Swagman wrote on Dec 28
th, 2014 at 1:29pm:
Melanias purse wrote on Dec 28
th, 2014 at 1:05pm:
Public hospitals don’t charge anyone for using Accident & Emergency. Private hospitals don’t provide this service
And this is relevant because....?
Melanias purse wrote on Dec 28
th, 2014 at 1:05pm:
And even if public hospitals did receive funding from private insurance (like the US), how would this take the burden off the public system?
Arbitrarily if the cost of a public hospital bed if $500 per day. If it's filled by a private patient the hospital gets $500 off the private health fund and not from the Govt. The Govt (aka the Taxpayer) saves $500. This $500 dollars can then be used for something else such as better equipment etc.
That's how it takes the burden off the public system.
Melanias purse wrote on Dec 28
th, 2014 at 1:05pm:
The elite private schools receive as much funding for students as state schools
Not from all sources of Govt they don't.
Melanias purse wrote on Dec 28
th, 2014 at 1:05pm:
Private schools don’t save taxpayers money when they’re funded by taxpayers.
A naïve argument. Private school kids get about 0.40c in the dollar Govt funding. Therefore the Govt is saving 60% on the public cost of educating every private school child. The Govt would have to find this extra 0.60c in the dollar if there were no private schools.
Private schools might get 40 cents in the dollar of the fees parents pay, but they receive the same funding per student across the board.
Some schools actually receive more government funding than state schools. Kings in Sydney is one such school.
This is why the Gonski reforms are important. At present, there is no rhyme or reason to school funding. Much of it depends on the electorate parents live in, or their influence (like the prestigious Kings school).
Labor and Liberal governments are both guilty of pork barreling school funding. Menzies started it with the Catholics, and Whitlam continued the tradition with Anglican schools. Successive governments have added more and more.