Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 143921 Gender:	Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl Reply #45 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:19pm ... wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:16pm: In that case, the gay brothers can bum each other all they like. I'd advise them not to let word of it spread though. Agreed, and yes.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 143921
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #46 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:21pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:18pm:

... wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:03pm:

... wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:27pm:

Why do you concern yourself with what two brothers get up to when they're alone?

It's not about what they do when they're alone - Marriage is recognition from a third party.

Why have you introduced marriage into the mix?

We were discussing incest.

Because there are so many similar threads at the moment, that it's hard keeping track of them all.

In that case, the gay brothers can bum each other all they like. I'd advise them not to let word of it spread though.

Why?

People like The Mechanic would undoubtedly resort to physical violence on hearing of such a thing.

I couldn't care less what the two brothers did, however, there are some very unstable, irrational and violent people in this forum.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77045
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #47 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:14pm:

Resolute wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am:

poll added

And why did we know that this "poll" was inserted by you? I'd say that all of those questions accurately describe or are particularly relevant to you Jack!

I didn't see any other questions Undecided

maybe he has his 'special' glasses on?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #48 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:28pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:18pm:

... wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:03pm:

... wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:27pm:

Why do you concern yourself with what two brothers get up to when they're alone?

It's not about what they do when they're alone - Marriage is recognition from a third party.

Why have you introduced marriage into the mix?

We were discussing incest.

Because there are so many similar threads at the moment, that it's hard keeping track of them all.

In that case, the gay brothers can bum each other all they like. I'd advise them not to let word of it spread though.

Why?

Because they probably wouldn't be invited to dinner parties anymore.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98414

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #49 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:47pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:05pm:

Resolute wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am:

poll added

And why did we know that this "poll" was inserted by you? I'd say that all of those questions accurately describe or are particularly relevant to you Jack!

not real bright are you? There was only one question ... 'which best describes longstupidone' ..

That's a very hard question, JS. Here's a thread started by Longy on legalizing incest, but Longy doesn't appear to have the faintest idea why it's illegal in the first place.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #50 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:14pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:42pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:27pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:30am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:12am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:41am:

and anyhow, our resident gay_incest_poste (greens_lose) is on record as saying there is nothing wrong with adult incest. Remember the gay brothers who didnt know it?

Apart from it being "icky", what do you think is wrong with it?

(I think it's "ickky" too, by the way).

you need to have the cultural, legal, ethical, moral and genetic reasons to oppose incest told to you? it is historys #1 taboo.

It's "icky". We all agree on that.

What else about it bothers you?

If the two brothers you mentioned were doing whatever they want to do in the privacy of their own home, why does it concern you?

You are lathering up the slippery slope with KY jelly, gweggowy.

I'm staying on the level, though.

You're the one continually mounting the slope.

Why do you concern yourself with what two brothers get up to when they're alone?

and what if they are underage?

Then the answer is clearly 'no'.

There you go, that was easy.

We got off that slippery old slope with no problems at all.

Now, back to the question you're avoiding ... ? Undecided

why shoudl underage be a problem?

Kiddies are too young to give informed consent.

I'm surprised that you're advocating such a thing.

So, the answer to the question you've been asked is ... ?

im not talking about kids, I am talking about post-pubescents. it is only relatively recently that we have criminalise adolescent sex and so I ask again, since you are pro-incest, why should age of consent (post pubsecent) be any consideration to you? what they do in private is their own affair, right? that is your argument.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #51 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:42pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:27pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:30am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:12am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:41am:

and anyhow, our resident gay_incest_poste (greens_lose) is on record as saying there is nothing wrong with adult incest. Remember the gay brothers who didnt know it?

Apart from it being "icky", what do you think is wrong with it?

(I think it's "ickky" too, by the way).

you need to have the cultural, legal, ethical, moral and genetic reasons to oppose incest told to you? it is historys #1 taboo.

It's "icky". We all agree on that.

What else about it bothers you?

