Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road (Read 1927 times)
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Mar 20th, 2015 at 3:46pm
 
East West Link: Tony Abbott concedes defeat on Melbourne road

    AAP
    March 20, 2015
    The Australian

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has admitted defeat in his bid to have the East West Link road tunnel built.   Smiley

MELBOURNE’s East West Link road tunnel won’t be built, but something has to replace it, Prime Minister Tony Abbott says.

Mr Abbott has finally conceded defeat in his attempts to get the Victorian government to build the $6.8 billion stage one of the East West Link.

Premier Daniel Andrews promised to dump the controversial project if he won last year’s election.   Smiley

Mr Abbott has repeatedly urged him to build the road anyway, but finally acknowledged that race was run.

“If East West Link is off the table as far as the Victorian government is concerned. Let’s see what else might be possible that will address these major bottlenecks and which will be worthy recipients of major commonwealth government funding,” Mr Abbott told ABC radio on Friday.

The prime minister identified the West Gate Bridge in Melbourne’s west and the Hoddle St intersection in Melbourne’s east as the city’s two major traffic bottlenecks.

“What I’m intending to do is keep talking to the premier about what we can do. Not East West Link because he doesn’t want to build East West Link,” he said.

“But what I’m going to do is keep talking to him about other ways of addressing these major traffic choke points.” The federal government had given Victoria $1.5 billion for the road’s eastern stage one, and $1.5 billion for stage two, due to be built in Melbourne’s west.

Mr Andrews has argued for that money to go towards removing suburban level crossings, but Mr Abbott has said commonwealth money must go to projects of national economic significance. AAP
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #1 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 3:51pm
 
Mr Abbott, Premier Andrews took this issue to an election and won.  The good people of Victoria want the money spent, on the removal of 50 dangerous level crossings.      Sad
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FD
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100400
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #2 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 5:43pm
 
Yes, but Mr Abbott wants to be our Roads and Infrastructure Prime Minister, so something needs to be done.

Can’t they fix a few potholes or something?

It’s so unfair. These leftards would do anything to make Mr Abbott look bad.

Maybe Mr Abbott can fix KRudd’s school halls.

SHAME LABOR SHAME
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28141
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #3 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:18pm
 
The funds allocated for the cancelled project are Commonwealth funds and Abbott is right - they should be spent on things that are of national significance.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39641
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #4 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:22pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:18pm:
The funds allocated for the cancelled project are Commonwealth funds and Abbott is right - they should be spent on things that are of national significance.


I don't give a stuff about some road in Victoria.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #5 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 11:20pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:18pm:
The funds allocated for the cancelled project are Commonwealth funds and Abbott is right - they should be spent on things that are of national significance.

The funds were originally allocated to a different project before it was redirected in Abbott's jihad against public transport projects. It would be sensible to restore that funding for the project it was originally tied to. Of course, we know the Abbott government aren't sensible in their approach to policy. They're more indecisive than Imelda Marcos trying to decide which shoes to wear.

"National significance" is just code for what the Liberals want to fund. There's no actual requirement anywhere that must be met.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
FD
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100400
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #6 - Mar 20th, 2015 at 11:47pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:18pm:
The funds allocated for the cancelled project are Commonwealth funds and Abbott is right - they should be spent on things that are of national significance.


I agree. The dog on the tuckerbox could do with a bit of a touch up. Is that in Victoria?

The leftards did neglect it so.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #7 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 12:10pm
 
We have all these Ministers both State and Federal traveling all over the world looking at public transport and road infrastructure for what....Most reports have found that having a good public transport system reduces congestion on the roads yet pubic transport is being neglected in the debate....More cars means more car parks which are never adequate and to expensive....Toll roads will become the norm and far more expensive than public transport for commuters....We need a mature debate about infrastructure that includes public transport instead of an ideological opposition that ignores the evidence!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #8 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 12:20pm
 
Quote:
Mr Abbott, Premier Andrews took this issue to an election and won.  The good people of Victoria want the money spent, on the removal of 50 dangerous level crossings.      Sad


and abbott took the removal of the carbon tax to an election and you opposed its removal.  Cant you find a consistent position on anything?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #9 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 12:37pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 21st, 2015 at 12:10pm:
We have all these Ministers both State and Federal traveling all over the world looking at public transport and road infrastructure for what....Most reports have found that having a good public transport system reduces congestion on the roads yet pubic transport is being neglected in the debate....More cars means more car parks which are never adequate and to expensive....Toll roads will become the norm and far more expensive than public transport for commuters....We need a mature debate about infrastructure that includes public transport instead of an ideological opposition that ignores the evidence!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The length of journey times by car or public transport tend to become equal. If cars are quicker, more people would use them. This can increase congestion to the point where cars are no longer quicker. This has been observed to happen in cities all over the world.

It's why we need to invest in all modes of transport. Not road alone, not public transport alone, but both.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #10 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 4:51pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2015 at 12:20pm:
Quote:
Mr Abbott, Premier Andrews took this issue to an election and won.  The good people of Victoria want the money spent, on the removal of 50 dangerous level crossings.      Sad


and abbott took the removal of the carbon tax to an election and you opposed its removal.  Cant you find a consistent position on anything?



Still waiting for my 550 bucks..................
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 22801
ACT
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #11 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 4:52pm
 
Does anyone take this mob seriously?

Longy, cods and Armpit excepted!  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #12 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 6:15pm
 
Try 'Concedes' in your header. Don't you own a spell check? Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39641
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Consedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #13 - Mar 21st, 2015 at 7:22pm
 
red baron wrote on Mar 21st, 2015 at 6:15pm:
Try 'Concedes' in your header. Don't you own a spell check? Cool


Great post, Mr Barron.  That'll learn him!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14247
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Mr Abbott Concedes Defeat On Melbourne Road
Reply #14 - Mar 22nd, 2015 at 8:21am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 20th, 2015 at 6:18pm:
The funds allocated for the cancelled project are Commonwealth funds and Abbott is right - they should be spent on things that are of national significance.






At what point did a proposed road,
beginning in Melbourne's inner east

- and
terminating in Melbourne's inner west

- become a "thing of national significance" ?




Please EXPLAIN ?





Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 22nd, 2015 at 9:27am by buzzanddidj »  

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print