Australian Politics Forum - should this be allowed? (warning may offend)

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #45 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:05pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 5:08pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Sounds like a storm in a teacup. A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little.

Everybody has their own private sex fantasies. Some sicker than others. Paedophilia is unlawful. However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved. This is a sex toy. If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it? So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body? How does that really change things?

Paedophiles are sick individuals. They need help. However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll? I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous. Roll Eyes

ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say.

Ah. OK, so now we are all glove puppets? Wink

I dont think he is referring to sock puppets, I played him like a banjo yesterday and hes got his panties in a bunch.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #46 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA. You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39466
Gender: male

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #47 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:04pm

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA. You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

No....find it yourself. FD can confirm.

Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought.

Link.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:09pm by Aussie »

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #48 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:12pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:04pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA. You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

No....find it yourself. FD can confirm.

Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought.

Link.

I cant see any post in that thread confirming your claim.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39466
Gender: male

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #49 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:18pm

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:04pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA. You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

No....find it yourself. FD can confirm.

Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought.

Link.

I cant see any post in that thread confirming your claim.

You did not see the 'cartoon?'

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #50 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:19pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:05pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 5:08pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Sounds like a storm in a teacup. A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little.

Everybody has their own private sex fantasies. Some sicker than others. Paedophilia is unlawful. However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved. This is a sex toy. If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it? So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body? How does that really change things?

Paedophiles are sick individuals. They need help. However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll? I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous. Roll Eyes

ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say.

Ah. OK, so now we are all glove puppets? Wink

Hands up all those who are glove puppets

... wait a minute...... I'll get back to you... gotta have a talk with my writers....

No, wait, no I'm not. I don't think I am. The captain made me post that! Wink

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #51 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:22pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:18pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:04pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA. You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

No....find it yourself. FD can confirm.

Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought.

Link.

I cant see any post in that thread confirming your claim.

You did not see the 'cartoon?'

your claimed public advice, where is it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17065
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #52 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:25pm

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Googled it... Weird huh?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39466
Gender: male

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #53 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:27pm

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:22pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:18pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:04pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll
Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA. You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

No....find it yourself. FD can confirm.

Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought.

Link.

I cant see any post in that thread confirming your claim.

You did not see the 'cartoon?'

your claimed public advice, where is it.

Harder to find, but FD can confirm. It may have been elsewhere at PA.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 9451	Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend) Reply #54 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:28pm Let the record show Aussie was unable to provide evidence of his claim that he "publically advised Freedriver"
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39466 Gender:	Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend) Reply #55 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:30pm ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:28pm: Let the record show Aussie was unable to provide evidence of his claim that he "publically advised Freedriver" Indeed, the record speaks for itself and there is nothing you can do to change it ian.
Back to top	IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #56 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:37pm

I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I know you did because I can remember you doing so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD"

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39466
Gender: male

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #57 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:38pm

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:37pm:

I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I kn ow you did because I can remember you dong so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD"

And do you also recall freediver ridiculing the advice I gave him?

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #58 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:40pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:38pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:37pm:

I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I kn ow you did because I can remember you dong so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD"

And do you also recall freediver ridiculing the advice I gave him?

no

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39466
Gender: male

Re: should this be allowed? (warning may offend)
Reply #59 - Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:43pm

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:38pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:37pm:

I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I kn ow you did because I can remember you dong so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD"

And do you also recall freediver ridiculing the advice I gave him?

no

Your memory sucks. (It may have been at PA.)

Back to top

IP Logged