If the two brothers you mentioned were doing whatever they want to do in the privacy of their own home, why does it concern you?

You are lathering up the slippery slope with KY jelly, gweggowy.

I'm staying on the level, though.

You're the one continually mounting the slope.

Why do you concern yourself with what two brothers get up to when they're alone?

and what if they are underage?

Then the answer is clearly 'no'.

There you go, that was easy.

We got off that slippery old slope with no problems at all.

Now, back to the question you're avoiding ... ? Undecided

why shoudl underage be a problem?

Kiddies are too young to give informed consent.

I'm surprised that you're advocating such a thing.

So, the answer to the question you've been asked is ... ?

im not talking about kids, I am talking about post-pubescents. it is only relatively recently that we have criminalise adolescent sex and so I ask again, since you are pro-incest, why should age of consent (post pubsecent) be any consideration to you? what they do in private is their own affair, right? that is your argument.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #52 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:25pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:05pm:

Resolute wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am:

poll added

And why did we know that this "poll" was inserted by you? I'd say that all of those questions accurately describe or are particularly relevant to you Jack!

not real bright are you? There was only one question ... 'which best describes longstupidone' ..

That's a very hard question, JS. Here's a thread started by Longy on legalizing incest, but Longy doesn't appear to have the faintest idea why it's illegal in the first place.

oh I know alright, but based on the long line of PRO-INCEST posters here I would like to know if THEY know. And ironically they dont support 'incest equality' but only gay incest. FUnny how gays claim equality when it suits them and the rest of the time, 'not interested'.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 143921
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #53 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:26pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:42pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:27pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:30am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:12am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:41am:

and anyhow, our resident gay_incest_poste (greens_lose) is on record as saying there is nothing wrong with adult incest. Remember the gay brothers who didnt know it?

Apart from it being "icky", what do you think is wrong with it?

(I think it's "ickky" too, by the way).

you need to have the cultural, legal, ethical, moral and genetic reasons to oppose incest told to you? it is historys #1 taboo.

It's "icky". We all agree on that.

What else about it bothers you?

If the two brothers you mentioned were doing whatever they want to do in the privacy of their own home, why does it concern you?

You are lathering up the slippery slope with KY jelly, gweggowy.

I'm staying on the level, though.

You're the one continually mounting the slope.

Why do you concern yourself with what two brothers get up to when they're alone?

and what if they are underage?

Then the answer is clearly 'no'.

There you go, that was easy.

We got off that slippery old slope with no problems at all.

Now, back to the question you're avoiding ... ? Undecided

why shoudl underage be a problem?

Kiddies are too young to give informed consent.

I'm surprised that you're advocating such a thing.

So, the answer to the question you've been asked is ... ?

im not talking about kids, I am talking about post-pubescents. it is only relatively recently that we have criminalise adolescent sex and so I ask again, since you are pro-incest, why should age of consent (post pubsecent) be any consideration to you? what they do in private is their own affair, right? that is your argument.

It's a consideration to me because I don't condone underage sex, Longy.

Now, are you going to answer the question or not?

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98414

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #54 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:37pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:25pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:05pm:

Resolute wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am:

poll added

And why did we know that this "poll" was inserted by you? I'd say that all of those questions accurately describe or are particularly relevant to you Jack!

not real bright are you? There was only one question ... 'which best describes longstupidone' ..

That's a very hard question, JS. Here's a thread started by Longy on legalizing incest, but Longy doesn't appear to have the faintest idea why it's illegal in the first place.

oh I know alright, but based on the long line of PRO-INCEST posters here I would like to know if THEY know. And ironically they dont support 'incest equality' but only gay incest. FUnny how gays claim equality when it suits them and the rest of the time, 'not interested'.

I’m interested, Longy, but you won’t say. No one has supported incest here, so it sounds like you’re just looking for an excuse not to say what you think.

Self censorship, eh? Most admirable.

But I am curious about your tendency to refuse to explain your views, but demand answers from others. If anyone asked me something, I’d be happy to tell them what I thought.

Are you trying to cover something up here?

This is an important issue. After all, you started a thread on it.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #55 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:26pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:42pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 1:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:27pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:30am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:12am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:41am:

and anyhow, our resident gay_incest_poste (greens_lose) is on record as saying there is nothing wrong with adult incest. Remember the gay brothers who didnt know it?

Apart from it being "icky", what do you think is wrong with it?

(I think it's "ickky" too, by the way).

you need to have the cultural, legal, ethical, moral and genetic reasons to oppose incest told to you? it is historys #1 taboo.

It's "icky". We all agree on that.

What else about it bothers you?

If the two brothers you mentioned were doing whatever they want to do in the privacy of their own home, why does it concern you?

You are lathering up the slippery slope with KY jelly, gweggowy.

I'm staying on the level, though.

You're the one continually mounting the slope.

Why do you concern yourself with what two brothers get up to when they're alone?

and what if they are underage?

Then the answer is clearly 'no'.

There you go, that was easy.

We got off that slippery old slope with no problems at all.

Now, back to the question you're avoiding ... ? Undecided

why shoudl underage be a problem?

Kiddies are too young to give informed consent.

I'm surprised that you're advocating such a thing.

So, the answer to the question you've been asked is ... ?

im not talking about kids, I am talking about post-pubescents. it is only relatively recently that we have criminalise adolescent sex and so I ask again, since you are pro-incest, why should age of consent (post pubsecent) be any consideration to you? what they do in private is their own affair, right? that is your argument.

It's a consideration to me because I don't condone underage sex, Longy.

Now, are you going to answer the question or not?

but you condone incest??? age of consent is for post-prepubescents and artificial construct that out modern society has chose to employ. Incest however is quite different and yet you seem quite okay with it - as long as it is gay incest. none of this permitting heterosexuality business. right?

your hypocrisy is quite astonishing in this.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #56 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:51pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:37pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:25pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 3:05pm:

Resolute wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am:

poll added

And why did we know that this "poll" was inserted by you? I'd say that all of those questions accurately describe or are particularly relevant to you Jack!

not real bright are you? There was only one question ... 'which best describes longstupidone' ..

That's a very hard question, JS. Here's a thread started by Longy on legalizing incest, but Longy doesn't appear to have the faintest idea why it's illegal in the first place.

oh I know alright, but based on the long line of PRO-INCEST posters here I would like to know if THEY know. And ironically they dont support 'incest equality' but only gay incest. FUnny how gays claim equality when it suits them and the rest of the time, 'not interested'.

I’m interested, Longy, but you won’t say. No one has supported incest here, so it sounds like you’re just looking for an excuse not to say what you think.

Self censorship, eh? Most admirable.

But I am curious about your tendency to refuse to explain your views, but demand answers from others. If anyone asked me something, I’d be happy to tell them what I thought.

Are you trying to cover something up here?

This is an important issue. After all, you started a thread on it.

you really can be an idiot carnal. Greens_lose has already EXPLICITLY support gay incest and peccahead is implicitly doing the same.

now move aside unless you wont to contribute a meaningful statement to the topic and therefore stun us all.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 143921
Gender: male

Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #57 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:56pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:37pm:

But I am curious about your tendency to refuse to explain your views, but demand answers from others. If anyone asked me something, I’d be happy to tell them what I thought.

Are you trying to cover something up here?

Yes, one can only assume that he is covering something up here.

A simple question, and he avoids it at all costs.

Very strange.

Back to top

IP Logged

____ Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 33410 Australia Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #58 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm Liar liar pants on fire old man. I did not. I asked a question which you still haven't answered. Asking doesn't mean support.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 98414	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #59 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:03pm I’ve posed a meaningful question, Longy. You’ve refused to answer. The question on everyone’s lips now is why. We’ll make up our own minds on this, but why don’t you just take a stab?
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »