Australian Politics Forum - IPCC models vs Observed Data

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #15 - May 27^th, 2015 at 7:30pm

Ajax wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 6:32pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 12:10am:

Poor Poor Ajax, he cant respond to a simple challenge and find ONE, just ONE predictive model, theory, hypothesis, scrap of data, anything at all that can demonstrate a cooling or static thermal Earth, as CO2 concentration rises in the atmosphere

Poor Poor deranged Craped Crusader - he has to run away and sleep and rest because tomorrow he must post more web videos and putrid stench web sites.

sweet dreams batcrap - dont have any nightmares over this - we wouldnt want your posting rate to suffer tomorrow now would we Ajax

Poor Poor Dr Sircus mentor, the Easterbrook bunny follower and Salby crack pot worshiper.

Denier - you stand condemned for lunacy, deception and self righteous propaganda dissemination.

As well as boring yourself to sleep Ajax you have also managed to bore me to slumber.

Begone with you smelly freak maggot of Hades

My dear red arsed chimp

we

all know the climate models the IPCC use are worthless pieces of junk that haven't been able to forecast ZIP....!!!!!!

We know from the measurements we have taken and compared them to the forecasts of the IPCC models.

What will you do if AGW is mythologizied.

You wouldn't jump of the nearest bridge would you and do us all a favour.

who is we you deranged putrid sonic night mammal?

Have you found any theoretical models that predict cooling or static global temperatures as CO2 rises int he earths atmosphere??

Surely you have some BS web site that can offer one.

Keep looking Batcrap - youre an embarrassment in here posting your right wing fascist corporatism and banking slavery

Begone smelly maggot puppet of the Great Dr Sircus - BEGONE

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #16 - May 27^th, 2015 at 8:31pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 7:30pm:

Ajax wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 6:32pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 12:10am:

Poor Poor Ajax, he cant respond to a simple challenge and find ONE, just ONE predictive model, theory, hypothesis, scrap of data, anything at all that can demonstrate a cooling or static thermal Earth, as CO2 concentration rises in the atmosphere

Poor Poor deranged Craped Crusader - he has to run away and sleep and rest because tomorrow he must post more web videos and putrid stench web sites.

sweet dreams batcrap - dont have any nightmares over this - we wouldnt want your posting rate to suffer tomorrow now would we Ajax

Poor Poor Dr Sircus mentor, the Easterbrook bunny follower and Salby crack pot worshiper.

Denier - you stand condemned for lunacy, deception and self righteous propaganda dissemination.

As well as boring yourself to sleep Ajax you have also managed to bore me to slumber.

Begone with you smelly freak maggot of Hades

My dear red arsed chimp

we

all know the climate models the IPCC use are worthless pieces of junk that haven't been able to forecast ZIP....!!!!!!

We know from the measurements we have taken and compared them to the forecasts of the IPCC models.

What will you do if AGW is mythologizied.

You wouldn't jump of the nearest bridge would you and do us all a favour.

who is we you deranged putrid sonic night mammal?

everyone with a brain, and who pays attention to the scientific method chimp....in other words, everyone but the members of the Church of Climatology.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Rider

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #17 - May 27^th, 2015 at 9:06pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 8:31pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 7:30pm:

Ajax wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 6:32pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 12:10am:

Poor Poor Ajax, he cant respond to a simple challenge and find ONE, just ONE predictive model, theory, hypothesis, scrap of data, anything at all that can demonstrate a cooling or static thermal Earth, as CO2 concentration rises in the atmosphere

Poor Poor deranged Craped Crusader - he has to run away and sleep and rest because tomorrow he must post more web videos and putrid stench web sites.

sweet dreams batcrap - dont have any nightmares over this - we wouldnt want your posting rate to suffer tomorrow now would we Ajax

Poor Poor Dr Sircus mentor, the Easterbrook bunny follower and Salby crack pot worshiper.

Denier - you stand condemned for lunacy, deception and self righteous propaganda dissemination.

As well as boring yourself to sleep Ajax you have also managed to bore me to slumber.

Begone with you smelly freak maggot of Hades

My dear red arsed chimp

we

all know the climate models the IPCC use are worthless pieces of junk that haven't been able to forecast ZIP....!!!!!!

We know from the measurements we have taken and compared them to the forecasts of the IPCC models.

What will you do if AGW is mythologizied.

You wouldn't jump of the nearest bridge would you and do us all a favour.

who is we you deranged putrid sonic night mammal?

everyone with a brain, and who pays attention to the scientific method chimp....in other words, everyone but the members of the Church of Climatology.

Chump is a fraud, just a pathetic disingenuous socialist dressed up in environmentalism drag.

Back to top

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #18 - May 27^th, 2015 at 9:47pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 7:30pm:

Ajax wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 6:32pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 12:10am:

Poor Poor Ajax, he cant respond to a simple challenge and find ONE, just ONE predictive model, theory, hypothesis, scrap of data, anything at all that can demonstrate a cooling or static thermal Earth, as CO2 concentration rises in the atmosphere

Poor Poor deranged Craped Crusader - he has to run away and sleep and rest because tomorrow he must post more web videos and putrid stench web sites.

sweet dreams batcrap - dont have any nightmares over this - we wouldnt want your posting rate to suffer tomorrow now would we Ajax

Poor Poor Dr Sircus mentor, the Easterbrook bunny follower and Salby crack pot worshiper.

Denier - you stand condemned for lunacy, deception and self righteous propaganda dissemination.

As well as boring yourself to sleep Ajax you have also managed to bore me to slumber.

Begone with you smelly freak maggot of Hades

My dear red arsed chimp

we

all know the climate models the IPCC use are worthless pieces of junk that haven't been able to forecast ZIP....!!!!!!

We know from the measurements we have taken and compared them to the forecasts of the IPCC models.

What will you do if AGW is mythologizied.

You wouldn't jump of the nearest bridge would you and do us all a favour.

who is we you deranged putrid sonic night mammal?

Have you found any theoretical models that predict cooling or static global temperatures as CO2 rises int he earths atmosphere??

Surely you have some BS web site that can offer one.

Keep looking Batcrap - youre an embarrassment in here posting your right wing fascist corporatism and banking slavery

Begone smelly maggot puppet of the Great Dr Sircus - BEGONE

https://ch3guest.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/beermonkey.jpg

Hey hairy arse you're in denial, seek out a quack and have a few sessions, it might break those subliminal messages the IPCC have managed to implant in that tiny brain of yours........... Cheesy

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 11070 Australia Gender:	Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data Reply #19 - May 27^th, 2015 at 10:10pm Failed predictions model/human: http://www.c3headlines.com/predictionsforecasts/
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #20 - May 27^th, 2015 at 11:06pm

John_Taverner wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:47pm:

Tell me chimp why would Michael Mann deliberately hide the medieval warm period and the mini ice age...???

In his hockey stick....?????

Especially after Mr. Lamb showed it in the 1990 IPCC report....???

What's the reason.....???

You must be very desperate to go back 25 years to a period (late 1980s) that had very little in the way of data sets.

- but just as a matter of interest, tell me, was the original publication Northern Hemisphere data or global data?

Is your argument based on the premise that the earlier data was more representative than all the later datasets?

Don't feed the troll.

It only attracts other lying trolls like Gizmo.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #21 - May 27^th, 2015 at 11:07pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:06pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:47pm:

Tell me chimp why would Michael Mann deliberately hide the medieval warm period and the mini ice age...???

In his hockey stick....?????

Especially after Mr. Lamb showed it in the 1990 IPCC report....???

What's the reason.....???

You must be very desperate to go back 25 years to a period (late 1980s) that had very little in the way of data sets.

- but just as a matter of interest, tell me, was the original publication Northern Hemisphere data or global data?

Is your argument based on the premise that the earlier data was more representative than all the later datasets?

