Aussie wrote on Mar 2
nd, 2015 at 8:11pm:
I have no greater knowledge of copyright laws than the average bear, but I have little doubt your use of the basic George/Monk copyrighted image would be illegal. .
Then be told. The image is original.. from scratch... and not a copyright breach.
Secondly, the law permits parody's. This falls into that class of artefact.
So.. in little bitty steps that you can understand.
"but" ... as with all "but"s, ignore everything preceding it.
" I have little doubt"... so some doubt... so you should.
" your use of the basic George/Monk copyrighted image" ... not so. Take a copy and analise it. It is not the same image. No part of his image was used in this reproduction.. The red is no pixel perfect the same even.
" would be illegal." ... wrong.
I am glad we have closed this matter down for good.
Will you be told... let's see. I have had this out with you before over 2 years ago and you still carry on and are still wrong.
Next drama......