Australian Politics Forum - Commentary ~ Shorten Topic

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › Member Run Boards › Relationships › Commentary ~ Shorten Topic

(Moderator: Mod.)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Commentary ~ Shorten Topic (Read 467 times)

Mod. Moderator Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1200 Gender:	Commentary ~ Shorten Topic Jul 11^th, 2015 at 2:33pm Open slather.
Back to top	IP Logged

Vic Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 8641 Melbourne Victoria Gender:	Re: Commentary ~ Shorten Topic Reply #1 - Jul 12^th, 2015 at 7:43pm Overall, a good document. Some small typographical errors but it read well and the conclusion was well supported by the body of the text. No major grammatical errors that would impede the logical flow of the document.
Back to top	“Fantastic. Great move. Well done Angus” IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Commentary ~ Shorten Topic Reply #2 - Jul 12^th, 2015 at 7:49pm it read well but I'm not sure Karnal sounded as if even he believed what he was writing ... that could be my impression due to influences from outside of the essay though! Not that it matters, longie ran away anyway, just like I knew he would
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39777
Gender: male

Re: Commentary ~ Shorten Topic
Reply #3 - Jul 12^th, 2015 at 7:59pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 12^th, 2015 at 7:49pm:

it read well but

I'm not sure Karnal sounded as if even he believed what he was writing ...

that could be my impression due to influences from outside of the essay though!

Not that it matters, longie ran away anyway, just like I knew he would

He was not meant to. The whole thrust of this process was to ask people to write an essay supporting a proposition they personally do not believe in. That is the way longweekend originally threw out his challenge.

Karnal has responded, and well done him.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36389
Gender: female

Re: Commentary ~ Shorten Topic
Reply #4 - Jul 12^th, 2015 at 10:37pm

Well the essay was well written, so well done Karnal. It doesn't come across as insincere which i know is no small feat.

You cleverly used what we have come to consider in Shorten as untrustworthiness as a selling point, which whilst not buying my vote, suggests it may buy others.

It cleverly juxtaposed Abbotts lack of skills in the more reptillian maneuverings of Shorten to present a cogent reason why he will not be an abject failure as PM.

It does, however, stop short of giving me any hope that we won't see another term for Abbott and i was really hoping you could pull that off Karnal.

But it
s probably an impossible task.

As it stands, you presented a non-biased report when your objective was to be biased. Clever. Well done. You gave reasonable arguments as to why he is best suited for the top job (over Abbott at least) without giving the impression that you particularly like him.

A very good piece of writing. And you have retained your soul. Well done.

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Lobo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7408 Sydney Gender:	Re: Commentary ~ Shorten Topic Reply #5 - Jul 15^th, 2015 at 7:10pm Good show, Karnal. No way that longy will even attempt to follow up. What is his second favourite insult. Coward, that's it..... Come on, coward, see if you can better Karnal's piece.
Back to top	"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac. IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page