Australian Politics Forum - Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal. Reply #75 - May 24^th, 2015 at 12:07pm Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am: I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. Ahem...might be a good idea for you to edit the above lie.
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39899
Gender: male

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #76 - May 24^th, 2015 at 12:22pm

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:04pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:33am:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am:

I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. In fact, you will find far, far, far more posts there made by me about Cabs than lawyers.

Cods.....for your information.....there is no 'World Court' to which Cowan or the Crown can turn after the High Court. There used to be the Privy Council (London) but appeals to that from Australia were abolished decades ago.

In matters like this,

the High Court is the end of the line.

Further, 'lawyers' is an American term which has made its way here and includes barristers and solicitors.

Where are you Lisa?

Yes my sweet darling.... I'm here.

Was just hanging out a load of washing.

Here's your cuppa and slippers.

Will that be all?

Or would you prefer some discourse on the Australia Act (1986)?

No. Alinta asked, and you have avoided:

Quote:

I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Alinta can ask me again if she wants an answer.

Or does she need you to ask for her?

Why do you need to be asked twice?

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal. Reply #77 - May 24^th, 2015 at 12:23pm Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:07pm: Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am: I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. Ahem...might be a good idea for you to edit the above lie. Ahem!
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Alinta

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #78 - May 24^th, 2015 at 12:32pm

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:22pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:04pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:33am:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am:

I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. In fact, you will find far, far, far more posts there made by me about Cabs than lawyers.

Cods.....for your information.....there is no 'World Court' to which Cowan or the Crown can turn after the High Court. There used to be the Privy Council (London) but appeals to that from Australia were abolished decades ago.

In matters like this,

the High Court is the end of the line.

Further, 'lawyers' is an American term which has made its way here and includes barristers and solicitors.

Where are you Lisa?

Yes my sweet darling.... I'm here.

Was just hanging out a load of washing.

Here's your cuppa and slippers.

Will that be all?

Or would you prefer some discourse on the Australia Act (1986)?

No. Alinta asked, and you have avoided:

Quote:

I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Alinta can ask me again if she wants an answer.

Or does she need you to ask for her?

Why do you need to be asked twice?

The intent of "I'm genuinely interested in hearing......." as per my comment was to elicit your answer, so I'm now asking directly, may I have it?

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #79 - May 24^th, 2015 at 12:48pm

Alinta wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:32pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:22pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:04pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:33am:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am:

I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. In fact, you will find far, far, far more posts there made by me about Cabs than lawyers.

Cods.....for your information.....there is no 'World Court' to which Cowan or the Crown can turn after the High Court. There used to be the Privy Council (London) but appeals to that from Australia were abolished decades ago.

In matters like this,

the High Court is the end of the line.

Further, 'lawyers' is an American term which has made its way here and includes barristers and solicitors.

Where are you Lisa?

Yes my sweet darling.... I'm here.

Was just hanging out a load of washing.

Here's your cuppa and slippers.

Will that be all?

Or would you prefer some discourse on the Australia Act (1986)?

No. Alinta asked, and you have avoided:

Quote:

I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Alinta can ask me again if she wants an answer.

Or does she need you to ask for her?

Why do you need to be asked twice?

The intent of "I'm genuinely interested in hearing......." as per my comment was to elicit your answer, so I'm now asking directly, may I have it?

Oh look ....speak of the devil.

You were here all along...just a nic away in fact. Nothing's changed with you, has it?

You're interested .....supposedly GENUINELY interested even..in my belief/s?

Well here's your answer.

My belief/s has/have S F A to do with the question you've asked me.

One other thing before you log off with that nic.... consider yourself very lucky that I've even acknowledged your dribble this time.

Next time you wish to 'genuinely' ask me a question...use your regular nic.

Have a lovely day. I 'genuinely' mean that.

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Alinta

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #80 - May 24^th, 2015 at 1:01pm

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:48pm:

Alinta wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:32pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:22pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:04pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:33am:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am:

I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. In fact, you will find far, far, far more posts there made by me about Cabs than lawyers.

Cods.....for your information.....there is no 'World Court' to which Cowan or the Crown can turn after the High Court. There used to be the Privy Council (London) but appeals to that from Australia were abolished decades ago.

In matters like this,

the High Court is the end of the line.

Further, 'lawyers' is an American term which has made its way here and includes barristers and solicitors.

Where are you Lisa?

Yes my sweet darling.... I'm here.

Was just hanging out a load of washing.

Here's your cuppa and slippers.

Will that be all?

Or would you prefer some discourse on the Australia Act (1986)?

No. Alinta asked, and you have avoided:

Quote:

I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Alinta can ask me again if she wants an answer.

Or does she need you to ask for her?

Why do you need to be asked twice?

The intent of "I'm genuinely interested in hearing......." as per my comment was to elicit your answer, so I'm now asking directly, may I have it?

Oh look ....speak of the devil.

You were here all along...just a nic away in fact. Nothing's changed with you, has it?

You're interested .....supposedly GENUINELY interested even..in my belief/s?

Well here's your answer.

My belief/s has/have S F A to do with the question you've asked me.