Don't feed the troll.

It only attracts other lying trolls like Gizmo.

Oh ouch... Grin

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #22 - May 27^th, 2015 at 11:20pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:07pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:06pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:47pm:

Tell me chimp why would Michael Mann deliberately hide the medieval warm period and the mini ice age...???

In his hockey stick....?????

Especially after Mr. Lamb showed it in the 1990 IPCC report....???

What's the reason.....???

You must be very desperate to go back 25 years to a period (late 1980s) that had very little in the way of data sets.

- but just as a matter of interest, tell me, was the original publication Northern Hemisphere data or global data?

Is your argument based on the premise that the earlier data was more representative than all the later datasets?

Don't feed the troll.

It only attracts other lying trolls like Gizmo.

Oh ouch... Grin

Yes Gizmo. We know that you ran away like the weak little piece of crap you are - but the fact remains that you are a liar.

You have been caught red-handed telling lies.

Here is the last example:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1421385253/1134#1134

So - tell use again Gizmo why you wrote:
"global glacial mass balance going up"

That is a complete fabrication
A falsehood
A lie.

You are a liar Gizmo.
You have been caught telling lies.

Any explanation?

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #23 - May 27^th, 2015 at 11:26pm

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:20pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:07pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:06pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:47pm:

Tell me chimp why would Michael Mann deliberately hide the medieval warm period and the mini ice age...???

In his hockey stick....?????

Especially after Mr. Lamb showed it in the 1990 IPCC report....???

What's the reason.....???

You must be very desperate to go back 25 years to a period (late 1980s) that had very little in the way of data sets.

- but just as a matter of interest, tell me, was the original publication Northern Hemisphere data or global data?

Is your argument based on the premise that the earlier data was more representative than all the later datasets?

Don't feed the troll.

It only attracts other lying trolls like Gizmo.

Oh ouch... Grin

Yes Gizmo. We know that you ran away like the weak little piece of crap you are - but the fact remains that you are a liar.

You have been caught red-handed telling lies.

Here is the last example:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1421385253/1134#1134

So - tell use again Gizmo why you wrote:
"global glacial mass balance going up"

That is a complete fabrication
A falsehood
A lie.

You are a liar Gizmo.
You have been caught telling lies.

Any explanation?

Only the truth...which you obviously can't accept.
The Ice Mass is increasing. Antarctica is probably enough to balance out any loss in the Arctic (although the Arctic is also increasing, in reality, just not on warmist paper)

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

rabbitoh08

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #24 - May 27^th, 2015 at 11:32pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:26pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:20pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:07pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:06pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:47pm:

Tell me chimp why would Michael Mann deliberately hide the medieval warm period and the mini ice age...???

In his hockey stick....?????

Especially after Mr. Lamb showed it in the 1990 IPCC report....???

What's the reason.....???

You must be very desperate to go back 25 years to a period (late 1980s) that had very little in the way of data sets.

- but just as a matter of interest, tell me, was the original publication Northern Hemisphere data or global data?

Is your argument based on the premise that the earlier data was more representative than all the later datasets?

Don't feed the troll.

It only attracts other lying trolls like Gizmo.

Oh ouch... Grin

Yes Gizmo. We know that you ran away like the weak little piece of crap you are - but the fact remains that you are a liar.

You have been caught red-handed telling lies.

Here is the last example:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1421385253/1134#1134

So - tell use again Gizmo why you wrote:
"global glacial mass balance going up"

That is a complete fabrication
A falsehood
A lie.

You are a liar Gizmo.
You have been caught telling lies.

Any explanation?

Only the truth...which you obviously can't accept.
The Ice Mass is increasing. Antarctica is probably enough to balance out any loss in the Arctic (although the Arctic is also increasing, in reality, just not on warmist paper)

Still waiting Gizmo.

You told us:
"global glacial mass balance going up"

This is a lie.
I am calling you a liar
You are telling untruths.
You have been caught red-handed telling untruths.

If you wish you say I'm wrong - perhaps you could show some evidence of:
"global glacial mass balance going up"

That would solve all of our problems.

But you can't, can you Gizmo.
You are a liar.
You were caught telling a lie.

Show us some evidence to support your statement Gizmo - or apologise for lying to the forum.

Back to top

IP Logged

Marla Gold Member Offline A joint a day keeps the MAGA away Posts: 15030 Colorado Gender:	Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data Reply #25 - May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:24pm: That's real science. No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science. I'm amazed on how you manage to find so many "credible" scientist in the anti-global warming who are not really scientists at all.
Back to top	I like takin' Tuinal. It keeps me edgy and mean. I'm a teenage schizoid I'm a teenage dope fiend IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #26 - May 28^th, 2015 at 6:25am

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:26pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:20pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:07pm:

rabbitoh08 wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 11:06pm:

John_Taverner wrote on May 27^th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Ajax wrote on May 26^th, 2015 at 9:47pm:

Tell me chimp why would Michael Mann deliberately hide the medieval warm period and the mini ice age...???

In his hockey stick....?????

Especially after Mr. Lamb showed it in the 1990 IPCC report....???

What's the reason.....???

You must be very desperate to go back 25 years to a period (late 1980s) that had very little in the way of data sets.

- but just as a matter of interest, tell me, was the original publication Northern Hemisphere data or global data?

Is your argument based on the premise that the earlier data was more representative than all the later datasets?

Don't feed the troll.

It only attracts other lying trolls like Gizmo.

Oh ouch... Grin

Yes Gizmo. We know that you ran away like the weak little piece of crap you are - but the fact remains that you are a liar.

You have been caught red-handed telling lies.

Here is the last example:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1421385253/1134#1134

So - tell use again Gizmo why you wrote:
"global glacial mass balance going up"

That is a complete fabrication
A falsehood
A lie.

You are a liar Gizmo.
You have been caught telling lies.

Any explanation?

Only the truth...which you obviously can't accept.
The Ice Mass is increasing. Antarctica is probably enough to balance out any loss in the Arctic (although the Arctic is also increasing, in reality, just not on warmist paper)

dimensional analysis- let alone some facts and figures Roll Eyes

- thanks

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data
Reply #27 - May 28^th, 2015 at 9:55am

Well well well well well.........

Guess who's back in town ladies gentlemen

If it isnt the bigoted fascist corpocratic bankster Rider

Rider the stenched up maggot freak puppet all ready for a shoot out at his deranged watering hole.

Yes the selective moral lunacy of the Great Rider freak maggot - Rider wants socialistic welfare for his criminal corporations, banksters and the elite and nobody else. Rider is a socialistic alright - the biggest of them all and he will do anything to protect this elitist scam. You see, Rider is appalled and vomits at the thought of unemployment benefits, free education, health access to all etc, but lays back in his smelly banana chair and nods as the Royal family gouges the public trough of billions of dollars whilst doing nothing to earn it. He watchers fossil fuel companies, banks, elitists and fascist capitalists suckle on the public tax nipple and nods in conformity. The great Rider hypocrite ladies and gentlemen

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 28^th, 2015 at 10:11am by Chimp_Logic »

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic Gold Member Offline πολιτικός Posts: 4826 Mawson Base Gender:	Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data Reply #28 - May 28^th, 2015 at 10:00am Ajax ya smelly sonic freak maggot Have you bothered to look up "greenhouse effect" in the dictionary yet mate? Or are you busy reading the cancer cures of the Great Dr Sircus?? Are you going to post any more of your laughable and fraudulant lists of experts mate? Go on mate - the circus is in town,
Back to top	Mini Ice Age (2014-2029) Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21376 Gender:	Re: IPCC models vs Observed Data Reply #29 - May 28^th, 2015 at 10:55am Marla wrote on May 28^th, 2015 at 5:56am: No question about it. Real Koch Brothers-funded science. Oh, no, The Koch Conspiracy is back.
Back to top	IP Logged