Australian Politics Forum - IPCC models vs Observed Data

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21376
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #45 - May 28^th, 2015 at 7:21pm

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

Actually, I was going to say that Marla comes across as a numpty, an airhead. That it seemed she went to college on a cheerleading scholarship.

I was then going to go on to say that should that characterisation be incorrect, she could post a reasoned argument, with references, rather than trite cliches.

Does that fit better what you want?

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #46 - May 28^th, 2015 at 7:37pm

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

Try reading some of the posts by other pro-warming people on here, if you want to see personal attacks.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #47 - May 28^th, 2015 at 8:53pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:37pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

Try reading some of the posts by other pro-warming people on here, if you want to see personal attacks.

You have to admit that you do deserve everything you receive in this forum.

Be fair

None of the personal remarks directed at you have been inaccurate

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #48 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:05pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 8:53pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:37pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

Try reading some of the posts by other pro-warming people on here, if you want to see personal attacks.

You have to admit that you do deserve everything you receive in this forum.

Be fair

None of the personal remarks directed at you have been inaccurate

Because I don't believe in the AGW???
No, none have been deserved, OR accurate.

*edit Although I do understand why you lot responds as you do. It must be hard to argue rationally and politely when your position and beliefs are crashing down around you. Abuse, especially unwarranted abuse, is the only way you can protect your self-esteem.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #49 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:43pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:05pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 8:53pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:37pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

Try reading some of the posts by other pro-warming people on here, if you want to see personal attacks.

You have to admit that you do deserve everything you receive in this forum.

Be fair

None of the personal remarks directed at you have been inaccurate

Because I don't believe in the AGW???
No, none have been deserved, OR accurate.

*edit Although I do understand why you lot responds as you do. It must be hard to argue rationally and politely when your position and beliefs are crashing down around you. Abuse, especially unwarranted abuse, is the only way you can protect your self-esteem.

According to my log book gizmo , of the 237 abuse type attacks directed at you all but 3 can be considered inaccurate or unfair. The remaining 234 are accurate, fair and necessary.

You bring this all upon yourself by continually disseminating misinformation and deceptions in this forum.

This forum deserves better from you.

A good start would be for you to apologise in writing, then you can work on regaining some respect and credibility in here. Looks at the down hill spiral Jethro has taken since his Dr Sircus circus?

Do the right thing mate - Its not too late mate - come on, it will liberate your soul in the long term and you will be able to love children again and rejoice in their smiling faces..

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #50 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:44pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:05pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 8:53pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:37pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

Try reading some of the posts by other pro-warming people on here, if you want to see personal attacks.

You have to admit that you do deserve everything you receive in this forum.

Be fair

None of the personal remarks directed at you have been inaccurate

Because I don't believe in the AGW???
No, none have been deserved, OR accurate.

*edit Although I do understand why you lot responds as you do. It must be hard to argue rationally and politely when your position and beliefs are crashing down around you. Abuse, especially unwarranted abuse, is the only way you can protect your self-esteem.

According to my log book gizmo , of the 237 abuse type attacks directed at you all but 3 can be considered inaccurate or unfair. The remaining 234 are accurate, fair and necessary.

You bring this all upon yourself by continually disseminating misinformation and deceptions in this forum.

This forum deserves better from you.

A good start would be for you to apologise in writing, then you can work on regaining some respect and credibility in here.

Do the right thing mate - come on, it will liberate yor soul in the long term and you will be able to love children again and rejoice in their smiling faces..

http://www.littlelandplaygym.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/group-of-kids-smilin...

Then your log book is as inaccurate as everything else you post.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #51 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:50pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:44pm:

Then your log book is as inaccurate as everything else you post.

You see gizmo? The data and facts are presented to you - they stare you square in the face and you close your eyes to the truth

I am starting to wonder whether you will ever love the children again.

Look at their faces gizmo - why do you want to sacrifice them on the altar of a fire laden scorched planet? Haven't you got a beating heart in your chest man?

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Rider

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #52 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:58pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:50pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:44pm:

Then your log book is as inaccurate as everything else you post.