One other thing before you log off with that nic.... consider yourself very lucky that I've even acknowledged your dribble this time.

Next time you wish to 'genuinely' ask me a question...use your regular nic.

Have a lovely day. I 'genuinely' mean that.

Splendid avoidance.......it would seem you know as much about the parole system as you do about my nic.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal. Reply #81 - May 24^th, 2015 at 1:04pm Now..back to the topic.
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #82 - May 24^th, 2015 at 1:15pm

cods wrote on May 23^rd, 2015 at 9:43am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 22^nd, 2015 at 10:10pm:

Aussie wrote on May 22^nd, 2015 at 8:18pm:

skippy. wrote on May 22^nd, 2015 at 8:12pm:

Aussie wrote on May 22^nd, 2015 at 11:04am:

Soooo.....the concept of rehabilitation is just make believe garbage?

No such thing as rehab for pedophiles. They like kids for sex. I doubt I can rehab you to like men for sex? Kiss

I guess that is why we have Parole Boards who evaluate matters like rehabilitation, skippeeee. It is for them to determine, not me....or you.

Wrong...yet again.

aussie agrees its their right to have this tax funded..

what about the victims family.. what rights do they have???

do they have the right to claim his sentence isnt long enough???? can they go to the HIGH COURT and demand a longer sentence..???????

NO THEY CANT...

it is up to the DPP to do that... if they decide its ok then nothing the family can do about it...

yet these monsters can go on and on .. like Ivan Milat...get all the attention they dont deserve..

It really matters not what Aussie thinks.

He is a qualified Googler. That is all.

It matters not what anyone says or thinks at this stage of the criminal legal process....except for 2 people.

And these 2 people will make sure this multi child rapist and pedophile stays in jail for a non parole period of 20 yrs.

Now...I've left enough clues in this post for wannabe lawyer Aussie and the 'Alinta' id to get googling.

Lovely day out there.

Bbq time here with the family.

Bye.

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Aussie2 Junior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 91 Teepee Gender:	Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal. Reply #83 - May 24^th, 2015 at 1:16pm Doing the best I can to follow this, the Topic has arrived at this point. "Lisa, I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom."
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39899
Gender: male

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #84 - May 24^th, 2015 at 3:23pm

I posted:

Quote:

No.....it is Parole Boards who consider matters of rehabilitation.

Response:

Quote:

Is it?

You sure about that?

I posted:

Quote:

I guess that is why we have Parole Boards who evaluate matters like rehabilitation, skippeeee. It is for them to determine, not me....or you.

Response:

Quote:

Wrong...yet again.

Lisa posted (as above):

Quote:

You sure about that?

Alinta:

Quote:

I am.

The Judge sets a non parole period taking into account prospects of rehabilitation, antecedents, etc (refer to Penalties & Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) that cover the etc).

Following expiry of the non parole period and a parole application is made, the Parole Board assesses whether or not the prisoner has fulfilled rehabilitation and any other relevant matters and hands down its decision to grant or refuse parole. Such assessment can be far reaching with much additional information sought for consideration prior to making the decision.

You beg to differ?????

Lisa:

Quote:

Yep....actually I do.

Why?

You see, unlike you and Aussie, I don't need to google my way around this area and produce out of context slabs of info.

I actually KNOW the legal processes involved....because I've gone to uni and studied law. Both you and Aussie have not. And it's bloody obvious.

Pretty clear. Lisa claims she knows the processes because

she studied Law at University.

Alinta ~ politely:

Quote:

FYI Lisa, only googled the Qld Sentencing Act to clarify its similarity with the comparable Act in my home state of Victoria.

I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

I make several posts attempting to get Lisa to respond and then, almost 24 hours after Alinta’s polite enquiry, I posted:

Quote:

Where are you Lisa?

17 minutes later, Lisa replied with:
Quote:

Yes my sweet darling.... I'm here.

Was just hanging out a load of washing.

Here's your cuppa and slippers.

Will that be all?

Or would you prefer some discourse on the Australia Act (1986)?

I reply:

Quote:

No. Alinta asked, and you have avoided:

“I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom. “

Lisa:

Quote:

Alinta can ask me again if she wants an answer.

Or does she need you to ask for her?

Me:

Quote:

Why do you need to be asked twice?

Alinta, again, politely:

Quote:

The intent of "I'm genuinely interested in hearing......." as per my comment was to elicit your answer, so I'm now asking directly, may I have it?

Lisa:

Quote:

Oh look ....speak of the devil.

You were here all along...just a nic away in fact. Nothing's changed with you, has it?

You're interested .....supposedly GENUINELY interested even..in my belief/s?

Well here's your answer.

My belief/s has/have S F A to do with the question you've asked me.

One other thing before you log off with that nic.... consider yourself very lucky that I've even acknowledged your dribble this time.

Next time you wish to 'genuinely' ask me a question...use your regular nic.

Have a lovely day. I 'genuinely' mean that.

Alinta:

Quote:

Splendid avoidance.......it would seem you know as much about the parole system as you do about my nic.

Lisa:

Quote:

Now..back to the topic.

Lisa:

Quote:

It really matters not what Aussie thinks.

He is a qualified Googler. That is all.

It matters not what anyone says or thinks at this stage of the criminal legal process....except for 2 people.

And these 2 people will make sure this multi child rapist and pedophile stays in jail for a non parole period of 20 yrs.

Now...I've left enough clues in this post for wannabe lawyer Aussie and the 'Alinta' id to get googling.

Lovely day out there.

Bbq time here with the family.

Bye.

Oliver Klozoff:

Quote:

Doing the best I can to follow this, the Topic has arrived at this
point. "Lisa, I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom."

And………then we have deathly silence from Lisa, she who has studied Law at University .

Lisa, just answer the very simple question posed as an obvious consequence of your own words ~ the question being:

How do you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal. Reply #85 - May 24^th, 2015 at 6:44pm In short, you STILL haven't any idea about this criminal legal process despite being spoon fed by me. Good. Thank you for confirming that you are a fraud.
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39899
Gender: male

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #86 - May 24^th, 2015 at 6:50pm

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 6:44pm:

In short, you STILL haven't any idea about this criminal legal process despite being spoon fed by me.

Good.

Thank you for confirming that you are a fraud.

Yes, yes, yes Lisa. Awesome and ...... hmmmm....interesting.

Now back on topic.

Quote:

How do you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #87 - May 24^th, 2015 at 7:10pm

[quote author=Aussie link=1432186556/71#71 date=1432430189]I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. In fact, you will find far, far, far more posts there made by me about Cabs than lawyers.

NOT WHAT I HAVE BEEN TOLD...

Cods.....for your information.....there is no 'World Court' to which Cowan or the Crown can turn after the High Court. There used to be the Privy Council (London) but appeals to that from Australia were abolished decades ago.

In matters like this,

the High Court is the end of the line.

there is so a world court just google it.. and if this bastard hears about it he would use it...he is the scum of the earth.

Further, 'lawyers' is an American term which has made its way here and includes barristers and solicitors.

Where are you Lisa?[/quote]

we are not IN AMERICA....here a solicitor is NOT a Lawyer..

unless of course you got you degree from America in 7 days... Grin

hey and how about lobbying your girlfriend on her own post... you are bound to get a reaction that way

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36499
Gender: female

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #88 - May 24^th, 2015 at 7:16pm

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:48pm:

Alinta wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:32pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:22pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:04pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 12:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:33am:

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2015 at 11:16am:

I never blew my trumpet at PA about my background whatsoever. In fact, you will find far, far, far more posts there made by me about Cabs than lawyers.

Cods.....for your information.....there is no 'World Court' to which Cowan or the Crown can turn after the High Court. There used to be the Privy Council (London) but appeals to that from Australia were abolished decades ago.

In matters like this,

the High Court is the end of the line.

Further, 'lawyers' is an American term which has made its way here and includes barristers and solicitors.

Where are you Lisa?

Yes my sweet darling.... I'm here.

Was just hanging out a load of washing.

Here's your cuppa and slippers.

Will that be all?

Or would you prefer some discourse on the Australia Act (1986)?

No. Alinta asked, and you have avoided:

Quote:

I'm not interested in either slinging insults, or discussing my credentials here, however I am genuinely interested in hearing how you believe the matter of rehabilitation is addressed and by whom.

Alinta can ask me again if she wants an answer.

Or does she need you to ask for her?

Why do you need to be asked twice?

The intent of "I'm genuinely interested in hearing......." as per my comment was to elicit your answer, so I'm now asking directly, may I have it?

Oh look ....speak of the devil.

You were here all along...just a nic away in fact. Nothing's changed with you, has it?

You're interested .....supposedly GENUINELY interested even..in my belief/s?

Well here's your answer.

My belief/s has/have S F A to do with the question you've asked me.

One other thing before you log off with that nic.... consider yourself very lucky that I've even acknowledged your dribble this time.

Next time you wish to 'genuinely' ask me a question...use your regular nic.

Have a lovely day. I 'genuinely' mean that.

Why do you always do this Lisa?

You know as well as i do the Alinta was never anything close to a troll. She was one of the most respected ID's on Yahoo because when she DID venture to speak, what she said was always very measured and reasonable.

Her knowledge of the legal world is actually very good. And her research skills are excellent. I would place strong consideration on anything she said on the topic.

Your habit of calling anyone a 'multu ID troll' who asks you to qualify yourself for your eternal claims of superior knowledge is tiresome Lisa. It's just tiresome.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Cowan/Morcombe Appeal.
Reply #89 - May 24^th, 2015 at 7:19pm

lisa please answer aussie and now alinta... as the posts are getting massively long and it wont be long at this rate it will be 1 to a page....

aussie has a habit of reissuing every line over and over...

someone make lisa answer a reasonable question...

if she doesnt then she should be banned from said thread for making outlandish comments... and telling others they dont know nuffink...

dont you get fed up with people when they are backed into a corner.. they ping off... or change the topic... Roll Eyes

come on lisa tell the world what your Uni Law Professor taught you about rehabilitation.?????

we are busting to know..

Back to top

IP Logged