Labor knows the refugee scheme is lazy xenophobic populism, but lazy xenophobic populism is far easier than actually admitting you are both wrong and repairing relations with South East Asia and working on a regional solution with the United Nations involved as well.
In fact, there is a high chance that doing the RIGHT thing would actually lose votes as most people here can't hide that they are outright racists and couldn't actually care less if people drowned at sea if they couldn't throw it in the faces of Labor and The Greens.
Lets be honest here, the vast majority of you right wingers would support shooting refugees as they arrive if it "stopped the boats". Like how you support the cover up of torture, child rape and murder in the concentration camps that make up Australia's horrific refugee program.