Aussie wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 6:55pm:



having dementia doesnt quite give the victims the justice they seek... thats the trouble...you say a time limit on people coming forward...yet you have no problems with pointing the finger at police when it comes to the Bali 9...no matter how long ago..

you think the parents of a young boy who disappeared for 8 years before his murderer was finally brought to justice should shut up and go away...

yet you would advocate Australia severing all ties with a country that carries out its very well known Laws...

I find that extraordinary. and not very consistent for someone who claims to be an ex solicitor.

cods wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 7:34pm:


If I said any of those things, I'd understand you, but.....guess what......I did not.

That, cods, is a classic strawman.  You do know what that is, yeas?

Aussie wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 7:40pm:



yes you did.. not in those words maybe.. but thats what it looked like..

so dont go patting yourself on the back...

a lot of people see right through you aussie..

always in denial...

straw man  someone who believes he and only he is always right..I wonder who that reminds me of..

you said terrible things about the Morecombs and now the Indonesian Govt...

what denial do you have for that?

Organisations including the Leicestershire Police, the CPS, the Home Office and the care home where Lord Janner is accused of abusing victims in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980, will all come under scrutiny during the process.

Allegations that senior officials also helped to cover up his abuse will also be examined.

The announcement comes after Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, was heavily criticised for deciding not to prosecute Lord Janner, even though there is sufficient evidence to merit a court case.

She has been asked to hand over all documents and evidence to the independent inquiry.

Earlier today, a law firm representing alleged victims became the second to write to Ms Saunders in an attempt overturn her decision.

Peter Garsden, whose firm is representing three clients in a civil child abuse claim against Lord Janner, has said he wants Ms Saunders to disclose the various reports which supported her conclusion.

Mr Garsden said his clients were "outraged", and said they are considering a judicial review into the matter.

Liz Dux, a specialist abuse lawyer at Slater and Gordon, said her firm had also contacted the DPP to formally request a review of the decision.

Ms Dux said all her clients want is ”the opportunity to give their evidence and to be heard“.

Lord Janner denies the allegations against him. His family have said he is "entirely innocent of any wrongdoing".

Justice Lowell Goddard, the head of the inquiry examining allegations of a paedophile ring operating in Westminster in the 1980s, is to investigate whether child sexual abuse allegations against Lord Greville Janner were the subject of an establishment cover-up.

Justice Goddard said "public concern" surrounding allegations that Lord Janner sexually abused vulnerable children who were resident in Leicestershire care homes in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, requires a "thorough and wholly independent investigation".

The move follows the seeking of a formal review by the alleged victims to revisit the Crown Prosecution's (CPS) decision not to prosecute the Labour MP on grounds of poor health.

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said earlier this month that Lord Janner should not be prosecuted because the severity of his dementia means he is unfit to stand trial.

Justice Goddard said: "The depth of public concern surrounding the Janner case exemplifies the need for a thorough and wholly independent investigation into the adequacy of institutional responses to child sexual abuse, particularly where persons in positions of influence are alleged to have abused children in institutional settings and have, for one reason or another, escaped prosecution over a number of years.

"It would of course be quite wrong to pre-judge the outcome of our inquiries in any way, but there is, in my view, a clear public interest in conducting an exhaustive and critical examination of the institutional decision-making processes in this case and in exposing them to public scrutiny."

On Twitter this morning, we decided to challenge the CPS, and researched our own database where offenders with dementia have been taken to court – Remarkable response with many journalists already sharing our findings
Here is a number of cases where other paedophiles with dementia have been found GUILTY in court
72-year-old Dementia sufferer is jailed for “appalling” child sex offences committed 40 years ago http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/20…/…/07/brian-ash-millendreath/
Paedophile suffered from dementia & Alzheimer’s disease at TIME of offences – Guilty http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/…/03/12/douglas-turner-barnsta…/
Paedophile with severe dementia found guilty of abusing 6 under-age girls in a trial held in his absence http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/…/michael-collingwood-tedburn-…/
Paedophile with dementia was remanded in custody – Found guilty at trial & then jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-3UV
Eastham paedophile had vascular problems and resulting dementia – Found guilty in court http://wp.me/p2gE9F-41C
Paedophile suffers from dementia & heart problems – Found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-6We
Judge convicts paedophile with korsakoff’s syndrome, a form of dementia. http://wp.me/p2gE9F-71N
Paedophile with dementia walks free from court after abusing girls as young as two http://wp.me/p2gE9F-8Kv
Suffers from dementia,mentally incapable of standing trial – Not be able to understand proceedings – Found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-aiE
82-year-old Belfast pensioner with dementia found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-fn5
Wick/Bristol paedophile Teacher recently assessed for dementia found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-g3j
78-year-old Cornton paedophile who has dementia & is nearly deaf found guilty and jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hgl
Harworth paedophile with vascular dementia found Guilty – However walked free from court http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hhU
Chippenham/London paedophile Teacher molested children – suffered from dementia – Found guilty & jailed for 7 years http://wp.me/p2gE9F-huk
Stoke paedophile with fronto-temporal dementia – Found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hz9
Stanmore paedophile suffered from dementia & Alzheimer’s – Found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-iI2
Swindon paedophile systematically sexually abused a young girl in the 1970s – Had dementia & found Guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-iOG
Huddersfield paedophile unfit to plead to charges against him cause of dementia BUT was tried & found guilty by jury http://wp.me/p2gE9F-jhB
Paedophile who abused two boys over 30 years ago detained indefinitely under hospital order – Had dementia – GUILTY http://wp.me/p2gE9F-gf8
Janner not too ill to claim expenses
Westminster attendance records show Janner attended the House of Lords almost daily and claimed more than £100,000 in expenses in the four years after he was diagnosed with the disease.
He only stopped attending Parliament – and claiming up to £300 a day for doing so – when child abuse police raided his house on December 2013. Even in that month he attended the Lords 12 times.
Analysis of records shows Janner continued speaking fluently for years after his diagnosis and was also alert enough to claim expenses among the highest in the Lords.
In the 12 months up to April 2009, the year of his diagnosis, he attended the Lords 143 times – only just shy of the 147 maximum possible. And he managed to fill in forms procuring himself £12,075 in subsistence payments and £13,468 in ‘office costs’ – with another £691 in mileage claims for his car.
In the following year, up to April 2010, he attended 136 days at the Lords out of a maximum 142 and claimed £10,986 subsistence, £11,625 office costs and £589 mileage.
In the year to April 2011 he turned up 126 days out of 137, and claimed expenses totalling £34,014. In the year to April 2012, Janner attended 143 days out of a maximum of 156. He also managed to claim a hefty £28,800 in expenses.
In the following year, up to April 2013, he turned up 136 days out of 144, and claimed expenses totalling £24,600.
In April, May and June 2013 he attended every one of the 30 days the Lords sat, claiming a total of £6,450 in expenses. In July he was absent just one out of 20 days, claiming £2,850 for the remaining 19.
And in August, September, October and November, he did not miss a single sitting out of 32 days, and claimed £4,800 in expenses.
Janner’s history and the child sex abuse case he avoided