Australian Politics Forum - * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #15 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:11pm

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

When the story differs from reality; go with the story.

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #16 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:17pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:11pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

When the story differs from reality; go with the story.

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

NO, Lee might to think that 'desertification' is stupid...which is really what the rest of us humans think...as opposed to idiots like YOU

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #17 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:11pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

When the story differs from reality; go with the story.

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

NO, Lee might to think that 'desertification' is stupid...which is really what the rest of us humans think...as opposed to idiots like YOU

Desertification is no laughing matter... Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 21596
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #18 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 5:17pm

Desertification?

'Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2'

http://www.csiro.au/Portals/Media/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2.aspx

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm:

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

That story doesn't even mention desert let alone desertification.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #19 - Jan 31^st, 2015 at 6:31pm

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 5:17pm:

Desertification?

'Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2'

http://www.csiro.au/Portals/Media/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2.aspx

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm:

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

That story doesn't even mention desert let alone desertification

.

It doesn't have to as I am implying that desertification is the reason investors are now demanding action on climate change...

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #20 - Jan 31^st, 2015 at 6:33pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 31^st, 2015 at 6:31pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 5:17pm:

Desertification?

'Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2'

http://www.csiro.au/Portals/Media/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2.aspx

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm:

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

That story doesn't even mention desert let alone desertification.

It doesn't have to as I am implying that desertification is the reason investors are now demanding action on climate change...

..however there will be secondary effects that are likely to influence water availability, the carbon cycle, fire regimes and biodiversity, for example," Dr Donohue said.
"Ongoing research is required if we are to fully comprehend the potential extent and severity of such secondary effects."

..from lees very own source no less Roll Eyes

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #21 - Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #22 - Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #23 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #24 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #25 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #26 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #27 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #28 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 3:04pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

i'M NOT A PSEPHOLOGIST

"bYE bYE TONY ABBOTT...!"

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #29 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:18pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 3:04pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

i'M NOT A PSEPHOLOGIST

"bYE bYE TONY ABBOTT...!"

Nobody is "PSEPHOLOGIST", since that is a word you just made up, either out stupidity, or an inability to spell "psychologist"

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged