Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #195 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:37pm

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:23pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Firstly, i think you're afraid of taking Karnal on.

Secondly, what are the rules?

250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to.

Seems pretty straight forward. Which aspects of these 'rules' do you fear Karnal would not be able to follow?

have you ever read a Karnal post that is serious? or on topic? or making a serious point? He thinks he is a comedian despite years of epic failure and the fact that very few even know that is what he is attempting.

I disagree strongly with peccahead and Bam but beleive they have the intelligence to give it a good run. Character however is still to be seen. Karnal however shows neither talent, intelligence or commitment. And unless he is hiding it well, he seems intellectually limited as well.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36073
Gender: female

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #196 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:40pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:35pm:

Quote:

250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to.

Make it a thousand and I'll accept your offer.

I couldn't possibly sell a man like Mr Abbott in anything less.

You'd need a really long shower afterwards.

... with a wire brush and solvol. Scalding hot water.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #197 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:40pm 10 Royal Families Riddled With Incest
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 98553

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #198 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:03pm

Quote:

Have you ever read a Karnal post that is serious? or on topic? or making a serious point? He thinks he is a comedian despite years of epic failure and the fact that very few even know that is what he is attempting.

I disagree strongly with peccahead and Bam but beleive they have the intelligence to give it a good run. Character however is still to be seen. Karnal however shows neither talent, intelligence or commitment. And unless he is hiding it well, he seems intellectually limited as well.

Oh, I know. It should be pretty easy for a published essayist like you to win, Longy.

Shall we put something on it to make it interesting?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36073
Gender: female

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #199 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:08pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:23pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Firstly, i think you're afraid of taking Karnal on.

Secondly, what are the rules?

250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to.

Seems pretty straight forward. Which aspects of these 'rules' do you fear Karnal would not be able to follow?

have you ever read a Karnal post that is serious? or on topic? or making a serious point? He thinks he is a comedian despite years of epic failure and the fact that very few even know that is what he is attempting.

I disagree strongly with peccahead and Bam but beleive they have the intelligence to give it a good run. Character however is still to be seen. Karnal however shows neither talent, intelligence or commitment. And unless he is hiding it well, he seems intellectually limited as well.

I've seen plenty of serious posts from Karnal. But even when Karnal is taking the piss he's the cleverest person on this forum by some considerable way.

If you're not afraid, take him up on it. According to you, you've nothing to lose.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 77287
Gender: male

Re: Age doesn't matter to Longy
Reply #200 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:30pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:26pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

Since my writing (of articles) is so good ...

I'd like to see one of those articles.

apparently a post on a forum is now an 'article'

and that level of literary ignorance is why you are not invited. it would be like debating a child... with a intellectual disability... in a bubble... while asleep.

and you claim to be a writer? Grin

I even put up the definition of an 'article' for you ... you know, a comment on a forum wasn't in it.

I know you think that everything you say is gold, and that's probably why you think a comment by you is an article, but you're deluded.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 98553	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #201 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:45pm it_is_the_light wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:40pm: 10 Royal Families Riddled With Incest It's legal for them, Light. Longy's hoping to get the law changed for the rest of us.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 77287
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #202 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:48pm

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:08pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:23pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Firstly, i think you're afraid of taking Karnal on.

Secondly, what are the rules?

250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to.

Seems pretty straight forward. Which aspects of these 'rules' do you fear Karnal would not be able to follow?

have you ever read a Karnal post that is serious? or on topic? or making a serious point? He thinks he is a comedian despite years of epic failure and the fact that very few even know that is what he is attempting.

I disagree strongly with peccahead and Bam but beleive they have the intelligence to give it a good run. Character however is still to be seen. Karnal however shows neither talent, intelligence or commitment. And unless he is hiding it well, he seems intellectually limited as well.

I've seen plenty of serious posts from Karnal. But even when Karnal is taking the piss he's the cleverest person on this forum by some considerable way.

If you're not afraid, take him up on it. According to you, you've nothing to lose.

I agree ... the ones who think Karnal's an idiot are the ones to stupid to see what he's really saying.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36073
Gender: female

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #203 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 12:07am

So Longy, you've got at least 2 forum members who say Karnal is the most intelligent forum member we have. Others (at least one) have said the same before.

Will you accept the challenge you yourself laid down?

If you really think Karnal is an idiot (poor you), what have you to lose?

1000 words arguing something you don't believe. Karnal will argue Abbott is a great PM ... you will argue Shorten is the best possible leader for the country.

We will vote.

Come on Longy. Put your money where your mouth is.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 144294
Gender: male

What's in Longy's mouth?
Reply #204 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 1:08am

mothra wrote on Jul 5^th, 2015 at 12:07am:

So Longy, you've got at least 2 forum members who say Karnal is the most intelligent forum member we have. Others (at least one) have said the same before.

Will you accept the challenge you yourself laid down?

If you really think Karnal is an idiot (poor you), what have you to lose?

1000 words arguing something you don't believe. Karnal will argue Abbott is a great PM ... you will argue Shorten is the best possible leader for the country.

We will vote.

Come on Longy. Put your money where your mouth is.

His mouth is full.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36073 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #205 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 1:30am Speaking of the one other who have claimed it before ...
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Peccahead is in favour of incest
Reply #206 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 8:56am

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:12am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:41am:

and anyhow, our resident gay_incest_poste (greens_lose) is on record as saying there is nothing wrong with adult incest. Remember the gay brothers who didnt know it?

Apart from it being "icky", what do you think is wrong with it?

(I think it's "ickky" too, by the way).

you need to have the cultural, legal, ethical, moral and genetic reasons to oppose incest told to you? it is historys #1 taboo.

Aren't uo you a monarchist?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Age doesn't matter to Longy
Reply #207 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 9:08am

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 8:30pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:26pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

Since my writing (of articles) is so good ...

I'd like to see one of those articles.

apparently a post on a forum is now an 'article'

and that level of literary ignorance is why you are not invited. it would be like debating a child... with a intellectual disability... in a bubble... while asleep.

and you claim to be a writer? Grin

I even put up the definition of an 'article' for you ... you know, a comment on a forum wasn't in it.

I know you think that everything you say is gold, and that's probably why you think a comment by you is an article, but you're deluded.

hey dimwit... what happens to an article that gets copied from another source eg the ABC and then copied into the forum post box. does it magically become 'just a post'?

work it out.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #208 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 9:10am

mothra wrote on Jul 5^th, 2015 at 12:07am:

So Longy, you've got at least 2 forum members who say Karnal is the most intelligent forum member we have. Others (at least one) have said the same before.

Will you accept the challenge you yourself laid down?

If you really think Karnal is an idiot (poor you), what have you to lose?

1000 words arguing something you don't believe. Karnal will argue Abbott is a great PM ... you will argue Shorten is the best possible leader for the country.

We will vote.

Come on Longy. Put your money where your mouth is.

one is JS and the other is you. the former is really quite dim and you havent exactly set the nobel prize committee on fire either.

it is Bam and Pecca who have declared I couldnt possibly have written my article and therefore the challenge is up to them. Besides, if Karnal wants to demonstrate that he can be both intelligent and serious then he has plenty of opportunity to do so and yet hasnt.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 111840 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #209 - Jul 5^th, 2015 at 9:14am Longy has been saying since 2007 that he has a BSc - but he told Lisa another story - an even higher degree not related to science. What a lying loser - now caught out.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »