it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2018 at 4:06pm:



http://convexearth.org





How many bees under how many bonnets - sorry - copper pyramids?

Dear Flat Earthers,

How do you explain the earth's magnetic field?

Super Nova wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2018 at 10:57pm:

Flat Earth-The name's magnetism, Electromagnetism..

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2018 at 1:09am:


That tells me jack in response to my question. A video of an electro/magnetic field showing where the wires are tells me nothing.

So, can you explain in words how you guys explain the Earth's magnetic field?

tesla's work explains in depth here ,

the same dynamic, electro magnetism .. thats 2 differing sources

with the same conclusion ..

Nikola Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

Tesla knew Gravity was just a bogus theory and that Einstein was a shill

Tesla knew that Gravity was nonsense,that is why you never
learned about him in school. Instead we were taught the theories
(assumptions) of Capernicus, Newton and Eistein to embed in your
brain that welive on a 'ball'!
Tesla had it right, electromagnetic realm.

here is Neil deGrasse Tyson, he has no idea what gravity is because it does not exist , it is electro magnetism yet everyone you ask in the street will say , oh that's gravity .. ( a lie . )

Neil deGrasse Tyson: What Is Gravity?

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2018 at 6:27am:


But you aren't.  So many contradictions in your claims, so many mistakes...

Firstly, you're still pushing the idea that the sun and the moon float about 3000 miles above the earth shining light down, all contained within the dome around the flat earth, but that still is contradictory to real world observations of light traveling in an upwards direction after the sun sets below the horizon, illuminating the tops of tall objects such as clouds and very tall buildings while the earth's shadow is cast on the bottom of the same object.

If the sun and moon are at a uniform distance above the earth just whizzing around (within the dome of course), this is impossible as light can't bend to that degree without the air of a massive gravitational pull, which you don't believe in anyway.

The real world observations mean, unless the sun and the moon can phase through the surface of the earth or this magical dome around the flat earth, your hypothisis is impossible and therefore debunked.

Problem #2, you claim that,

Quote:


Again, if you bothered to fact check you would discover that the earth's magnetic field is not generated by ferromagneticism which is where the curie point comes into play.

The magnetic field of the earth is caused by a macroscopic electric current, analogous to the magnetic field generated by a hollow solenoid. There is a bistable electric current at the equator of the earth and in the molten core that causes the magnetic field of the earth.

The electric current at the equatorial core is "self-generated", which is probably why it is bistable. The electrical current reverses direction every few hundred thousand years, just like the Sun (although on a much longer time scale).

So the magnetic dipole reverses every few thousand years as determined by examining rock formations.

A ferromagnetic core could not possibly reverse direction every few hundred thousand years. So physicists can say with no equivocation that the core of the earth IS NOT ferromagnetic. So it doesn’t matter that the iron is above the Curie point.

So other than this being yet another diversion away from you answering the questions put to you, the information you've provided, that you're claiming are "facts" has been proven to be wrong, again.

Where to from here?  Are you going to double down and insist that you're not wrong, or are you going to be gracious enough to accept that you've made a mistake in the material that you've not read or watched but just reposed?

many blessings , and yet

oh dear and the antagonists persist , they demand this and they demand that ,

goodness gracious and welcome once again here beloved beings , where evidences and proofs are posted , and yet some , .................beloveds

are getting quite agitated we see here yes and as such we would again highlight ,

it is not one such as I am saying these things , oh no dear one

it and they are evidences that point ,in and from , a scientific perspective , the anomalies that do exist pertaining to, but not limited to the globe earth theory , gravity ,the distances of the sun and moon ..

the agitation is quite/quaint evidence yes and on display ..

this is very interesting and a clear indication that

ones belief system is being questioned ,



and so you are

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