Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 ... 33
Send Topic Print
Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS (Read 30442 times)
John_Taverner
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2217
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #195 - May 8th, 2015 at 7:03am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:04am:
Since the Co2 levels were above 400 ppm 100,000 years, without human industry or action (and during a Glaciation) why are you so sure that 400 ppm of Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry??


Your premise is wrong. Anyone who accepted this without any challenge needs to brush up on the facts too.
Back to top
 
72+Adelaide+Street  
IP Logged
 
John_Taverner
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2217
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #196 - May 8th, 2015 at 7:07am
 
Bobby. wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 11:21pm:
Dear beloved Chimp,
you have taken this thread off course with wild speculation.

CO2 may very well have almost no affect on temperature.

Ever notice how cold it is when there are no clouds at night?
It's the water vapor that keeps the heat in - not CO2.

forgiven

namaste


You're the ice age bozo. I won't waste too much time on you, but you seriously need to go back to school.
Back to top
 
72+Adelaide+Street  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 121247
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #197 - May 8th, 2015 at 7:16am
 
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:07am:
Bobby. wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 11:21pm:
Dear beloved Chimp,
you have taken this thread off course with wild speculation.

CO2 may very well have almost no affect on temperature.

Ever notice how cold it is when there are no clouds at night?
It's the water vapor that keeps the heat in - not CO2.

forgiven

namaste


You're the ice age bozo. I won't waste too much time on you, but you seriously need to go back to school.



I merely ask you to consider all the evidence.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 62077
Here
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #198 - May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:37am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:04am:
Since the Co2 levels were above 400 ppm 100,000 years, without human industry or action (and during a Glaciation) why are you so sure that 400 ppm of Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry??


Correlation  Wink Wink


Correct, every time in the past that one of the greenhouse gasses were measured to be high the event correlated to a warm period.

Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry?


CO2 levels were fairly constant for many centuries, From the industrial revolution till today we have been pumping billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.

Do you really think that increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere coinciding with us pumping billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere is just a crazy coincidence.

Conclusion is that we know that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will cause temperature increases as it has every other time in the past  and we know that CO2 levels are increasing in the atmosphere and have been ever since we started pumping more and more CO2 into the atmosphere (hardly a surprise finding).

People arguing that pumping more of something in will not increase the volume are literally arguing that 2 + 2 = 2.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John_Taverner
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2217
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #199 - May 8th, 2015 at 8:46am
 
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am:
Conclusion is that we know that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will cause temperature increases as it has every other time in the past  and we know that CO2 levels are increasing in the atmosphere and have been ever since we started pumping more and more CO2 into the atmosphere (hardly a surprise finding).

People arguing that pumping more of something in will not increase the volume are literally arguing that 2 + 2 = 2.


This is true, but apart from that, the fact that Carbon Dioxide absorbs Infrared radiation of the right wavelength (and scatters it) is about as well established as you can get.  It's even a well established way of measuring CO2 levels.

http://www.systechillinois.com/en/infrared-carbon-dioxide-sensors_48.html

Quote:
Systech Illinois’ carbon dioxide analyzers use the well-defined infrared principle for accurate measurement of percent levels of carbon dioxide in most industrial processes.

The infrared sensors are in a self contained unit mounted inside the carbon dioxide gas analyzers with the necessary electronics to process the signal from the sensor and display the carbon dioxide concentration on the digital display.


There is no need for second guessing or relying on past data.
Back to top
 
72+Adelaide+Street  
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #200 - May 8th, 2015 at 9:10am
 
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 8:46am:
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am:
Conclusion is that we know that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will cause temperature increases as it has every other time in the past  and we know that CO2 levels are increasing in the atmosphere and have been ever since we started pumping more and more CO2 into the atmosphere (hardly a surprise finding).

People arguing that pumping more of something in will not increase the volume are literally arguing that 2 + 2 = 2.


This is true, but apart from that, the fact that Carbon Dioxide absorbs Infrared radiation of the right wavelength (and scatters it) is about as well established as you can get.  It's even a well established way of measuring CO2 levels.

http://www.systechillinois.com/en/infrared-carbon-dioxide-sensors_48.html

Quote:
Systech Illinois’ carbon dioxide analyzers use the well-defined infrared principle for accurate measurement of percent levels of carbon dioxide in most industrial processes.

The infrared sensors are in a self contained unit mounted inside the carbon dioxide gas analyzers with the necessary electronics to process the signal from the sensor and display the carbon dioxide concentration on the digital display.


There is no need for second guessing or relying on past data.

So is a wavelength saturation, but what the activist climate junky relies on, are the unknowns. They rely on feedbacks. Co2 alone is not an issue.

So no, the way you talk of confidence is utter crap.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 62077
Here
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #201 - May 8th, 2015 at 9:51am
 
progressiveslol wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 9:10am:
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 8:46am:
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am:
Conclusion is that we know that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will cause temperature increases as it has every other time in the past  and we know that CO2 levels are increasing in the atmosphere and have been ever since we started pumping more and more CO2 into the atmosphere (hardly a surprise finding).

People arguing that pumping more of something in will not increase the volume are literally arguing that 2 + 2 = 2.


This is true, but apart from that, the fact that Carbon Dioxide absorbs Infrared radiation of the right wavelength (and scatters it) is about as well established as you can get.  It's even a well established way of measuring CO2 levels.

http://www.systechillinois.com/en/infrared-carbon-dioxide-sensors_48.html

Quote:
Systech Illinois’ carbon dioxide analyzers use the well-defined infrared principle for accurate measurement of percent levels of carbon dioxide in most industrial processes.

The infrared sensors are in a self contained unit mounted inside the carbon dioxide gas analyzers with the necessary electronics to process the signal from the sensor and display the carbon dioxide concentration on the digital display.


There is no need for second guessing or relying on past data.

So is a wavelength saturation, but what the activist climate junky relies on, are the unknowns. They rely on feedbacks. Co2 alone is not an issue.

So no, the way you talk of confidence is utter crap.


The unknowns are getting less and less, the facts would indicate that it is the other side reliant on obfuscation and shaky cherry picked data.

Co2 alone is not an issue.

Welcome back from your 20 year stay on Mars, you have some catching up to do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #202 - May 8th, 2015 at 11:32am
 
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 9:51am:
progressiveslol wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 9:10am:
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 8:46am:
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am:
Conclusion is that we know that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will cause temperature increases as it has every other time in the past  and we know that CO2 levels are increasing in the atmosphere and have been ever since we started pumping more and more CO2 into the atmosphere (hardly a surprise finding).

People arguing that pumping more of something in will not increase the volume are literally arguing that 2 + 2 = 2.


This is true, but apart from that, the fact that Carbon Dioxide absorbs Infrared radiation of the right wavelength (and scatters it) is about as well established as you can get.  It's even a well established way of measuring CO2 levels.

http://www.systechillinois.com/en/infrared-carbon-dioxide-sensors_48.html

Quote:
Systech Illinois’ carbon dioxide analyzers use the well-defined infrared principle for accurate measurement of percent levels of carbon dioxide in most industrial processes.

The infrared sensors are in a self contained unit mounted inside the carbon dioxide gas analyzers with the necessary electronics to process the signal from the sensor and display the carbon dioxide concentration on the digital display.


There is no need for second guessing or relying on past data.

So is a wavelength saturation, but what the activist climate junky relies on, are the unknowns. They rely on feedbacks. Co2 alone is not an issue.

So no, the way you talk of confidence is utter crap.


The unknowns are getting less and less, the facts would indicate that it is the other side reliant on obfuscation and shaky cherry picked data.

Co2 alone is not an issue.

Welcome back from your 20 year stay on Mars, you have some catching up to do.

I think you are getting mixed up with a planet not having an atmosphere similar to earth.

Sure, put a plastic bag over your head without resupply of oxygen and you would be right, although right for what argument, only you know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #203 - May 8th, 2015 at 11:32am
 
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 9:51am:
progressiveslol wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 9:10am:
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 8:46am:
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am:
Conclusion is that we know that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will cause temperature increases as it has every other time in the past  and we know that CO2 levels are increasing in the atmosphere and have been ever since we started pumping more and more CO2 into the atmosphere (hardly a surprise finding).

People arguing that pumping more of something in will not increase the volume are literally arguing that 2 + 2 = 2.


This is true, but apart from that, the fact that Carbon Dioxide absorbs Infrared radiation of the right wavelength (and scatters it) is about as well established as you can get.  It's even a well established way of measuring CO2 levels.

http://www.systechillinois.com/en/infrared-carbon-dioxide-sensors_48.html

Quote:
Systech Illinois’ carbon dioxide analyzers use the well-defined infrared principle for accurate measurement of percent levels of carbon dioxide in most industrial processes.

The infrared sensors are in a self contained unit mounted inside the carbon dioxide gas analyzers with the necessary electronics to process the signal from the sensor and display the carbon dioxide concentration on the digital display.


There is no need for second guessing or relying on past data.

So is a wavelength saturation, but what the activist climate junky relies on, are the unknowns. They rely on feedbacks. Co2 alone is not an issue.

So no, the way you talk of confidence is utter crap.


The unknowns are getting less and less, the facts would indicate that it is the other side reliant on obfuscation and shaky cherry picked data.

Co2 alone is not an issue.

Welcome back from your 20 year stay on Mars, you have some catching up to do.

CO2 alone is an issue: the others just make it worse.
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #204 - May 8th, 2015 at 11:58am
 
Bobby. wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 11:21pm:
Dear beloved Chimp,
you have taken this thread off course with wild speculation.

CO2 may very well have almost no affect on temperature.

Ever notice how cold it is when there are no clouds at night?
It's the water vapor that keeps the heat in - not CO2.

forgiven

namaste


Water Vapor is the greenhouse effect: CO2 is a major GHG that drives it!

Solubility in water decreases with increasing temperature so when the planets pull the earth into a warm orbit CO2 outgasses and drives more water vapour into the air sustaining an enhanced greenhouse effect in a what's known as a positive feedback loop.

When the planets pull the earth back into a cold orbit the CO2 returns to the ocean because solubility in water has increased with the decreasing temperature and another positive feedback loop in the oppositie direction results in a sustained and decreasing greehouse effect.

Shall we do another billion word circle jerk?? (You really haven't done much reading yourself have ya buddy  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy ..or are you just pretending and playing pause button politics so industry can retool for the new paradigm  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Shocked  Shocked)

It's called a complex relationship but you know all that and pretend you don't because you hate the kids that much  Cheesy
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #205 - May 8th, 2015 at 12:56pm
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 11:58am:
Bobby. wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 11:21pm:
Dear beloved Chimp,
you have taken this thread off course with wild speculation.

CO2 may very well have almost no affect on temperature.

Ever notice how cold it is when there are no clouds at night?
It's the water vapor that keeps the heat in - not CO2.

forgiven

namaste


Water Vapor is the greenhouse effect:
CO2 is a major GHG that drives it!


Solubility in water decreases with increasing temperature so when the planets pull the earth into a warm orbit CO2 outgasses and drives more water vapour into the air sustaining an enhanced greenhouse effect in a what's known as a positive feedback loop.

When the planets pull the earth back into a cold orbit the CO2 returns to the ocean because solubility in water has increased with the decreasing temperature and another positive feedback loop in the oppositie direction results in a sustained and decreasing greehouse effect.

Shall we do another billion word circle jerk?? (You really haven't done much reading yourself have ya buddy  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy ..or are you just pretending and playing pause button politics so industry can retool for the new paradigm  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Shocked  Shocked)

It's called a complex relationship but you know all that and pretend you don't because you hate the kids that much  Cheesy

NO. You are doing the IM CONFIDENT of the unknowns. No sorry, you don't know at all.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #206 - May 8th, 2015 at 1:01pm
 
Bobby. wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:16am:
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:07am:
Bobby. wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 11:21pm:
Dear beloved Chimp,
you have taken this thread off course with wild speculation.

CO2 may very well have almost no affect on temperature.

Ever notice how cold it is when there are no clouds at night?
It's the water vapor that keeps the heat in - not CO2.

forgiven

namaste


You're the ice age bozo. I won't waste too much time on you, but you seriously need to go back to school.



I merely ask you to consider all the evidence.


Did you examine ALL the evidence on whether smoking tobacco causes illnesses in Humans such as cancer before you arrived at your wise opinions.

There was lots of EVIDENCE which disputed the link between smoking tabacco and detrimental health effects.

Were you skeptical Jethro?

Did you watch a lot of Videos from You Tube?

Did you pay close attention to the spin doctors paid by the tobacco corporations?


Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #207 - May 8th, 2015 at 1:56pm
 
John_Taverner wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:03am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:04am:
Since the Co2 levels were above 400 ppm 100,000 years, without human industry or action (and during a Glaciation) why are you so sure that 400 ppm of Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry??


Your premise is wrong. Anyone who accepted this without any challenge needs to brush up on the facts too.


How is the premise wrong...IF Co2 levels were at or over 400 ppm during a Glacial event, then the Co2 levels we currently have are not causing warming.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #208 - May 8th, 2015 at 2:28pm
 
Dnarever wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 7:21am:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:37am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:04am:
Since the Co2 levels were above 400 ppm 100,000 years, without human industry or action (and during a Glaciation) why are you so sure that 400 ppm of Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry??


Correlation  Wink Wink


Correct, every time in the past that one of the greenhouse gasses were measured to be high the event correlated to a warm period.

Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry?


CO2 levels were fairly constant for many centuries, From the industrial revolution till today we have been pumping billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.

Do you really think that increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere coinciding with us pumping billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere is just a crazy coincidence.



C-14 is produced from C-12 in the biosphere by cosmic radiation. Fossil fuels have been buried shielded from cosmic radiation long enough to have all their C-14 decayed to C-12

if you look at a graph of change in C-14 over time, you will see that there is a decrease in the fraction of C-14 (relative to C-12) and this means that much of the CO2 added to the earths atmosphere is made up of Carbon which is depleted of the C-14 isotope

So, this is very strong evidence that the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is due to the combustion of fossil fuels.

This coincidence that you speak of, has left a very distinct isotopic marker which can be measured

there is no doubt that the increase in atmospheric CO2 levels are human generated (fossil fuel combustion and deforestation)

(in any case, a simple mass balance will tell you how much CO2 has been produced by human activities over the past century or so, and this CO2 has gone somewhere hasnt it folks)

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 8th, 2015 at 2:41pm by Chimp_Logic »  

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #209 - May 8th, 2015 at 2:46pm
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:37am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 8th, 2015 at 12:04am:
rabbitoh08 wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 11:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 10:51pm:
rabbitoh08 wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 10:48pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 10:42pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 10:19pm:
Soren wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 9:01pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on May 7th, 2015 at 7:31pm:
the CO2 concentration in the earths atmosphere has breached the 400 ppmv level




Oooh... it has breached the 0.04% mark!!!!!

Plant food has breached the 0.04% mark!! Run for the hills!!!!



when did the atmospheric CO2 concentration last breach the 400 ppmv level?


Anytime before about 100,000 years ago.

Exactly.

And how many permanent human settlements existed before   100,000 years ago?


Almost none from what I've read/studied. They were mostly hunter/gatherers at that stage.

Very good!

So - can you now explain to us why you think your question was relevant?

We are talking about something happening now - that is impacting significantly on permanent human habitations and their associated infrastructure.

Why is what may or may not have happened 100,000 years ago relevant?


Since the Co2 levels were above 400 ppm 100,000 years, without human industry or action (and during a Glaciation) why are you so sure that 400 ppm of Co2 has anything to do with the recent warming or was even mostly caused by human industry??


Correlation  Wink Wink


Yes, correlation, as opposed to causation...
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 ... 33
Send Topic Print