You see gizmo? The data and facts are presented to you - they stare you square in the face and you close your eyes to the truth

I am starting to wonder whether you will ever love the children again.

Look at their faces gizmo - why do you want to sacrifice them on the altar of a fire laden scorched planet? Haven't you got a beating heart in your chest man?

http://stylepantry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/kids-smiling.jpg

Oh when climate science (lol pun intended) meets emotional irrelevance. Well done Chump, you have nailed it today..not.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #53 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:58pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:50pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:44pm:

Then your log book is as inaccurate as everything else you post.

You see gizmo? The data and facts are presented to you - they stare you square in the face and you close your eyes to the truth

I am starting to wonder whether you will ever love the children again.

Look at their faces gizmo - why do you want to sacrifice them on the altar of a fire laden scorched planet? Haven't you got a beating heart in your chest man?

http://stylepantry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/kids-smiling.jpg

LOL ah yes, the "why do you hate the children" response.........a sad and hopeless gambit, used when you can't refute the other person's evidence.

The children aren't in any danger from this mythical 'fire laden scorched planet', they are more danger from a cold and desolate planet but the greatest risk is suffering from poverty and economic collapse when the idiot warmists try to stop a natural occurrence (natural global warming) by throwing vast amounts of money down the toilet.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #54 - May 28^th, 2015 at 10:06pm

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

She hasn't come up with one piece of evidence or a good argument, all she talks about is the kotch brothers and big oil.

A cork head indeed.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 11070 Australia Gender:	Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data Reply #55 - May 28^th, 2015 at 10:09pm You're right on gizmo, as soon as chimp is lost for words he pulls out "child hater" "children's future" This is what they must be told to do at the AGW church.
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #56 - May 28^th, 2015 at 10:59pm

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 10:06pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm:

That's real science.

No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science.

I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.

Frankly my dear I don't think you would know good science if it smacked you between the eyes.

Running commentary with no facts to back you up..??

You're not chimps sister are you.......!!!!!!

So now we move on to personal attacks and misogyny? Why does this not surprise me?

She hasn't come up with one piece of evidence or a good argument, all she talks about is the kotch brothers and big oil.

A cork head indeed.

Ajax doesn't like evidence Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data Reply #57 - May 28^th, 2015 at 11:00pm Ajax wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 10:09pm: You're right on gizmo, as soon as chimp is lost for words he pulls out "child hater" "children's future" This is what they must be told to do at the AGW church. lol, The Jevons Paradox is strong with this one
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #58 - May 28^th, 2015 at 11:02pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:50pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:44pm:

Then your log book is as inaccurate as everything else you post.

You see gizmo? The data and facts are presented to you - they stare you square in the face and you close your eyes to the truth

I am starting to wonder whether you will ever love the children again.

Look at their faces gizmo - why do you want to sacrifice them on the altar of a fire laden scorched planet? Haven't you got a beating heart in your chest man?

http://stylepantry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/kids-smiling.jpg

LOL ah yes, the "why do you hate the children" response.........a sad and hopeless gambit, used when you can't refute the other person's evidence.

The children aren't in any danger from this mythical 'fire laden scorched planet', they are more danger from a cold and desolate planet but the greatest risk is suffering from poverty and economic collapse when the idiot warmists try to stop a natural occurrence (natural global warming) by throwing vast amounts of money down the toilet.

Gizmo doesn't even agree with the products of combustion now Roll Eyes

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #59 - May 28^th, 2015 at 11:03pm

Rider wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:50pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 9:44pm:

Then your log book is as inaccurate as everything else you post.

You see gizmo? The data and facts are presented to you - they stare you square in the face and you close your eyes to the truth

I am starting to wonder whether you will ever love the children again.

Look at their faces gizmo - why do you want to sacrifice them on the altar of a fire laden scorched planet? Haven't you got a beating heart in your chest man?

http://stylepantry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/kids-smiling.jpg

Oh when climate science (lol pun intended) meets emotional irrelevance. Well done Chump, you have nailed it today..not.

Rider forgets what warren buffet said about money and emotion!!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged