Australian Politics Forum - It might be worth keeping an eye on this...

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #30 - Feb 9^th, 2015 at 5:45pm

lee wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 5:26pm:

'Standard Government job'

Governments rule through fear- global cooling, nuclear winter, global warming. They use that fear to get elected or re-elected.

Scientists are a microcosm of society; replete with the rogues that plague humanity.

John Cook's 41 papers of those scientists that explicitly stated humans caused climate change not withstanding. He then added in others that intimated or mentioned cAGW to pad the number to reach 97%.

'are being accused of taking dodgy money and they aren't'

I haven't seen that, but I can't be absolutely sure it doesn't happen either. I mean the Koch Bros fund a lot of pro- AGW universities. Penn State being one.

So,if they aren't on the take are they incompetent? A la one, M Mann, treemometers and upside down Tiljander graphs?

CRACK IS SO BORING MATE... Grin

I would advise you to stop smoking it... Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #31 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:39am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2015 at 1:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:07pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:43pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:42pm:

lee wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:13pm:

Wow - going down before AGW.

I don't see the chart going back beyond 1896.

No, but it IS going down in 1953..

57 years after the theory of Global Warming was first put forward.

Well around that....although the 'theory of Global Warming' didn't get much traction until about the 1970s or so...

Is that why the nuclear industry was trying to use it to sell nuclear power in Perth in the 1960s?

Huh

The proposed nuclear power plant near Perth was 1977.
1969 was the when the Jervis Bay nuclear power plant proposal.

The anti-nuclear movement didn't even really kick off until 1972 (when the French were doing tests at Moruroa Atoll)

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #32 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:43am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2015 at 1:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:07pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:43pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:42pm:

lee wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:13pm:

Wow - going down before AGW.

I don't see the chart going back beyond 1896.

No, but it IS going down in 1953..

57 years after the theory of Global Warming was first put forward.

Well around that....although the 'theory of Global Warming' didn't get much traction until about the 1970s or so...

Is that why the nuclear industry was trying to use it to sell nuclear power in Perth in the 1960s?

Huh

The proposed nuclear power plant near Perth was 1977.
1969 was the when the Jervis Bay nuclear power plant proposal.

ok ,... so you're telling me I'm a liar Wink

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #33 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:44am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:43am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2015 at 1:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:07pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:43pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:42pm:

lee wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:13pm:

Wow - going down before AGW.

I don't see the chart going back beyond 1896.

No, but it IS going down in 1953..

57 years after the theory of Global Warming was first put forward.

Well around that....although the 'theory of Global Warming' didn't get much traction until about the 1970s or so...

Is that why the nuclear industry was trying to use it to sell nuclear power in Perth in the 1960s?

Huh

The proposed nuclear power plant near Perth was 1977.
1969 was the when the Jervis Bay nuclear power plant proposal.

ok ,... so you're telling me I'm a liar Wink

Misinformed perhaps...

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #34 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:45am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:44am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:43am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2015 at 1:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:07pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:43pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:42pm:

lee wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:13pm:

Wow - going down before AGW.

I don't see the chart going back beyond 1896.

No, but it IS going down in 1953..

57 years after the theory of Global Warming was first put forward.

Well around that....although the 'theory of Global Warming' didn't get much traction until about the 1970s or so...

Is that why the nuclear industry was trying to use it to sell nuclear power in Perth in the 1960s?

Huh

The proposed nuclear power plant near Perth was 1977.
1969 was the when the Jervis Bay nuclear power plant proposal.

ok ,... so you're telling me I'm a liar Wink

Misinformed perhaps...

-->you responded in less than 15 seconds i would have to have said,... whoah!

...something serious going on there buddy... Roll Eyes

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #35 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:47am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:45am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:44am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:43am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2015 at 1:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:07pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:43pm:

Wolseley wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:42pm:

lee wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 8:13pm:

Wow - going down before AGW.

I don't see the chart going back beyond 1896.

No, but it IS going down in 1953..

57 years after the theory of Global Warming was first put forward.

Well around that....although the 'theory of Global Warming' didn't get much traction until about the 1970s or so...

Is that why the nuclear industry was trying to use it to sell nuclear power in Perth in the 1960s?

Huh

The proposed nuclear power plant near Perth was 1977.
1969 was the when the Jervis Bay nuclear power plant proposal.

ok ,... so you're telling me I'm a liar Wink

Misinformed perhaps...

-->you responded in less than 15 seconds i would have to have said,... whoah!

...something serious going on there buddy... Roll Eyes

Nope, up late watching tv shows on the computer.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #36 - Feb 19^th, 2015 at 4:25pm http://www.komonews.com/weather/blogs/scott/Mountain-snowpack-now-totally-gone-i...
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #37 - Feb 20^th, 2015 at 4:46pm According to Office of the Washington State Climatologist they only have data since 1979 for Hurricane Ridge. http://www.climate.washington.edu/snowdepth/
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #38 - Feb 20^th, 2015 at 6:24pm lee wrote on Feb 20^th, 2015 at 4:46pm: According to Office of the Washington State Climatologist they only have data since 1979 for Hurricane Ridge. http://www.climate.washington.edu/snowdepth/ The article acknowleges that fact!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #39 - Feb 21^st, 2015 at 12:40pm Actually from the link the only thing I can see is - 'The worst ever before since 1979 was 17" in 2005' Nothing to say "no data before 1979". Of course I could be wrong. So please point me to where it says there is no earlier data.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this...
Reply #40 - Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 12:40am

lee wrote on Feb 21^st, 2015 at 12:40pm:

Actually from the link the only thing I can see is -

'The worst ever before since 1979 was 17" in 2005'

Nothing to say "no data before 1979". Of course I could be wrong. So please point me to where it says there is no earlier data.

That's it--> there is the acknowledgement right there... were you expecting a newspaper article to be of scientific journal standard or something Roll Eyes

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #41 - Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 3:56pm http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/28/california-snowpack-low_n_6567476.html
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #42 - Feb 23^rd, 2015 at 11:03am California is in drought- what a surprise.
Back to top	IP Logged

innocentbystander. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4723 Gender:	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #43 - Feb 25^th, 2015 at 1:47pm lee wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2015 at 11:03am: California is in drought- what a surprise. California in drought, I bet thats never happened before ... well never happened before apart from the ten thousand other times that is
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: It might be worth keeping an eye on this... Reply #44 - Feb 25^th, 2015 at 2:20pm innocentbystander. wrote on Feb 25^th, 2015 at 1:47pm: lee wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2015 at 11:03am: California is in drought- what a surprise. California in drought, I bet thats never happened before ... well never happened before apart from the ten thousand other times that is no links of course
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged